%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-07T15:18:42-04:00
2021-07-07T15:18:41-04:00
2021-07-07T15:18:42-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
99-0557.a1
uuid:7baf0851-7c3d-4747-9cef-a59d2f72ee4e
uuid:77bde8ab-812c-4f7d-a523-401ad09b2b28
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
19 0 obj
<>
endobj
21 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
23 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
20 0 obj
<><><><><><>]/P 18 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
25 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(99-0557.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/99-0557.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([7/7/2021 3:18:41 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: July 10, 2000)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(----------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 99-0557)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
11.641 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION AND REVERSAL ORDER)Tj
8.793 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-3.262 -2.2 Td
(Carol A. Marchant, Department Counsel)Tj
-2.541 -2.2 Td
(Peregrine Russell-Hunter, Chief Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
6.581 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-0.624 -2.2 Td
(Earl G. Kauffman, Esq.)Tj
12 0 0 12 16 394.5 Tm
(Administrative Judge Kathryn Moen Braeman issued a decision dated Januar\
y 10, 2000, in which she concluded it is)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(clearly consistent with the national interest)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(to grant or continue a security clearance for Applicant. )Tj
39.485 0 Td
(Department Counsel)Tj
-39.485 -1.125 Td
(appealed. )Tj
4.053 0 Td
(For the reasons set forth below, the Board reverses the Administrative)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Judge's decision.)Tj
-4.053 -2.125 Td
(The Board has jurisdiction on appeal under Executive Order 10865 and Dep\
artment of Defense Directive 5220.6)Tj
T*
(\(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992, as)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(amended.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Department Counsel's appeal presents the following issues: \(1\) whether\
the Administrative Judge erred by concluding)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Applicant had a reasonable legal basis for)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(failing to disclose on his security clearance application a 1996 inciden\
t which)Tj
T*
(resulted in five criminal charges and ultimately one conviction against \
him; \(2\))Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(whether the Administrative Judge's)Tj
T*
(determination that embarrassment is an acceptable basis for mitigation o\
f falsification is consistent with the Directive;)Tj
T*
(\(3\))Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(whether the Administrative Judge's application of )Tj
21.536 0 Td
(Mitigating Condition 2 under Criterion E is arbitrary, capricious)Tj
-21.536 -1.125 Td
(and contrary to law; and \(4\) whether the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(record supports the Administrative Judge's conclusion that Applicant's c\
onduct)Tj
T*
(was excusable as a result of stress.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
20.032 -2.125 Td
(Procedural History)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.032 -2.125 Td
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals issued to Applicant a Stateme\
nt of Reasons \(SOR\) dated September 7,)Tj
T*
(1999. )Tj
(The SOR was based on Criterion E)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(\(Personal Conduct\) and Criterion J \(Criminal Conduct\). )Tj
39.355 0 Td
(A hearing was held)Tj
-39.355 -1.125 Td
(on December 6, 1999. )Tj
9.108 0 Td
(The Administrative Judge issued a written decision dated)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(January 10, 2000, in which she)Tj
-9.108 -1.125 Td
(concluded that is clearly consistent with the national interest to grant\
or continue a security clearance for Applicant.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(The case is before the Board on Department Counsel's appeal from the Adm\
inistrative Judge's favorable security)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(clearance decision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
21.225 -2.125 Td
(Appeal Issues)Tj
ET
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 40.5 Tm
(1. )Tj
(Whether the Administrative Judge erred by concluding Applicant had a rea\
sonable legal basis for failing to disclose)Tj
ET
Q
q 1 0 0 1 28 39.75 cm
0 0 m
555.826 0 l
h
S
Q
EMC
endstream
endobj
26 0 obj
<>
endobj
27 0 obj
("y2{&u)
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
29 0 obj
<>
endobj
32 0 obj
<>
endobj
33 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0E
-EpDLYA~cORC#YRA-mhzǶioMK3mTm7|Sٙ,%^OphMQ#xuGZck{u?z۱],l{-Oj!my_G)/ک͇2U[++e8)YbP;N?Te4E8-MNK✜)xFف,`O9y~"?%xE^5xCNnnnnnn>>¾} xAA/BOS)t nnnnn