%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-07T15:18:48-04:00
2021-07-07T15:18:48-04:00
2021-07-07T15:18:48-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
99-0625.a1
uuid:3afc5cec-d065-4628-86d3-4e9db3fd69ef
uuid:aaf710fc-57a2-4f7f-b38c-0e8f1fbe4e55
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
23 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
19 0 obj
<><><><><><>]/P 17 0 R/Pg 12 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
12 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
24 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(99-0625.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/99-0625.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([7/7/2021 3:18:48 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: August 17, 2000)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(-----------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 99-0625)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
11.641 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION AND REVERSAL ORDER)Tj
8.793 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-5.178 -2.2 Td
(Peregrine D. Russell-Hunter, Department Counsel)Tj
2.249 -2.2 Td
(Martin H. Mogul, Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
3.707 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.2 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 394.5 Tm
(Administrative Judge Wilford H. Ross issued a decision dated April 12, 2\
000, in which he concluded it is clearly)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(consistent with the national interest to grant or)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(continue a security clearance for Applicant. )Tj
36.515 0 Td
(Department Counsel)Tj
-36.515 -1.125 Td
(appealed. )Tj
4.053 0 Td
(For the reasons that follow the Board reverses the Administrative Judge'\
s decision.)Tj
-4.053 -2.125 Td
(The Board has jurisdiction on appeal under Executive Order 10865 and Dep\
artment of Defense Directive 5220.6)Tj
T*
(\(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992, as)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(amended.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Department Counsel's appeal presents the following issue: Whether the Ad\
ministrative Judge's conclusion that)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Applicant had overcome the government's case)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(was supported by the record evidence.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
20.032 -2.125 Td
(Procedural History)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.032 -2.125 Td
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals issued a Statement of Reasons\
\(SOR\) to Applicant dated October 22,)Tj
T*
(1999. )Tj
(The SOR was based on Criterion F)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(\(Financial Considerations\). )Tj
27.885 0 Td
(Applicant declined a hearing and the)Tj
-27.885 -1.125 Td
(Administrative Judge decided the case based on the administrative record\
. )Tj
29.907 0 Td
(On April 12, 2000)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(the Administrative Judge)Tj
-29.907 -1.125 Td
(issued a favorable decision. )Tj
11.302 0 Td
(The case is before the Appeal Board on the government's appeal of that d\
ecision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
10.118 -2.125 Td
(Appeal Issue)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-21.419 -2.125 Td
(Whether the Administrative Judge's conclusion that Applicant had overcom\
e the government's case was supported by)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 16 146.25 cm
0 0 m
564.17 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 133.5 Tm
(the record evidence)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 16 132.75 cm
0 0 m
93.943 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 109.9434 133.5 Tm
(. )Tj
(Department Counsel)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(argues that the record evidence shows that Applicant is responsible for \
debts)Tj
-7.829 -1.125 Td
(on which he is failing to make payments in a timely or voluntary fashion\
.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(The bulk of the Administrative Judge's findings of fact are uncontested.\
)Tj
28.895 0 Td
(The Administrative Judge concluded that the)Tj
-28.895 -1.125 Td
(government had met its burden of proving)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(by substantial evidence that Applicant has debts which he cannot or will\
not)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(resolve. )Tj
(However the Administrative Judge concluded that the unresolved debts)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(were mitigated. )Tj
38.655 0 Td
(The Department)Tj
-38.655 -1.125 Td
(Counsel challenges that conclusion.)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
26 0 obj
(- Y5ƒ =)
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
29 0 obj
<>
endobj
34 0 obj
<>
endobj
35 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
Cqb>Xpl%3,qC~]:OHvϝ5{p:֠eQ[3N~["Ν%6]p[`uFmAH^3ϲC)ov _gӸx0H;!YF2_\Tèe`NUEpTD|n2#L.s^c@ǂ@tد fz
endstream
endobj
36 0 obj
<>stream
H|Xϙsgw*
evf]41K>c" E,(b,b[P*vQD`CTe*,Y>}{_rs3g} T)@uoZ>XEĆ-Y]
n3Z_)vGv mFt؞ uR 4mJJP
~vLTxK'4뵉{Ď,8ڇA1 BalAT 8뇅F 2 mP~Ȩiy<A
Di-@QEuqxrMnz0VRZ,
A_»|p
rӼ/R^LswMbF+.*WZ͵znj{ԩ[S^ުAF4ħY-}[nӶ]:uԿKn{|y/z}?柽hX83h𐡱ÆǍ9jcƎ?lj?MqT >sjI_Ղ&S}E4&S͢Ut^*,Xl&Cřb8W<">_tNɞ+=*CQ*JrV(J>R?B?G/?17L3$~1dXXXXר(/ˠ*UWMPjSUj:K]R7[\5O-TSeoj
3EMCLÛNqj6g9f8m~Ύ.2/[̤ ol@ZM%Ue!b.&ybDP]S<LQv*URhh}>s C!ސCuΡ=0cd_p!EMS>p(.q>p2
|n6̛ͯ7Qӡser[J5D٠s% ӄjkx[x)K- oookom77bojobodoh7ՏW~ZƵEEt[2m]5w[(m6okkmnmd5ZYݬhyd)-w,7߲X-9|uȲֲm1Z96hF0 Wj...qqVh:u Hq|~x~w^jW1zoqCZ"c,\p=rs}.]~XEΤGg:sTӅɰ2a
B4
x
a1$ޗ
Ȃ^@:lp6 "#pNq(p4Ȇ98g!C)$`C 0H0`$`4`q0ÏLXaS<ݸEp[\Kq
@W?-JT\+p%*+aeL^\ЌY7FMV<&a2nspVsbuD7܃yXk,܋Xp?@wM`]