%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-07T15:18:52-04:00
2021-07-07T15:18:51-04:00
2021-07-07T15:18:52-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
99-0712.a1
uuid:b697c4fe-dc57-4a56-b3f5-8566c34e87ea
uuid:15202e74-0284-439e-af13-12ce0755fa99
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
15 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
19 0 obj
[18 0 R 18 0 R]
endobj
20 0 obj
[18 0 R 18 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
[18 0 R 18 0 R]
endobj
18 0 obj
<><><><>]/P 16 0 R/Pg 12 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
12 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
22 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(99-0712.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/99-0712.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([7/7/2021 3:18:51 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: August 29, 2000)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(-----------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 99-0712)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-6.414 -2.2 Td
(Peregrine D. Russell-Hunter, )Tj
11.858 0 Td
(Chief Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
-4.667 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.2 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(Administrative Judge Darlene Lokey-Anderson issued a decision, dated Apr\
il 27, 2000, in )Tj
36.353 0 Td
(which she concluded it is not)Tj
-36.353 -1.125 Td
(clearly consistent with the national interest to grant or continue a sec\
urity clearance for Applicant. )Tj
39.485 0 Td
(Applicant appealed.)Tj
-39.485 -1.125 Td
(For the reasons set forth below, the Board affirms the Administrative Ju\
dge's decision.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(This Board has jurisdiction on appeal under Executive Order 10865 and De\
partment of Defense Directive 5220.6)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(\(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992, as amended.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant's appeal presents the following issues; \(1\) whether there ar\
e grounds for granting Applicant a secret clearance)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(\(as opposed to top secret\) to Applicant; and \(2\) whether the Judge's\
adverse security clearance decision is arbitrary,)Tj
T*
(capricious or contrary to law.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
20.032 -2.125 Td
(Procedural History)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.032 -2.125 Td
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals issued a Statement of Reasons\
\(SOR\) to Applicant dated January 11, 2000.)Tj
T*
(The SOR was based on Guideline E \(Personal Conduct\) and Guideline J \(\
Criminal Conduct\). )Tj
37.521 0 Td
(The Applicant responded)Tj
-37.521 -1.125 Td
(to the SOR in writing on January 26, 2000 and indicated he wanted to hav\
e the case determined on the written record in)Tj
T*
(lieu of a hearing. )Tj
7.025 0 Td
(Department Counsel submitted a File of Relevant Material \(FORM\) on Feb\
ruary 28, 2000. )Tj
36.577 0 Td
(The)Tj
-43.602 -1.125 Td
(Applicant received the FORM on March 9, 2000 and submitted a response to\
it on March 24, 2000.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(The case was then assigned to the Administrative Judge for disposition. \
The Judge issued a written decision, dated April)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(27, 2000. )Tj
(In the decision she concluded that it is not clearly consistent with the\
national interest to grant or continue a)Tj
T*
(security clearance for Applicant. )Tj
13.299 0 Td
(The case is before the Board on Applicant's appeal from that adverse dec\
ision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
7.926 -2.125 Td
(Appeal Issues)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-21.225 -2.125 Td
(1. )Tj
(Whether there are grounds for granting a secret clearance to Applicant)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 28 91.5 cm
0 0 m
337.834 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 365.834 92.25 Tm
(. )Tj
(For the first time on appeal, Applicant)Tj
-29.153 -1.125 Td
(describes some procedural history concerning his security clearance appl\
ications in support of his assertion that he)Tj
T*
(should be granted at least a secret level clearance. )Tj
20.156 0 Td
(He claims that he applied for and received a secret level clearance in)Tj
-20.156 -1.125 Td
(1997 and then applied for an upgrade of that clearance to the top secret\
level in 1998. )Tj
34.376 0 Td
(He claims that the same)Tj
ET
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
12 0 0 12 16 38.25 Tm
(information he provided in his 1997 application was provided again in hi\
s 1998 application. )Tj
37.021 0 Td
(Decrying this perceived)Tj
ET
EMC
Q
endstream
endobj
23 0 obj
<>
endobj
24 0 obj
(m7&Ya)
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
26 0 obj
<>
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
32 0 obj
<>
endobj
33 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
Cqb>Xpl%3,qC~]:OHvϝ5{p:֠eQ[3N~["Ν%6]p[`uFmAH^3ϲC)ov _gӸx0H;!YF2_\Tèe`NUEpTD|n2#L.s^c@ǂ@tد fz
endstream
endobj
34 0 obj
<>stream
H|XTg{AP,ww5ر
ϘH(TbAPPAb/UbyЧ}K͙3̝w 7-ۼmb" z8l ^ G+:-,jxdI v#&S2R |0ux=p~cx/l:X#<<.r\<_7:(24l|?ңƌti;+?ͷ8_C`XpHh#GED5v'L4)SMs\YM7¤E,e+W5k%OIݰq)-=c3mٚmvٛoهrr;
N9{_xprXU$AӰR N~4\GbR(ŹBX|=-VMw[L+k> y