%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T14:10:57-04:00
2021-07-02T14:10:56-04:00
2021-07-02T14:10:57-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
00-0016.a1
uuid:cad83419-2814-4e5f-a8ea-57967a7e851b
uuid:a10efa4b-c3b7-4041-b21e-94e6a533a4c5
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
19 0 obj
<>
endobj
21 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
23 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
[20 0 R]
endobj
20 0 obj
<><><><><>]/P 18 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
25 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(00-0016.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/00-0016.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([7/2/2021 2:10:57 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: October 23, 2000)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(----------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 00-0016)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-6.414 -2.2 Td
(Peregrine D. Russell-Hunter, Chief Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
7.192 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
1.014 -2.2 Td
(Dan Cron, Esq.)Tj
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(Administrative Judge Kathryn M. Braeman issued a decision, dated June 9,\
2000, in which she concluded it is not)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(clearly)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
2.97 0 Td
(consistent with the national interest to grant or continue a security cl\
earance for Applicant. )Tj
36.515 0 Td
(Applicant appealed.)Tj
-39.485 -1.125 Td
(For the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(reasons that follow the Board affirms the Administrative Judge's decisio\
n.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(The Board has jurisdiction on appeal under Executive Order 10865 and Dep\
artment of Defense Directive 5220.6)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(\(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992, as amended.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant's appeal presents the following issues: \(1\) whether or not t\
he Administrative Judge erred by not viewing the)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(disposition of Applicant's criminal case as the equivalent of an acquitt\
al for purposes of mitigation; \(2\) whether the)Tj
T*
(Judge erred by concluding that Applicant had failed to present clear evi\
dence of successful rehabilitation; and \(3\))Tj
T*
(whether the Administrative Judge considered all of the record evidence.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
20.032 -2.125 Td
(Procedural History)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.032 -2.125 Td
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals issued a Statement of Reasons\
\(SOR\) to Applicant dated January 26, 2000.)Tj
T*
(The SOR was based on Guideline J \(Criminal Conduct\). )Tj
22.774 0 Td
(Applicant responded to the SOR by Answer dated February 18,)Tj
-22.774 -1.125 Td
(2000 and requested a hearing.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(A hearing was held on May 15, 2000. )Tj
(At the hearing, Department Counsel presented evidence that Applicant ple\
d guilty)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(to a charge of Abuse of a Child, a third degree felony in the state of A\
pplicant's residence. )Tj
36.279 0 Td
(The evidence also established)Tj
-36.279 -1.125 Td
(that Applicant was granted a conditional discharge and was placed on sup\
ervised probation for one year. )Tj
42.069 0 Td
(Applicant)Tj
-42.069 -1.125 Td
(introduced evidence of his superior job performance and his rehabilitati\
on efforts which led to successful completion of)Tj
T*
(his probation.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(The Administrative Judge issued a written decision, dated June 9, 2000, \
in which she concluded it is not clearly)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(consistent with the national interest to grant or continue a security cl\
earance for Applicant. )Tj
36.515 0 Td
(The case is before the Board)Tj
-36.515 -1.125 Td
(on Applicant's appeal from the Judge's adverse security clearance decisi\
on.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
21.225 -2.125 Td
(Appeal Issues)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
26 0 obj
<>
endobj
27 0 obj
(H+:n)
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
29 0 obj
<>
endobj
32 0 obj
<>
endobj
33 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0E
-EpDLYA~cORC#YRA-mhzǶioMK3mTm7|Sٙ,%^OphMQ#xuGZck{u?z۱],l{-Oj!my_G)/ک͇2U[++e8)YbP;N?Te4E8-MNK✜)xFف,`O9y~"?%xE^5xCNnnnnnn>>¾} xAA/BOS)t nnnnn