%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T14:11:01-04:00
2021-07-02T14:11-04:00
2021-07-02T14:11:01-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
00-0030.a1
uuid:8986659f-03d5-4748-b7bb-7a9dbddf96d6
uuid:0c82214c-95f6-4628-8246-532569871ddb
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
21 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
22 0 obj
<>
endobj
23 0 obj
<>
endobj
25 0 obj
[24 0 R 24 0 R]
endobj
26 0 obj
[24 0 R 24 0 R]
endobj
27 0 obj
[24 0 R 24 0 R]
endobj
28 0 obj
[24 0 R 24 0 R]
endobj
29 0 obj
[24 0 R 24 0 R]
endobj
30 0 obj
[24 0 R 24 0 R]
endobj
31 0 obj
[24 0 R 24 0 R]
endobj
32 0 obj
[24 0 R 24 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><>]/P 22 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
33 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(00-0030.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/00-0030.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([7/2/2021 2:11:00 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: September 20, 2001)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(---------------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 00-0030)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-3.526 -2.2 Td
(Erin C. Hogan, Esq., Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
4.304 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-0.652 -2.2 Td
(Alfred F. Arquilla, Esq,)Tj
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(Administrative Judge Elizabeth M. Matchinski issued a decision, dated Ma\
y 7, 2001, in which she concluded it is not)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(clearly consistent with the national interest to grant or)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
21.799 0 Td
(continue a security clearance for Applicant. )Tj
17.686 0 Td
(Applicant appealed.)Tj
-39.485 -1.125 Td
(For the reasons set forth below, the Board affirms the Administrative Ju\
dge's decision.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(This Board has jurisdiction on appeal under Executive Order 10865 and De\
partment of Defense Directive 5220.6)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(\(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992, as amended.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant's appeal presents the following issues: \(1\) whether the gove\
rnment abused its discretion by proceeding against)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(him; \(2\) whether the Administrative Judge erred)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
19.578 0 Td
(by making a finding that classified U.S. information was presented by a)Tj
-19.578 -1.125 Td
(foreign national at a January 1998 meeting; and \(3\) whether the Admini\
strative Judge's adverse)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
38.391 0 Td
(security clearance)Tj
-38.391 -1.125 Td
(decision is arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to law.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
20.032 -2.125 Td
(Procedural History)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.032 -2.125 Td
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals issued to Applicant a Stateme\
nt of Reasons \(SOR\) dated September 28,)Tj
T*
(2000. )Tj
(The SOR was based on Guideline K)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(\(Security Violations\), Guideline E \(Personal Conduct\), and Guideline\
J)Tj
T*
(\(Criminal Conduct\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(A hearing was held on March 23, 2001. )Tj
16.107 0 Td
(The Administrative Judge issued a written decision, dated May 7, 2001, i\
n)Tj
-16.107 -1.125 Td
(which she concluded it is not clearly consistent with)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
21.134 0 Td
(the national interest to grant or continue a security clearance for)Tj
-21.134 -1.125 Td
(Applicant.)Tj
T*
(The case is before the Board on Applicant's appeal from the Administrati\
ve Judge's adverse security clearance decision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
21.225 -2.125 Td
(Appeal Issues)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-21.225 -2.125 Td
(The Administrative Judge made the following salient findings concerning \
Applicant's actions and inactions in)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(connection with a five-day meeting in January 1998 \(which)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
24.076 0 Td
(involved classified information\):)Tj
-24.076 -2.125 Td
(Applicant failed to ensure that all persons attending the meeting were a\
ppropriately cleared, and allowed some)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
34 0 obj
<>
endobj
35 0 obj
(+X4\n2j)
endobj
36 0 obj
<>
endobj
37 0 obj
<>
endobj
40 0 obj
<>
endobj
41 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0E
-EpDLYA~cORC#YRA-mhzǶioMK3mTm7|Sٙ,%^OphMQ#xuGZck{u?z۱],l{-Oj!my_G)/ک͇2U[++e8)YbP;N?Te4E8-MNK✜)xFف,`O9y~"?%xE^5xCNnnnnnn>>¾} xAA/BOS)t nnnnn