%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T14:11:03-04:00
2021-07-02T14:11:02-04:00
2021-07-02T14:11:03-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
00-0051.a1
uuid:a3a31cba-14d3-4d7e-acb7-53babbaa0e60
uuid:b0585dba-a06f-4aba-b3ab-88b7c6ba57d7
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
19 0 obj
<><><><>]/P 17 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
23 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(00-0051.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/00-0051.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([7/2/2021 2:11:02 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: July 23, 2001)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(----------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 00-0051)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-7.539 -2.2 Td
(Peregrine D. Russell-Hunter, Esq., Chief Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
8.317 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.2 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(Administrative Judge Darlene Lokey Anderson issued a decision, dated Apr\
il 18, 2001, in which she concluded it is not)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(clearly consistent with the national interest to grant)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
20.716 0 Td
(or continue a security clearance for Applicant. )Tj
18.769 0 Td
(Applicant appealed.)Tj
-39.485 -1.125 Td
(For the reasons set forth below, the Board affirms the Administrative Ju\
dge's decision.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(This Board has jurisdiction on appeal under Executive Order 10865 and De\
partment of Defense Directive 5220.6)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(\(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992, as amended.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant's appeal presents the following issue: whether the Board shoul\
d review Applicant's security clearance case )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
46.984 0 Td
(de)Tj
-46.984 -1.125 Td
(novo)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( and reverse the Administrative Judge's)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
17.897 0 Td
(adverse security clearance decision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
2.135 -2.125 Td
(Procedural History)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.032 -2.125 Td
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals issued a Statement of Reasons\
\(SOR\) dated May 31, 2000 to Applicant.)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(The SOR was based on Guideline E \(Personal)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
18.663 0 Td
(Conduct\), and Guideline B \(Foreign Influence\).)Tj
-18.663 -2.125 Td
(In responding to the SOR, Applicant asked that the hearing in her case b\
e consolidated with that of her husband's case)Tj
T*
(\(ISCR Case No. 00-0050\). )Tj
(Applicant's husband)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(submitted an answer to the SOR in ISCR Case No. 00-0050, in which)Tj
T*
(he asked that the hearing in his case be consolidated with Applicant's c\
ase. )Tj
30.115 0 Td
(Department Counsel)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
8.498 0 Td
(submitted a motion)Tj
-38.613 -1.125 Td
(indicating it joined the request to consolidate the hearings for ISCR Ca\
se No. 00-0050 and ISCR Case No. 00-0051. )Tj
46.659 0 Td
(On)Tj
-46.659 -1.125 Td
(October 17, 2000, the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
8.942 0 Td
(Administrative Judge granted the request for a consolidated hearing. )Tj
27.603 0 Td
(The consolidated hearing)Tj
-36.545 -1.125 Td
(was held on November 29, 2000.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(The Administrative Judge issued a decision, dated April 18, 2001, in whi\
ch she concluded it is not clearly consistent)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(with the national interest to grant or continue a)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
18.967 0 Td
(security clearance for Applicant. )Tj
13.299 0 Td
(The case is before the Board on)Tj
-32.266 -1.125 Td
(Applicant's appeal from that adverse decision.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(When the case file was forwarded to the Board, two documents concerning \
Applicant's case were missing: a copy of the)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Administrative Judge's decision in ISCR Case)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
18.679 0 Td
(No. 00-0051 and Applicant's answer to the SOR in ISCR Case No. 00-)Tj
-18.679 -1.125 Td
(0051. )Tj
(The Western Hearing Office provided the Board with a photocopy of the Ju\
dge's)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
35.031 0 Td
(decision in ISCR Case No. 00-)Tj
ET
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
12 0 0 12 16 38.25 Tm
(0051.)Tj
ET
EMC
Q
endstream
endobj
24 0 obj
<>
endobj
25 0 obj
(Th"@X$Qx)
endobj
26 0 obj
<>
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
29 0 obj
<>
endobj
36 0 obj
<>
endobj
37 0 obj
<>stream
H\Mn0>,E N$TDb Rb,,}g(j =?Ts{Mـx
ީM76[fhJCQ$80ÓϸR[zwYA\],vֿBkK}s2߈3Z|k0HiPh
vwT4B\ WG#qa*7S!΄3y'cy/g>E7g\tsOtBO>jM7-4{йp,ZT89An!P5/YsʽGŏ` #
endstream
endobj
38 0 obj
<>stream
H|XTgv΅HS݅,(64Xc
ĘH#*E;Tu!V
{uQ,OKE/97wΜ3ww9 A_nWdžed;` MJ }fTܰ!E4Nk?,fRO;@` ݣx=h%Ǚ<2tČ[ sx86lb".Qa>x'8%nZFmjW@zM# \|ʂ(+
@nSm L̫xziLS[-E?{-,,1B@O|pp{WVL;{QPϱSgW7<<7iL4Zy|>mݦm;;vܥk@٫w/2(x?|ݠ㐐05,z1FǍ;.&N/SNKęf'%Ι6/}/Yl9dX*kr6lDn۶}]-طC-9vDSϜ-s/\t
\n40kF=TUh[ȋhMC,bYZFf)|=|{ن\CvSY= kwkkokPWmummݙRB^KL)sHl**Ă !LH
2RCXUu:K\4R?))A-Hs4QxM&s