WPCz  !&@ Z>\_VA'ۘ-X/*$"3[Y1՚kf5iz6΅|U.>EX}|OU4NHa9@ 'x4τ/z\*o'XZc;Wrd![=؛И="u~+7K}Īg} CSD `V&V0]_L 72w^ؖQ8 _iAL*)pIvNWS3#>q> ?;e?Sukaj2Ӈ Z:zSE\˾o}c^AƋ "!tη7kj Zd:zYC)|m, I K*w_p#\`|reҨ$դ14)χ8_Z k/u?Xp6 6ʹỖKIHІ`#@UN %W 0:] Z ^ w 4  $ m& E= Z? 0~ 0D N[ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ B] Hewlett-Packard HP LaserJet P3010 Series0(9 Z6Times New Roman RegularX($USUS.,8DocumentManagement::ModifiedBooleanTRUEgK;=JntFold3|xU8DocumentManagement::ModifiedBooleanTRUE(.(3($ !USUS.,      0  (#$  0   d !USUS.,  _KEYWORD:GuidelineF;GuidelineE  DIGEST:ApplicantsappealbriefcontainsnoassertionofharmfulerroronthepartoftheJudge.  Rather,itcontainsnewevidence.Adversedecisionaffirmed. t _CASENO_:1508349.a1 L  DATE:12/4/2017 $ t ____   `     h      p DATE:December4,2017  ` .؉7r(#(#.A_ ) xdEgA   InRe:             ApplicantforSecurityClearance W A_ ) xdE.gA /  > )   )   )   )   ) p ) \ ) H ) 4   p pX p ISCRCaseNo.1508349  !  p" .؉7r. \XXp f"    APPEALBOARDSUMMARYDISPOSITION >$ APPEARANCES '  &_%XX FORGOVERNMENT  ) JamesB.Norman,Esq.,ChiefDepartmentCounsel b *  FORAPPLICANT  "b,  Prose #XX%&_# ":-     TheDepartmentofDefense(DoD)declinedtograntApplicantasecurityclearance.OnJune $/ 13,2016,DoDissuedastatementofreasons(SOR)advisingApplicantofthebasisforthat % 0 decision"securityconcernsraisedunderGuidelineF(FinancialConsiderations)andGuidelineE &!1 (PersonalConduct)ofDepartmentofDefenseDirective5220.6(Jan.2,1992,asamended) p'"2 (Directive).Applicantrequestedadecisiononthewrittenrecord.OnAug.4,2017,after \(#3 consideringtherecord,DefenseOfficeofHearingsandAppeals(DOHA)AdministrativeJudgeJuan H)$4 J.RiveradeniedApplicantsrequestforasecurityclearance.Applicantappealedpursuanttothe 4*%5 DirectiveE3.1.28andE3.1.30.  +p&6   Applicantrequestedthathiscasebedecidedonthewrittenrecordandthendidnotrespond ,H(8 tothegovernmentsFileofRelevantMaterial(FORM).Applicantsappealbriefcontainsno -4)9 assertionofharmfulerroronthepartoftheJudge.Rather,itcontainsnewevidenceintheformof  anarrativestatementbytheApplicantthathehaspaidoffallbutoneoftheolddebtspriortothe  dateofthedecisionandheismarkingpaymentsonthatremainingdebt.Applicantdoesnot  challengetheJudgesadversedecisionastotheGuidelineEallegation. t   TheBoardcannotconsidernewevidenceonappeal.SeeDirectiveE3.1.29.Additionally, L  theBoarddoesnotreviewacasedenovo.TheAppealBoardsauthoritytoreviewacaseislimited 8  tocasesinwhichtheappealingpartyhasallegedtheJudgecommittedharmfulerror.Applicanthas $ t notmadeanallegationofharmfulerroronthepartoftheJudge.Therefore,thedecisionoftheJudge  ` isAFFIRMED.  L         `     h   Signed:MichaelY.Raanan      `     h   MichaelY.Raanan     x        `     h   AdministrativeJudge p    `     h   Chairperson,AppealBoard \    `     h   Signed:JamesF.Duffy H    `     h   JamesF.Duffy 4    `     h   AdministrativeJudge      `     h   Member,AppealBoard      `     h   Signed:WilliamS.Fields x   X     `     h   WilliamS.Fields D!    `     h   AdministrativeJudge 0"     `     h   Member,AppealBoard