WPC^ + oNy4Ly4L@|`I7 We숤P&e݃NR*}QiI%TۢQ}>[R,gP{U$h=o-;N* >ac,| exe')іPN0p-յPmwL(
bo?4a yj}dQ ۔:%+Il6/G+-?YvGIr9Gl2X|lN<ɴq()X CB.l.L\'2E/A6l =] pU%I@;dEx=f3\.Pyz@S@s=9ayZ\FG "ч*&V^iVnp_\5m Z # U N % 0 : ^ C w O 4 S g v m x Z N b U N E = N ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? B A H P L a s e r J e t P 3 0 1 0 S e r i e s P C L 6 0 ( 9 Z 6 T i m e s N e w R o m a n R e g u l a r X ( $ USUS. , }~UJ5 f-I n t F o l d 3| x U 8 D o c u m e n t M a n a g e m e n t : : M o d i f i e d B o o l e a n T R U E 6 T i m e s N e w R o m a n R e g u l a r d ! USUS. , _ KEYWORD:GuidelineF DIGEST:Applicantsbriefincludesdocumentsthatpost_ Ԅdate_ ԀtheJudgesdecision.Wecannot considernewevidenceonappeal.DirectiveE3.1.29.Applicantreiteratessomeofthe t informationthathehadprovidedearlier,asinhisResponsetothe_ SOR_ ,inwhichheclaimsthat ` heisresolvinghislargedebtanddeniesowingtheothers.TheJudgediscussedinformationthat L Applicantsubmittedduringthecourseofhisclearanceadjudication.Applicantshasnotshown 8 thattheJudgeweighedtheevidenceinamannerthatwasarbitrary,capricious,orcontraryto $t law.Adversedecisionaffirmed. ` _ CASENO_ :1504225.a1 8 DATE:02/17/2017 8 1s d d 8 ` h p DATE:February17,2017 \ . ؉ 7r (#(#. A Y ) x d E gA InRe: . { ApplicantforSecurityClearance S! A Y ) x d E*# gA +#{" ) " ) # ) $ ) % ) l&