WPC  +"VSUNl*x0U<87Slhg\[5-߬$JŀsIwK\AMc>LGH?<ֽ,-,EBoD:OBBƙM5hw~T~ _FɰS#D~jŪ uG;vUD GA]ȹʹ%_ eaOnY1N-9\kȣy5.)$/PpD*;GQYℳʎ^JxC󸵍m*Qlê*9"-x 픫3\i _zĐg>G?ٕϞ}g }u% ŽD'>bQ8puҬ۟p0t?dS% ]hnC6ؤyH'Ms,*,gNe&ugӖB%F(ғՋOȀ(#2 decision!securityconcernsraisedunderGuidelineG(AlcoholConsumption)andGuidelineF *)z$3 (FinancialConsiderations)ofDepartmentofDefenseDirective5220.6(Jan.2,1992,asamended) *f%4 (Directive).Applicantrequestedahearing.OnMarch24,2017,afterthehearing,DefenseOffice +R&5 ofHearingsandAppeals(DOHA)AdministrativeJudgeArthurE.Marshall,Jr.,deniedApplicants +>'6 requestforasecurityclearance.ApplicantappealedpursuanttoDirectiveE3.1.28andE3.1.30. ,*(7  -)8   TheJudgeresolvedtheGuidelineGallegationsinApplicantsfavor.Applicantsappeal  briefcontainsnoassertionofharmfulerroronthepartoftheJudgeregardingtheGuidelineF  securityconcerns.Rather,itcontainsabriefstatementbytheApplicantthathehasmadeagood  faithefforttocorrecthisfinancialproblems. t   Wedonotreviewacasedenovo.Ourauthoritytoreviewacaseislimitedtocasesinwhich L  theappealingpartyhasallegedthattheJudgecommittedharmfulerror.See,e.g.,_ISCR_ԀCaseNo. 8  1501734at12(App.Bd.Jan19,2017).Applicanthasnotmadeanallegationofharmfulerroron $ t thepartoftheJudge.Therefore,thedecisionoftheJudgeisAFFIRMED.  `    `     h     X XXX    `     h   Signed:Michael_Raanan_Ԁ      `     h   Michael_Raanan_      `     h   AdministrativeJudge      `     h   Chairperson,AppealBoard p    `     h   Signed:JamesE.Moody  p    `     h   JamesE.Moody  \    `     h   AdministrativeJudge H    `     h   Member,AppealBoard 4    `     h   Signed:WilliamS.Fields     `     h   WilliamS.Fields     `     h   AdministrativeJudge l    `     h   Member,AppealBoard#X XXX q#