WPC  @-e3V/ʣ۪ۺRqf@3ЀkKHo`N*V +^[lZq(#2 AdministrativeJudgeArthurE.Marshall,Jr.,deniedApplicantsrequestforasecurityclearance. *)z$3 ApplicantappealedpursuanttoDirectiveE3.1.28andE3.1.30. *f%4   Applicantraisedthefollowingissueonappeal:whethertheJudgesadversedecisionwas +>'6 arbitrary,capricious,orcontrarytolaw.Consistentwiththefollowing,weaffirm. ,*(7    -)8 Ї_  TheJudgesFindingsofFactandAnalysis     Singlewithtwochildren,Applicanthasworkedforherpresentemployerforaboutayear. t Shemakesaround$1,500everytwoweeks,whichisasignificantreductionfromthe$3,000she ` earnedeachpayperiodupuntil2009,whenshelostherjob.Shewasoutofworkforaboutnine L  months,buthersubsequentemploymententailedsignificantfluctuationsinherpayrate.Because 8  ofthesecircumstances,Applicantbeganexperiencingfinancialdifficulties. $ t   Applicanthasnumerousdelinquentdebts.Forexample,shehasseveraljudgmentsagainst  L  herresultingfromevictionsfromtwoapartmentcomplexes,avehiclerepossession,andnumerous  8  collectionaccountsfortelecommunicationservices,medicalexpenses,etc.TheJudgefoundthat $  Applicanthadnotprovidedevidenceofdebtresolution.HestatedthatApplicanthadfailedto   presentdocumentaryevidenceinsupportofherdisputeofcertaindebtsorherclaimtohave   attemptedtoresolveherfinancialproblems.     Discussion  p   Applicantreiterateshertestimonyabouthereffortatdebtresolution.Shealsodiscusses H mattersthatshebelievesprovidescontextforherfinancialdifficulties,suchasherstatusasasingle 4 mother,herunemployment,andherclaimthatshedidnotowecertaindebtsallegedinthe_SOR_.  p ApplicanthasnotrebuttedthepresumptionthattheJudgeconsideredalloftheevidenceinthe  \ record.NeitherhassheshownthattheJudgeweighedtheevidenceinamannerthatwasarbitrary, H capricious,orcontrarytolaw.See,e.g.,_ISCR_ԀCaseNo.1300502at3(App.Bd.Mar.7,2017). 4 Applicantstatesthatherbriefcontainsadditionalinformationconcerningherfinancialcondition.   However,wecannotconsidernewevidenceonappeal.DirectiveE3.1.29.     TheJudgeexaminedtherelevantevidenceandarticulatedasatisfactoryexplanationforthe  decision,principallythatApplicanthadnotcorroboratedhertestimonywithdocumentaryevidence. #  1      ׀  Thedecisionissustainableonthisrecord. Thegeneralstandardisthataclearancemaybegranted l onlywhenclearlyconsistentwiththeinterestsofthenationalsecurity.DepartmentoftheNavy X  v.Egan,484U.S.518,528(1988).SeealsoDirective,Enclosure22(b): Anydoubtconcerning D! personnelbeingconsideredforaccesstoclassifiedinformationwillberesolvedinfavorofthe 0"  nationalsecurity.  #l! @( Order     TheDecisionis AFFIRMED . `    `     h   Signed:WilliamS.Fields  d    `     h   WilliamS.Fields  P     `     h   AdministrativeJudge  <     `     h   Member,AppealBoard (     `     h   Signed:JamesE.Moody      `     h   JamesE.Moody t    `     h   AdministrativeJudge `    `     h   Member,AppealBoard L    `     h   Signed:JamesF.Duffy__ L    `     h   JamesF.Duffy 8    `     h   AdministrativeJudge $    `     h   Member,Appeal_Board___