WPC 7,ZDT,Z!: g%D&;x}6ߩS['c`:?*SdIMt;P9,Qt xu͜E9 j*:ƌzLE7჉xDOE;)痡ʗҀ _h՜ilo>pkL"P5bfB'iEZpb(2] el~~#7ĒU߂>Ų_wtaOYEǂ R*;y%AN@ uaea /B7ajJoSp~e^a,@gge`Jn"TjD]%۴igŌV%`2fj$9rz8lA=vB~Qꂑq)US9;zڷsZ5ҵF:9_o>{J |},?K~=WYPP5d5g*D0um_Ձ\#UN % 0:% ^ _ wk 4o   m Z 0U ZZ 0V 0 0~ 0De 0 0h 0! 0 0E( 0* 0 0f 0% 0 0 0D 0 0 0 0 0+ 0 0 0Y 0 0 03 0 0QQN BHewlett-Packard HP LaserJet P3010 Series0(9 Z6Times New Roman RegularX($USUS.,J;EJ*ntFold3|xU8DocumentManagement::ModifiedBooleanTRUE*+ (_2623  ..8DocumentManagement::ModifiedBooleanTRUE(.3$ !USUS.,  *D+D (_25   ," <DL,23  ..," <DL,   (.(3($ !USUS.,      0  (#$  0  *5+5 (_24  ) <DL)23  ..) <DL)  *2+2 (_23 ` &<<DL&23  ..&<<DL& ` */+/ (_22  #DL#23  ..#DL#  *,+, (_21   DL 23  .. DL  *)+) (_20 h DDL23  ..DDL h *&+& (_19  L23  ..L  *#+# (_18   L23  .. L  *>> (_17  2( 4 <DL223  Ԁ2( 4 <DL2  *DD (_16   ," <DL,23  Ԁ," <DL,   *55 (_15  ) <DL)23  Ԁ) <DL)  *22 (_14 ` &<<DL&23  Ԁ&<<DL& ` *// (_13  #DL#23  Ԁ#DL#  *,, (_12   DL 23  Ԁ DL  *)) (_11 h DDL23  ԀDDL h *&& (_10  L23  ԀL  (## &_9   L23  Ԁ L  (>> &_8  2( 4 <DL223  2( 4 <DL2  (DD &_7   ," <DL,23  ," <DL,   (55 &_6  ) <DL)23  ) <DL)  (22 &_5 ` &<<DL&23  &<<DL& ` (// &_4  #DL#23  #DL#  (,, &_3   DL 23   DL  ()) &_2 h DDL23  DDL h (&& &_1  L23  L  &## $_   L23   L   d !USUS.,  _KEYWORD:GuidelineF  DIGEST:ApplicantsappealbriefraisesnoallegationofharmfulerroronthepartoftheJudge.  Rather,itcontainsinformationthatshedidnotpreviouslypresenttotheJudge.TheAppeal t Boardcanneitherreceivenorconsiderthisnewevidence.Adversedecisionaffirmed. ` _CASENO_:1210211.a1 8  DATE:05/01/2017  ` _____________________________   `     h      p DATE:May1,2017  8  .؉7r(#(#.A[) xdEgA   InRe:       ApplicantforSecurityClearance / A[) xdEgA W )   )   ) p ) \ ) H ) 4 )  p )  \  H pX p _ISCR_ԀCaseNo.1210211 \"  H# .؉7r. \XXp  #    APPEALBOARDSUMMARYDISPOSITION  $ APPEARANCES '  &%XX FORGOVERNMENT  X ) JamesB.Norman,Esq.,ChiefDepartmentCounsel 0!*  FORAPPLICANT  "0,  Prose #X8X%&# #-     TheDepartmentofDefense(DoD)declinedtograntApplicantasecurityclearance.On R'"1 December11,2015,DoDissuedastatementofreasons(_SOR_)advisingApplicantofthebasisfor >(#2 thatdecision"securityconcernsraisedunderGuidelineF(FinancialConsiderations)ofDepartment *)z$3 ofDefenseDirective5220.6(Jan.2,1992,asamended)(Directive).Applicantrequestedahearing. *f%4 OnMarch22,2017,afterthehearing,AdministrativeJudgeJohnGrattanMetz,Jr.,denied +R&5 Applicantsrequestforasecurityclearance.ApplicantappealedpursuanttoDirectiveE3.1.28 +>'6 andE3.1.30. ,*(7    -)8   ApplicantsappealbriefraisesnoallegationofharmfulerroronthepartoftheJudge.  Rather,itcontainsinformationthatshedidnotpreviouslypresenttotheJudge.TheAppealBoard  canneitherreceivenorconsiderthisnewevidence.SeeDirectiveE3.1.29.  _  TheBoarddoesnotreviewcasesdenovo.TheAppealBoardsauthoritytoreviewacase t islimitedtocasesinwhichtheappealingpartyhasallegedtheJudgecommittedharmfulerror. ` BecauseApplicanthasnotmadeanallegationofharmfulerror,thedecisionoftheJudgedenying L  Applicantasecurityclearanceis AFFIRMED . 8       `     h   Signed:JamesE.Moody  <     `     h   JamesE.Moody (     `     h   AdministrativeJudge      `     h   Member,AppealBoard      `     h   Signed:WilliamS.Fields `    `     h   WilliamS.Fields L    `     h   AdministrativeJudge 8    `     h   Member,AppealBoard $t    `     h   Signed:JamesF.Duffy_____________________________________________________________________________ $    `     h   JamesF.Duffy     `     h   AdministrativeJudge     `     h   Member,AppealBoard