WPC  O!a"{ZOg_-V)Ȱ?Vgf$RCKj!wGFIs`/\nXO+(zov=HT f:Ǿ8C]ݳ)GrnU`$Ì2c^|s"ƚ",sOHF^k52wԙZ7ĭW6{lX',O`#@UN %W 0:] ^ w 4   m Z E= Z? N B Hewlett-Packard HP LaserJet P3010 Series0(9 Z6Times New Roman RegularX($USUS.,tJ;EJx3|xU8DocumentManagement::ModifiedBooleanTRUE8DocumentManagement::ModifiedBooleanTRUE d !USUS.,  _KEYWORD:GuidelineF  DIGEST:ApplicantassertstheJudgeerredbyfindinghishomeequityloanwasforinstillation  ofapool.TheJudgesfindingisbasedonApplicantspersonalsubjectinterview.Adverse t decisionaffirmed. ` _CASENO_:1405009.a1 8  DATE:05/24/2017  ` __   `     h      p DATE:May24,2017 $  .؉7r(#(#.A_ ) xdEgA   InRe:        W   ApplicantforSecurityClearance k A_ ) xdEgA C )   ) p ) \ ) H ) 4 )  p )  \ ) H  4  pX p ISCRCaseNo.1405009 H#  4$ .؉7r. \XXp  $    APPEALBOARDDECISION & APPEARANCES X )  &k%XX FORGOVERNMENT  0"+ JamesB.Norman,Esq.,ChiefDepartmentCounsel #X,  FORAPPLICANT  $ .  Prose #X8X%&k # % /       TheDepartmentofDefense(DoD)declinedtograntApplicantasecurityclearance.On R'"1 January15,2015,DoDissuedastatementofreasons(SOR)advisingApplicantofthebasisforthat >(#2 decision"securityconcernsraisedunderGuidelineF(FinancialConsiderations)ofDepartmentof *)z$3 DefenseDirective5220.6(Jan.2,1992,asamended)(Directive).Applicantrequestedthatthecase *f%4 bedecidedonthewrittenrecord.OnFebruary10,2017,afterconsideringtherecord,DefenseOffice +R&5 ofHearingsandAppealsAdministrativeJudgeLeRoyF.ForemandeniedApplicantsrequestfor +>'6 asecurityclearance.ApplicantappealedpursuanttotheDirectiveE3.1.28andE3.1.30. ,*(7  -)8   Inthiscase,ApplicantdidnotfilearesponsetotheGovernmentsFileofRelevantMaterial.  Hisbriefcontainsnewevidence,intheformofcharacterreferencelettersandaccountstatements  thatpostdatetheJudgesdecision,whichtheBoardcannotconsideronappeal.SeeDirective  E3.1.29. t   ApplicantassertstheJudgeerredbyfindinghishomeequityloanwasforinstallationofa L  pool.TheJudgesfindingisbasedonApplicantspersonalsubjectinterview.Applicantalsostates 8  itwouldmakenosensetousehisIRAtopaydebtsbecauseofthepenalties.TheJudgesfinding $ t andconclusionsinthisregardarosebecauseApplicanthadproposedtotakethataction.  `   TheBoarddoesnotreviewacasedenovo.TheBoardsauthoritytoreviewacaseislimited  8  tocasesinwhichtheappealingpartyhasallegedtheJudgecommittedharmfulerror.Applicanthas $  notdemonstratedanyharmfulerroronthepartoftheJudge.Therefore,thedecisionoftheJudge   denyingApplicantasecurityclearanceisAFFIRMED.      `     h    `    `     h   Signed:MichaelY.Raanan H    `     h   MichaelY.Raanan 4    `     h   AdministrativeJudge  p    `     h   Chairperson,AppealBoard  \    `     h   Signed:JamesF.Duffy     `     h   JamesF.Duffy     `     h   AdministrativeJudge     `     h   Member,AppealBoard l    `     h   Signed:WilliamS.Fields_____ $X"    `     h   WilliamS.Fields $D #    `     h   AdministrativeJudge %0!$    `     h   Member,AppealBoard &"%