ÿWPCN ^·i_Mº—¤}Èó@QäÚ0Ðò®^»¹]»Ÿiòr {m䟙£»]•Ê>‰~dìµ#< `ÔéTêøá ¹¦«ñi]™qÄš*òÔyédP¾Qs·usZ—ÝekéÉvl_Nf¦ôìÓß¿9V&PŽq Ìjdq$=°Ÿv^ä¯ñ¦1œòj®¡ôŸSbRÅ^–Ø‘áïìÖÙÄððw8›f¾ž­K{FNR‚ÜœË1[ˆOvä­˜½4 ¶¦—‰”ÐF=ÎV2¨ã/p9žø2^ýÆ’;ïGVØåTO‡€lfIʼn|ç‹:»§ÀhKr†Ÿ?soq†e¯––æÉnìX4áú¿?'SûÒ$ÃiÖTHL³È˜4 Ùæ­˜èôÀKnÂâ·p÷NYcŽ(2?¸û…yLxú¤C™Áz/+ºa˜½f?CE]dý.ÕÚ’è^.ŠÕ@’‹!ƨL­I¢¿D¢±ì¥?aØŠòM(òá)ÃôÖ.Es.t^/žJN{1P†$Ì܃Îj ý4y¦ ÏV„÷óö“­4Á"˜U¿5ðSq*`È¿3”P wtÁUódaìVM4ªBÆ’ÐMOX›Q{Aò¢„R†Z#ÉìUNµ % 0: ^ C wO 4S g v mx àZ àZé é EC 0DE 0©‰ j2 NœGž8å B1˜Hewlett-Packard HP LaserJet P3010 SeriesÈÈÈÈ0(ÖÃ9 Z‹6Times New Roman RegularX(üœ$¡¡ÔUSUS.,Ô±{ºJ;E•J3|xÿU‹ÿÿÿÿ8DocumentManagement::ModifiedBooleanTRUE8DocumentManagement::ModifiedBooleanTRUE(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó(Y(2ÎL$¤¤Ý ƒüœ!ÝÔUSUS.,ÔÝ  ÝÔ€ôxòXXÔÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó `Ý ƒÎL$ÝÔUSUS.,ÔÔ€ôxòXXÔÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝÔ_ÔThe€Judge€questioned€Applicant€in€some€detail€about€his€decision€to€represent€himself,€concluding€thatÐ ° ÐApplicant€possessed€the€requisite€ability.€€Tr.€at€5„9.€€We€note€evidence€that€Applicant€has€a€associateððs€degree€fromÐ tÄ Ðcollege€and€that€he€is€a€real€estate€agent,€both€of€which€suggest€that€he€is€able€to€understand€written€material€of€anÐ 8ˆ Ðequivalent€degree€of€complexity€as€that€of€the€Directive.€€€ =Ý ƒÎL$ÝÔUSUS.,ÔÔ€ôxòXXÔÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú3Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝÔ_ÔApplicant€argues€that€Department€Counselððs€questions€were€deficient€in€that€they€elicited€from€him€testimonyÐ ° Ðthat€was€not€true.€€As€stated€above,€we€find€nothing€improper€about€the€questions€themselves.€€If€Applicant€understoodÐ tÄ Ðthe€questions€to€be€eliciting€responses€that€were€not€accurate,€it€was€his€duty€to€notify€the€Judge.€€Althoughòò€pro€seÐ 8ˆ Ðóóapplicants€cannot€be€expected€to€act€like€lawyers,€they€are€expected€to€take€timely,€reasonable€steps€to€protect€their€rightsÐ üL Ðunder€the€Directive.€€òòSee,€e.g.óó,€Ô_ÔISCRÔ_Ô€Case€No.€12„02371€at€3€(App.€Bd.€Jun.€30,€2014). .Ý ƒÎL$ÝÔUSUS.,ÔÔ€ôxòXXÔÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú4Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝÔ_ÔAs€Applicant€notes€in€his€appeal€brief,€the€Judge€failed€to€enter€a€formal€finding€regarding€an€allegation€aboutÐ ° Ðhis€Chapter€13€bankruptcy€action.€€Ô_ÔSORÔ_Ô€ðð€1d.€€This€was€an€error,€insofar€as€Judges€are€expected€to€make€findings€andÐ tÄ Ðconclusions€regarding€each€allegation.€€Directive€ðð€E3.1.25.€€However,€even€if€he€had€entered€a€finding€on€this€allegationÐ 8ˆ Ðthat€was€favorable€to€Applicant,€it€would€not€have€resulted€in€a€different€overall€result,€in€light€of€his€sustainable€adverseÐ üL Ðfindings€discussed€above.€€Therefore,€this€clerical€error€is€harmless.€€ Ý ƒÎL$ÝÔUSUS.,ÔÔ€ôxòXXÔÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝÔ_ÔWe€construe€one€of€Applicantððs€€arguments€to€be€that€Department€Counsel€improperly€submitted€as€part€of€herÐ ° Ðcase€in€chief€documentary€evidence€that€she€had€received€from€Applicant€rather€than€from€her€own€independent€efforts.€Ð tÄ ÐThis€assertion€is€new€evidence,€which€we€cannot€consider.€€However,€we€fail€to€see€how€this€argument€on€its€faceÐ 8ˆ Ðconstitutes€an€allegation€of€error.€€There€is€nothing€inadmissible€about€anything€that€Department€Counsel€submitted,€and,Ð üL Ðin€any€event,€Applicant€did€not€object€to€Department€Counselððs€evidence.€€Tr.€at€16.€€ dÝ ƒüœ!ÝÔUSUS.,ÔÝ  ÝÔ_ÔKEYWORD:€Guideline€FÐ ° ÐÌDIGEST:€Applicant€argues€that€Department€Counsel€engaged€in€misconduct€and€did€not€complyÐ ˆØ Ðwith€discovery€procedures.€There€is€nothing€in€the€record€to€support€this€contention.€At€theÐ tÄ Ðhearing,€Applicant€agreed€that€Department€Counsel€had€complied€with€DOHA€requirements.Ð `° ÐAdverse€decision€affirmed.Ð L œ ÐÌÔ_ÔCASENOÔ_Ô:€15„06623.a1Ð $ t ÐÌDATE:€05/26/2017Ð ü L  ÐÔ_ÔÔ_ÔÔ_ÔÔ_ÔÔ_ÔÔ_ÔÔ_ÔÔ_ÔÔ_ÔÔ_ÔÔ_ÔÔ_ÔÔ_ÔÔ_ÔÔ_ÔÔ_ÔÔ_ÔÔ_ÔÔ_ÔÔ_ÔÔ_ÔÌÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àDATE:€May€26,€2017Ð À  ÐÌÌÌÒ.؉ð7r°(#°(#.ÒßA€Y) °°xdE°ogAßÐ pÀ ÐÌIn€Re:Ð k» ÐÌà  à„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„Ìà  à€Ð / ÐÌApplicant€for€Security€ClearanceÐ W ÐÌßA€Y) °°xdE°ÞgAßÐ ß/ Ð)Ð pÀ Ð)Ð \¬ Ð)Ð H˜ Ð)Ð 4„ Ð)Ð  p Ð)Ð  \ Ð)Ð øH Ð)Ð ä4  ÐÐ Ð ! ÐÓp°œXÓÌÌÌà p àÔ_ÔISCRÔ_Ô€Case€No.€15„06623Ð 4„$ ÐÐ  p% ÐÒ.؉ð7r°°.ÒÓ °\X›XpÓÐ ¨ø% Ðò òÓ  ÓAPPEAL€BOARD€DECISIONÐ ”ä& ÐÌÌòòAPPEARANCESóóÐ X ¨) Ðó óÌÔ‡&ïÿ%XXÔò òFOR€GOVERNMENTó óÐ 0"€+ ÐJames€B.€Norman,€Esq.,€Chief€Department€CounselÐ #X, ÐÌò òFOR€APPLICANTó óÐ ¸$ . ÐÔ_ÔRondaÔ_Ô€N.€Edgar,€Esq.Ô#†Xé¼X%&ïÿ®#ÔÐ %à / ÐÌÌÓ  Óà  àThe€Department€of€Defense€(DoD)€declined€to€grant€Applicant€a€security€clearance.€€On€MayÐ @(#2 Ð18,€2016,€DoD€issued€a€statement€of€reasons€(Ô_ÔSORÔ_Ô)€advising€Applicant€of€the€basis€for€thatÐ ,)|$3 Ðdecisionð!ðsecurity€concerns€raised€under€Guideline€F€(Financial€Considerations)€of€Department€ofÐ *h%4 ÐDefense€Directive€5220.6€(Jan.€2,€1992,€as€amended)€(Directive).€€Applicant€requested€a€hearing.€Ð +T&5 ÐOn€January€17,€2017,€after€the€hearing,€Defense€Office€of€Hearings€and€Appeals€(DOHA)Ð ð+@'6 ÐAdministrative€Judge€Mark€Harvey€denied€Applicantððs€request€for€a€security€clearance.€€ApplicantÐ Ü,,(7 Ðappealed€pursuant€to€Directive€ðððð€E3.1.28€and€E3.1.30.Ð È-)8 Їà  àApplicant€raised€the€following€issues€on€appeal:€whether€the€Judge€denied€him€due€processÐ ° Ðand€whether€the€Judgeððs€adverse€decision€was€arbitrary,€capricious,€or€contrary€to€law.€€ConsistentÐ œì Ðwith€the€following,€we€affirm.Ð ˆØ ÐÌÔ_Ôà  àò òThe€Judgeððs€Findings€of€Factó óÐ `° ÐÌà  àApplicant€has€worked€for€a€Defense€contractor€for€28€years€and€has€held€a€clearance€for€30.€Ð 8 ˆ ÐHe€served€in€the€military,€leaving€the€service€as€a€noncommissioned€officer.€€He€is€married€with€threeÐ $ t Ðchildren.Ð  ` ÐÌà  àIn€2004,€Applicant€bought€a€house.€€After€it€had€significantly€increased€in€value,€he€withdrewÐ è 8  Ðequity€and€purchased€three€more€as€investment€properties.€€The€first€and€second€mortgages€on€hisÐ Ô$  Ðresidence€were€$900,000€and€$200,000€respectively.€€Those€for€the€three€rental€properties€wereÐ À  Ð$1,200,000,€$600,000,€and€$286,000.€€The€value€of€the€properties€declined€after€a€€few€years.€€InÐ ¬ü  Ðaddition,€the€houses€were€financed€with€adjustable€rate€mortgages,€and€the€payments€doubled.€Ð ˜è  ÐApplicant€withdrew€funds€from€his€retirement€account€in€an€effort€to€hold€on€to€the€properties,€butÐ „Ô  Ðall€four€went€into€foreclosure.€€Although€he€was€a€real€estate€agent,€Applicant€claimed€that€he€didÐ pÀ Ðnot€realize€how€much€the€mortgage€payments€would€increase.€€Ð \¬ ÐÌà  àIn€addition,€both€the€IRS€and€state€tax€officials€advised€Applicant€that€he€owed€taxes€due€toÐ 4„ Ðdebt€forgiveness€after€the€foreclosure€sale.€€Applicant€filed€for€Chapter€7€bankruptcy€protection,Ð  p Ðwhich€he€believed€discharged€his€tax€debts.€€In€fact,€Applicantððs€Federal€tax€debt€was€resolved,€butÐ  \ Ðthe€state€debt€was€not.€€At€the€close€of€the€record,€he€owed€his€state€over€$126,000€in€past„due€taxes,Ð øH Ðinterest,€and€penalties.€€Prior€to€filing€for€bankruptcy,€Applicant€underwent€financial€counseling.€Ð ä4 ÐBefore€his€bankruptcy,€Applicant€purchased€two€vehicles,€with€a€combined€cost€of€nearly€$55,000.Ð Ð  ÐÌà  àIn€2015,€Applicant€filed€under€Chapter€13€of€the€bankruptcy€code€to€control€payments€on€hisÐ ¨ø Ðtaxes€and€on€debts€not€discharged€under€Chapter€7.€€The€documents€that€Applicant€submitted€do€notÐ ”ä Ðshow€any€funds€allocated€to€his€tax€debt.€€In€2016,€Applicant€purchased€a€timeshare.€€In€his€financialÐ €Ð Ðstatement,€Applicant€stated€that€his€monthly€income€is€$8,300.€€In€documents€related€to€his€ChapterÐ l¼ Ð13€filing€he€stated€that€his€and€his€wifeððs€combined€monthly€incomes€totaled€over€$20,000.€Ð X ¨ ÐApplicant€has€about€$300,000€in€his€retirement€account.€€Ð D!” ÐÌà  àApplicant€has€received€excellent€performance€evaluations.€€He€has€developed€two€patents€forÐ #l! Ðhis€employer.Ð $X" ÐÌà  àò òThe€Judgeððs€Analysisó óÐ à%0!$ ÐÌà  àThe€Judge€concluded€that€none€of€the€mitigating€conditions€were€entitled€to€full€application.€Ð ¸'#& ÐAlthough€some€events€affecting€Applicantððs€financial€problems€were€beyond€his€control,€such€as€theÐ ¤(ô#' Ðdecline€in€the€real€estate€market,€the€Judge€found€that€other€factors€were€due€to€Applicantððs€ownÐ )à$( Ðchoices.€€He€stated€that€the€debt€load€associated€with€the€four€properties€evidenced€a€lack€ofÐ |*Ì%) Ðjudgment€and€that€Applicant€did€not€demonstrate€that€it€was€necessary€for€all€four€to€go€intoÐ h+¸&* Ðforeclosure.€€He€stated€that€the€mere€fact€that€the€properties€declined€in€value€was€not€sufficient€toÐ T,¤'+ Ðshow€that€foreclosure€was€necessary.€€He€also€cited€to€evidence€that,€despite€being€on€notice€of€hisÐ @-(, Ðtax€debts,€he€made€no€payments€despite€having€the€financial€ability€to€establish€payment€plans.€€Ð ° ÐÌÌÌà  àò òDiscussionó óÐ `° ÐÌà  àApplicant€raises€numerous€assignments€of€error€that€appear€to€fall€under€the€category€of€dueÐ 8 ˆ Ðprocess.€€For€example,€he€claims€that€DoD€officials€improperly€failed€to€submit€enoughÐ $ t Ðinterrogatories€to€him,€thereby€resulting€in€an€incomplete€record.€€He€also€claims€that€the€SOR€wasÐ  ` Ðinsufficiently€detailed.€€We€have€no€authority€to€rule€on€the€manner€in€which€DoD€officials€performÐ ü L  Ðtheir€adjudication€duties,€although€we€note€that€Government€Exhibit€3€consists€of€nearly€60€pagesÐ è 8  Ðworth€of€interrogatories€that€Applicant€had€answered€during€the€processing€of€his€case.€€òòSee,€e.g.óó,Ð Ô$  ÐISCR€Case€No.€14„04186€at€3„4€(App.€Bd.€Oct.€28,€2015).€€An€SOR€is€an€example€of€noticeÐ À  Ðpleading,€and€it€does€not€have€to€allege€every€fact€that€might€be€relevant€at€a€hearing.€€òòSee,€e.g.óó,€ISCRÐ ¬ü  ÐCase€No.€14„06440€at€3„4€(App.€Bd.€Jan.€8,€2016).€€In€this€case,€the€SOR€was€sufficient€to€place€aÐ ˜è  Ðreasonable€person€on€notice€of€the€concerns€in€Applicantððs€case.Ð „Ô  ÐÌà  àApplicant€contends€that€he€was€prejudiced€by€not€having€been€represented€by€an€attorney.€Ð \¬ ÐHe€also€claims€that€he€was€not€able€to€know€what€kind€of€evidence€he€should€provide€in€mitigationÐ H˜ Ðor€understand€his€burden€of€persuasion.€€The€record€shows€that€Applicant€received€detailed€noticeÐ 4„ Ðof€his€rights.€€For€example,€he€received€Pre„hearing€Guidance€from€the€Chief€Administrative€Judge.€Ð  p ÐThis€memorandum€described€the€adversarial€nature€of€the€hearing,€Applicantððs€right€to€hire€anÐ  \ Ðattorney€at€his€own€expense,€his€right€to€present€evidence,€etc.€€It€notified€Applicant€of€theÐ øH Ðprocedures€that€would€be€followed€during€the€course€of€the€hearing,€including€his€right€to€object€toÐ ä4 Ðevidence€and€cross„examine€witnesses.€€This€guidance€also€described€the€procedures€governingÐ Ð  Ðdiscovery€between€the€parties.€€In€addition,€Applicant€received€a€copy€of€the€Directive,€which€alsoÐ ¼  Ðdescribes€the€rights€and€obligations€of€applicants€at€a€DOHA€proceeding,€including€the€right€toÐ ¨ø Ðcounsel€and€the€burden€of€persuasion.€€Before€taking€evidence,€the€Judge€explained€the€proceduresÐ ”ä Ðthat€would€be€used€during€the€course€of€the€proceeding,€and€Applicant€stated€that€he€understoodÐ €Ð Ðthem.€€Tr.€at€9„10.€€Applicant€was€provided€with€sufficient€guidance€as€to€his€rights,€and€a€reviewÐ l¼ Ðof€the€transcript€discloses€no€reason€to€believe€that€he€did€not€understand€them.׃×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€€Ð X ¨ ÐÌà  àApplicant€argues€that€Department€Counsel€engaged€in€some€sort€of€misconduct,€contending,Ð 0"€  Ðamong€other€things,€that€she€did€not€comply€with€discovery€procedures.€€There€is€nothing€in€theÐ #l! Ðrecord€to€support€this€contention.€€The€Judge€questioned€the€parties€about€pre„hearing€discovery,€andÐ $X" ÐApplicant€agreed€that€Department€Counsel€had€complied€with€DOHA€requirements.€€Tr.€at€11„12.€Ð ô$D # ÐOtherwise€Applicant€has€failed€to€allege€with€specificity€any€misconduct€that€Department€CounselÐ à%0!$ Ðis€supposed€to€have€committed.€€òòSee,€e.g.óó,€ISCR€Case€No.€15„03411€at€3€(App.€Bd.€Feb.€24,€2017)Ð Ì&"% Ðconcerning€a€partyððs€duty€to€frame€appeal€issues€with€sufficient€specificity€that€reviewing€authoritiesÐ ¸'#& Ðare€able€to€address€them.€€€Our€review€of€the€transcript€and€the€record€as€a€whole€discloses€nothingÐ ¤(ô#' Ðimproper€about€her€conduct€in€the€case.׃×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×Ð ° ÐÌà  àApplicant€argues€that€the€Judge€erred€by€being€a€passive€participant,€contending€that€heÐ ˆØ Ðshould€have€assisted€Applicant€in€presenting€his€case€and€should€have€sought€additional€mitigatingÐ tÄ Ðevidence.€€However,€a€Judge€has€no€authority€to€take€sides€in€a€case,€conduct€further€investigation,Ð `° Ðetc.€€Applicantððs€argument€amounts€to€nothing€more€than€that€the€Judge€acted€as€an€impartial€fact„Ð L œ Ðfinder,€which€was€what€the€proper€exercise€of€the€Judgeððs€duties€required.€€òòSee,€e.g.óó,€ISCR€Case€No.Ð 8 ˆ Ð14„03062€at€3€(App.€Bd.€Sep.€11,€€2015).€€Ð $ t ÐÌà  àApplicant€contends€that€the€Judge€erred€by€permitting€Department€Counsel€to€ask€leadingÐ ü L  Ðquestions€and€by€not€holding€the€record€open€after€the€hearing€for€the€submission€of€additionalÐ è 8  Ðevidence.€€There€is€nothing€improper€in€the€manner€in€which€Department€Counsel€questionedÐ Ô$  ÐApplicant.׃d×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú3Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€€Moreover,€at€the€end€of€the€hearing€the€Judge€asked€Applicant€if€he€wanted€anÐ À  Ðopportunity€to€present€additional€evidence,€and€he€replied€that€he€did€not.€€Tr.€at€51„52.€€Ð ¬ü  ÐÌà  àThough€he€may€understandably€be€disappointed€by€the€Judgeððs€decision,€we€can€find€noÐ „Ô  Ðreason€to€believe€that€Applicant€was€denied€adequate€notice€as€to€his€rights€and€obligations€at€theÐ pÀ Ðhearing.€€After€considering€the€entirety€of€Applicantððs€due€process€arguments€in€light€of€the€recordÐ \¬ Ðas€a€whole,€we€conclude€that€he€was€not€denied€the€due€process€afforded€by€the€Directive.€€òòSee,€e.g.óó,Ð H˜ ÐISCR€Case€No.€15„04472€at€3€(App.€Bd.€Feb.€9,€2017).€€Having€decided€to€represent€himself€duringÐ 4„ Ðthe€hearing,€Applicant€cannot€fairly€complain€about€the€quality€of€his€self„representation€or€seek€toÐ  p Ðbe€relieved€of€the€consequences€of€his€decision€to€represent€himself.òò€€See,€e.g.óó,€€ISCR€Case€No.€11„Ð  \ Ð08118€at€2„3€(App.€Bd.€Aug.€12,€2013).€€Applicant€requests€that€we€remand€the€case€for€the€purposeÐ øH Ðof€taking€in€additional€evidence.€€In€doing€so,€he€discusses€matters€from€outside€the€record,€whichÐ ä4 Ðwe€cannot€consider.€€Directive€ðð€E3.1.29.€€We€have€no€authority€to€remand€a€case€merely€in€orderÐ Ð  Ðto€supplement€the€record€with€additional€evidence.€€òòSee,€e.g.óó,€ISCR€Case€No.€15„02957€at€3„4€(App.Ð ¼  ÐBd.€Feb.€17,€2017).€€Ð ¨ø ÐÌà  àApplicantððs€challenge€to€the€Judgeððs€decision€is,€in€effect,€a€challenge€to€the€JudgeððsÐ €Ð Ðweighing€of€the€evidence.€€Among€other€things,€he€argues€that€the€Judge€did€not€address€the€extentÐ l¼ Ðto€which€Applicant€had€resolved€his€financial€problems.€€However,€the€Judgeððs€material€findings€areÐ X ¨ Ðconsistent€with€the€record€that€was€before€him.€€These€findings€support€his€conclusion€thatÐ D!” ÐApplicantððs€financial€problems€resulted€for€the€most€part€from€his€own€poor€judgment€andÐ 0"€  Ðinattention€to€legal€responsibilities€such€as€addressing€his€tax€delinquencies.€€A€Judge€is€required€toÐ #l! Ðevaluate€an€applicantððs€financial€problems€for€what€they€may€reveal€about€the€applicantððs€judgmentÐ ° Ðand€reliability,€which€are€characteristics€essential€to€protecting€classified€information.€€€òòSee,€e.g.,Ð œì ÐóóISCR€Case€No.€15„01737€at€3€(App.€Bd.€Feb.€14,€€2017).€€We€find€no€reason€to€conclude€that€theÐ ˆØ ÐJudgeððs€analysis€failed€in€this€regard.€€Applicant€has€not€demonstrated€that€the€Judge€weighed€theÐ tÄ Ðevidence€in€a€manner€that€was€arbitrary,€capricious,€or€contrary€to€law.€òò€See,€e.g.óó,€ISCR€Case€No.€15„Ð `° Ð08842€at€3€(App.€Bd.€Feb.€14,€2017).Ð L œ ÐÌà  àThe€Judge€examined€the€relevant€evidence€and€articulated€a€satisfactory€explanation€for€theÐ $ t Ðdecision.׃×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú4Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€€The€decision€is€sustainable€on€this€record.€€ð ðThe€general€standard€is€that€a€clearance€mayÐ  ` Ðbe€granted€only€when€ððclearly€consistent€with€the€interests€of€the€national€security.ðððð€€òòDepartmentÐ ü L  Ðof€the€Navy€v.€Eganóó,€484€U.S.€518,€528€(1988).€€òòSee€alsoóó€Directive,€Enclosure€2€ðð€2(b):€€ð ðAny€doubtÐ è 8  Ðconcerning€personnel€being€considered€for€access€to€classified€information€will€be€resolved€in€favorÐ Ô$  Ðof€the€national€security.ððÐ À  ÐÌà@ââ(ìàò òOrderó óˆÐ ˜è  ÐÌà  àThe€Decision€is€ò òAFFIRMEDó ó.€€€€Ð pÀ ÐÌÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àòòSigned:€William€S.€Fields€€€€€€€€€€€€€óóÐ 8ˆ Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àWilliam€S.€FieldsÐ $t Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àAdministrative€JudgeÐ ` Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àMember,€Appeal€BoardÐ üL ÐÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àòòSigned:€James€E.€Moody€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€óóÐ À Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àJames€E.€MoodyÐ ¬ü Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àAdministrative€JudgeÐ ˜è Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àMember,€Appeal€BoardÐ „Ô ÐÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àòòSigned:€James€F.€Duffy€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€óóÐ H!˜ Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àJames€F.€DuffyÐ 4"„  Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àAdministrative€JudgeÐ  #p! Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àMember,€Appeal€BoardÐ  $\" Ð