WPC \&  z"U%xyo3v@A.״Bg|r/mWLc-YnAG}[(Fur+Stވ>:UEa-MDz  n 4PˆG&sޝ;՘\x)NzJ8|6 Hp=d^[sJߦzr7ANDBhn7T+gM/ )ds"}TzO:7%B?֢vpuosωWyȣzWᾯֆWw|!0-Y<$Lf;47Y^EO"5Xa"I,]t-"}u<Z#UN % 0: ZC ^ w 4   m Z NC NE 0G G 0D E4 N4 6 t BsHewlett-Packard HP LaserJet P3010 Series0(9 Z6Times New Roman RegularX($USUS.,8DocumentManagement::ModifiedBooleanTRUEa2K;EJ:i+003|xU8DocumentManagement::ModifiedBooleanTRUE(Y(20$ !USUS.,  XX      0  (#$  0    0$USUS.,XX      1    _ApplicantdoesnotarguethattheJudgefailedtoconsiderthisevidenceorthatshemisweighedit.However,  totheextentthatsuchanargumentisimplicitinhisreferencetoit,hehasnotrebuttedthepresumptionthattheJudge t consideredalloftheevidenceintherecord,norhasheshownthattheJudgeweighedtheevidenceinamannerthatwas 8 arbitrary,capricious,orcontrarytolaw.See,e.g.,_ISCR_ԀCaseNo.1300502at3(App.Bd.Mar.7,2017). j 0$USUS.,XX      2    _Evenso,weconcludethat,hadthisinformationbeenincludedintherecordevidence,itwouldnothaveled  toadifferentresult.XXԀ#XX'# d !USUS.,  _KEYWORD:Guideline:F  DIGEST:Applicantsbrief,viewedinitstotality,doesnotmakeanassertionofharmfulerrorby  theJudge.Ourjurisdictionislimitedtothosecasesinwhichtheappealingpartyallegessuchan t error.Adversedecisionaffirmed. ` _CASENO_:1600556.a1 8  DATE:09/18/2017  `    `     h      p DATE:September18,2017  8  .؉7r(#(#.AY) xdEgA   InRe:        W ApplicantforSecurityClearance / AY) xdEgA W )   )   ) p ) \ ) H ) 4 )  p )  \  H pX p _ISCR_ԀCaseNo.1600556 \"  H# .؉7r. \XXp  #    APPEALBOARDSUMMARYDISPOSITION  $ APPEARANCES '  &%XX FORGOVERNMENT  X ) JamesB.Norman,Esq.,ChiefDepartmentCounsel 0!*  FORAPPLICANT  "0,  Prose #XX%&# #-     TheDepartmentofDefense(DoD)declinedtograntApplicantasecurityclearance.OnMay f&!0 23,2016,DoDissuedastatementofreasons(_SOR_)advisingApplicantofthebasisforthat R'"1 decision!securityconcernsraisedunderGuidelineF(FinancialConsiderations)ofDepartmentof >(#2 DefenseDirective5220.6(Jan.2,1992,asamended)(Directive).Applicantrequestedadecision *)z$3 onthewrittenrecord.OnJune30,2017,afterconsideringtherecord,DefenseOfficeofHearings *f%4 andAppeals(DOHA)AdministrativeJudgeErinC.HogandeniedApplicantsrequestforasecurity +R&5 clearance.ApplicantappealedpursuanttoDirectiveE3.1.28andE3.1.30. +>'6   Applicantacknowledgesattheoutsetthathefailedin owninguptohisfinancial -)8 responsibilities.Heforthrightlystatesthat theJudgewascorrectwith[her]decision[.]Appeal  Briefat1.Hegoesontodescribecircumstancesthataffectedhisdilatorytaxreturnfilingsandpast  duetaxpayments.Hecitestorecordevidencethathisreturnshavebynowbeenfiledandthathe  hasattemptedtosecurepaymentsplanswiththeIRS._ #  1      _ԀInadditiontothesethings,Applicantsbrief t includesasubstantialamountofnewevidence,whichtheDirectivedoesnotpermitustoconsider. #  2       ` DirectiveE3.1.29. L    Applicantsbrief,viewedinitstotality,doesnotmakeanassertionofharmfulerrorbythe $ t Judge.Ourjurisdictionislimitedtothosecasesinwhichtheappealingpartyallegessuchanerror.  ` DirectiveE3.1.32.Accordingly,theJudgesdecisionisAFFIRMED.  L     `     h   Signed:MichaelY._Raanan_Ԁ      `     h   MichaelY._Raanan_      `     h   AdministrativeJudge      `     h   Chairperson,AppealBoard p    `     h   Signed:JamesE.Moody  p    `     h   JamesE.Moody  \    `     h   AdministrativeJudge H    `     h   Member,AppealBoard 4    `     h   Signed:JamesF.Duffy______     `     h   JamesF.Duffy     `     h   AdministrativeJudge l    `     h   Member,AppealBoard