%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-06-24T10:56:41-04:00
2021-06-24T10:56:40-04:00
2021-06-24T10:56:41-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
02-13190.h1
uuid:c4cc1489-91fc-4940-aca1-b38d27e53176
uuid:bf5dd401-9729-4624-a31e-22e53ee528ea
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
19 0 obj
<><><><>]/P 17 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
23 0 obj
[29 0 R 30 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(02-13190.h1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(omputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archive\
d%20-%20HTML/02-13190.h1.html)Tj
49.129 0 Td
([6/24/2021 10:56:41 AM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: February 20, 2003)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(------------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 02-13190)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
14.419 -2.125 Td
(DECISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE)Tj
5.446 -2.125 Td
(JAMES A. YOUNG)Tj
0.569 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 517.5 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 493.5 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-6.359 -2.2 Td
(Erin C. Hogan, Esq., Deputy Chief Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
7.137 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-0.3 -2.267 Td
(Caram J. Abood, Esq)Tj
12 0 0 12 352.3386 418.5 Tm
(.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
-6.317 -2.125 Td
(SYNOPSIS)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 276.5312 392.25 cm
0 0 m
58.688 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 367.5 Tm
(Applicant, a 40-year-old computer software engineer, immigrated to the U\
.S. from India. )Tj
35.85 0 Td
(The Government alleged)Tj
-35.85 -1.125 Td
(foreign preference and foreign influence )Tj
16.408 0 Td
(security concerns based on his possession of an Indian passport and havi\
ng)Tj
-16.408 -1.125 Td
(immediate family members who are citizens and residents of India. )Tj
27.13 0 Td
(The evidence )Tj
5.608 0 Td
(established that Applicant now has a)Tj
-32.738 -1.125 Td
(U.S. passport and his Indian passport was canceled. )Tj
20.912 0 Td
(The members of his immediate family living in India are not foreign)Tj
-20.912 -1.125 Td
(agents or in a position to be exploited in such a way as to force Applic\
ant to choose between loyalty to his family and to)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(the U.S. )Tj
(Applicant established that it is )Tj
15.859 0 Td
(in the national interest to grant his clearance. )Tj
18.187 0 Td
(Clearance is granted.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
-16.489 -2.125 Td
(STATEMENT OF THE CASE)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 226.6914 273.75 cm
0 0 m
158.367 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 249 Tm
(Applicant, an employee of a defense contractor, applied for a security c\
learance so he could work with classified)Tj
T*
(information. )Tj
5.221 0 Td
(The Defense Office of Hearings )Tj
13.077 0 Td
(and Appeals \(DOHA\), the federal agency tasked with determining an)Tj
-18.298 -1.125 Td
(applicant's eligibility for access to classified information, was unable\
to make the )Tj
32.754 0 Td
(affirmative finding that it is in the)Tj
-32.754 -1.375 Td
(national interest to grant Applicant a clearance. )Tj
19.158 0 Td
(In accordance with the applicable Executive Order)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 489.1094 210 Tm
( \(1\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
q 1 0 0 1 489.1094 209.25 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 502.9155 205.5 Tm
( and Department)Tj
-40.576 -1.375 Td
(of )Tj
(Defense Directive,)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 118.9492 193.5 Tm
( \(2\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 118.9492 192.75 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 132.7554 189 Tm
( DOHA issued a Statement of Reasons \(SOR\) on 13 June 2002 detailing wh\
y a clearance was)Tj
-9.73 -1.125 Td
(not granted and recommending Applicant's )Tj
17.481 0 Td
(case be referred to an administrative judge to determine whether the)Tj
-17.481 -1.125 Td
(clearance should be denied/revoked. )Tj
14.799 0 Td
(In the SOR, DOHA alleged Applicant failed to meet )Tj
21.217 0 Td
(the foreign preference)Tj
-36.016 -1.125 Td
(\(Guideline C\) and foreign influence \(Guideline B\) personnel security\
guidelines.)Tj
9.75 0 0 9.75 16 124.5 Tm
(Applicant answered the SOR in a writing, dated 26 July 2002, that was no\
tarized on 30 July 2002. )Tj
39.521 0 Td
(Applicant requested that a decision be made)Tj
-39.521 -1.231 Td
(without a )Tj
4 0 Td
(hearing. )Tj
3.499 0 Td
(On 1 November 2002, Applicant, through an attorney, requested a hearing \
before an administrative judge. )Tj
42.681 0 Td
(The case was)Tj
-50.179 -1.231 Td
(originally assigned to )Tj
8.86 0 Td
(Administrative Judge John Erck on 8 November 2002 and, due to Judge Erck\
's caseload, was transferred to Administrative)Tj
-8.86 -1.231 Td
(Judge Claude Heiny. )Tj
8.609 0 Td
(On 18 )Tj
(December 2002, the case was transferred to me because of the region rota\
tion of judges. )Tj
38.236 0 Td
(A hearing was scheduled for 7)Tj
-46.846 -1.231 Td
(January 2003. )Tj
(At the request of )Tj
12.802 0 Td
(Applicant and his attorney, the hearing was delayed until 4 February 200\
3. )Tj
30.159 0 Td
(On that date, I convened a hearing to)Tj
-42.961 -1.231 Td
(consider whether it is clearly consistent with )Tj
18.079 0 Td
(the national interest to grant Applicant's security clearance. )Tj
23.921 0 Td
(The Government's case consisted of six)Tj
-42 -1.231 Td
(exhibits. )Tj
3.667 0 Td
(Applicant testified on his own behalf and )Tj
16.746 0 Td
(submitted 12 exhibits, 3 of which are attached to his Answer to the SOR.\
)Tj
29.439 0 Td
(A transcript \(Tr.\) of the)Tj
-49.852 -1.231 Td
(proceeding was received on 13 February 2003.)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
26 0 obj
('Xw3)
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
33 0 obj
<>
endobj
34 0 obj
<>stream
H\Qk@>q nf
(xJVdwnih:SZuG=1[m~fr;|_'i?m:{tQ=uxvGn+z:=Y[3h.b~?vr~_R:Mg®_ZgǎOEa_̶"{YO'3!o[L
nݪlek.]<==<===<===<===<===<=}<|݅9a G#r}}2gW`.` 4F&}Y{KFly0U})_
endstream
endobj
35 0 obj
<>stream
H|y\TG5o^p rGԸh4&K<0fW#qcԍ"(IT/ODT@oWq?u1G~z@ 0ѬE1s*$&.56_ rㆧo\
Թ
&Om;PvSF%7P;b~5H'k$~">CRGvSIÀZzؑi
9xuM7MMeЫ
A
MHD4z&IJ֔@^^$PߴR5$k4zI'I{}G&=u4@U@Ggj3 )rW j
\ OQkᔴ2n^}j [~Ah
UkԸMެ-Z~V|_">iۮ}Ȏv.]}=ǿU}uXOH4 y`JiCKfFv츌&Oɚ:mfϙ;o~di+VZƼv
Mnݶx]Kݷ>r'O_x WZ*C/ q444Bʐir\.7Ir,?qCv2{Π䠁A93(AJ'SQV*۔2bQ+!00ðİ888߸֤1k
07)ƦM]LMOQQ=U_6TCզjW34u\ݨL=Vw"ڇEńŅ%
4#<0O_?)%,yOADWrrMy<;ѐne`6fgp-83c;j8R5 Nk8%%N1k4̓NكmsU}VGap9;ƻ89oB'ocV^]7í
:Xz,N-eymn6mMilx|\_{=2rETrs=rHeКWlYjld~dmemimnml5YXdydYYXn,喽RKltDZ:XB-&|{k-KŊMn%nmx_$QH----|^&<L ŽE"T>Vr