%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-06-24T11:04:58-04:00
2021-06-24T11:04:57-04:00
2021-06-24T11:04:58-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
02-23477.h1
uuid:13ce667e-d144-40c0-8ffa-f75c9197e3a4
uuid:58020c29-bb33-4f26-b946-edd4df828aa3
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
19 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
20 0 obj
<>
endobj
21 0 obj
<>
endobj
23 0 obj
[22 0 R 22 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
[22 0 R 22 0 R]
endobj
25 0 obj
[22 0 R 22 0 R]
endobj
26 0 obj
[22 0 R 22 0 R]
endobj
27 0 obj
[22 0 R 22 0 R]
endobj
28 0 obj
[22 0 R 22 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
<><><><><><><><><><>]/P 20 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
29 0 obj
[35 0 R]
endobj
30 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(02-23477.h1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(omputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archive\
d%20-%20HTML/02-23477.h1.html)Tj
49.129 0 Td
([6/24/2021 11:04:57 AM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 624.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 623.9997 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 623.25 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 623.9997 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.751 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: )Tj
(November 29, 2004)Tj
0 -2.75 TD
(In re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(--------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 02-23477)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
14.419 -2.125 Td
(DECISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE)Tj
4.029 -2.125 Td
(MICHAEL H. LEONARD)Tj
1.986 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 523.5 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 499.5 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-5.234 -2.2 Td
(Erin C. Hogan, Deputy Chief Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
6.012 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-0.235 -2.2 Td
(Richard Murray, Esq.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 276.5312 399.75 Tm
(SYNOPSIS)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 276.5312 399 cm
0 0 m
58.688 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 374.25 Tm
(Applicant has met his ultimate burden by explaining and mitigating the r\
ecord evidence presented against him)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(suggesting he was terminated in September 2000)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
19.857 0 Td
(for using a company credit card for $1,000 of personal expenses and)Tj
-19.857 -1.125 Td
(then making a false entry in his employer's financial records that he ha\
d reimbursed the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
35.196 0 Td
(company for the expenditure.)Tj
-35.196 -1.125 Td
(Clearance is granted.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.558 -2.125 Td
(STATEMENT OF THE CASE)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-17.558 -2.125 Td
(On August 26, 2003, the Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals \(DOHA\) \
issued to Applicant a Statement of Reasons)Tj
0 -1.375 TD
(\(SOR\) stating the reasons why DOHA)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(proposed to deny or revoke access to classified information for Applican\
t.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 558.8711 270.75 Tm
( \(1\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
q 1 0 0 1 558.8711 270 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 572.6772 266.25 Tm
( The)Tj
-46.39 -1.125 Td
(SOR, which is in essence the administrative complaint, alleges a securit\
y)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
29.465 0 Td
(concern under Guideline E for personal)Tj
-29.465 -1.125 Td
(conduct. The crux of the allegation is that Applicant was terminated fro\
m his employment with a defense contractor in)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(September 2000 for using a company credit card for $1,000 of personal ex\
penses and then making a false entry in his)Tj
T*
(employer's financial records that he had)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.174 0 Td
(reimbursed the company for the expenditure. Applicant responded to the S\
OR)Tj
-16.174 -1.125 Td
(in writing, dated September 19, 2003, and he denied the SOR allegation w\
ithout)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
32.327 0 Td
(explanation; he also requested a)Tj
-32.327 -1.125 Td
(hearing.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Department Counsel indicated she was ready to proceed on June 23, 2004, \
and the case was assigned to another)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(administrative judge on July 8, 2004. The case)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
18.885 0 Td
(was reassigned to me July 15, 2004. With the agreement of counsel, a)Tj
-18.885 -1.125 Td
(notice of hearing was issued scheduling )Tj
16.163 0 Td
(the hearing for August 4, 2004. Applicant)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.969 0 Td
(appeared with counsel and the)Tj
-33.131 -1.125 Td
(hearing took place as scheduled. Government Exhibits 1 -5 were admitted \
and Applicant Exhibits A and B were)Tj
T*
(admitted.)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
3.999 0 Td
(Applicant called two character witnesses, one expert witness, and testif\
ied himself. I left the record open to)Tj
-3.999 -1.125 Td
(allow Applicant the opportunity to submit an)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
18.248 0 Td
(additional record, but I received a letter from his counsel explaining t\
he)Tj
-18.248 -1.125 Td
(record could not be found. I received the hearing transcript August 20, \
2004.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
19.406 -2.125 Td
(FINDINGS OF FACT)Tj
ET
0 G
q 1 0 0 1 248.8721 52.5 cm
0 0 m
114.006 0 l
h
S
Q
EMC
endstream
endobj
31 0 obj
<>
endobj
32 0 obj
(ϒ45UF)
endobj
33 0 obj
<>
endobj
34 0 obj
<>
endobj
38 0 obj
<>
endobj
39 0 obj
<>stream
H\͊0y9? B-x=;.l@ϙDEy*];BzSMlp[:ۚߦ52>(9aW\-X⫨UwC7ByK_!V|;N+;9ydޯE_bZ9dZBg响]]%|8)zf
ĉp¼0)[-NxǼ3G#s!\0OnaLf-=xjSfO-=P=)s6e