%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-06-24T11:04:57-04:00
2021-06-24T11:04:56-04:00
2021-06-24T11:04:57-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
02-23437.h1
uuid:12672a63-3781-488a-b98f-676cd85dc428
uuid:fe85b619-30a4-4982-ab79-334aa1e8f4a4
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
23 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
19 0 obj
<><><><><><>]/P 17 0 R/Pg 12 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
12 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
24 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(02-23437.h1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(omputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archive\
d%20-%20HTML/02-23437.h1.html)Tj
49.129 0 Td
([6/24/2021 11:04:57 AM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: February 24, 2004)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(--------------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 02-23437)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
14.419 -2.125 Td
(DECISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE)Tj
4.473 -2.125 Td
(CHARLES D. ABLARD)Tj
1.542 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 517.5 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 493.5 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-4.303 -2.2 Td
(Jennifer Campbell, Esq., Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
5.081 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-1.033 -2.267 Td
(Daniel D. Sorenson)Tj
12 0 0 12 336.5867 418.5 Tm
(, Esq.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
-5.005 -2.125 Td
(SYNOPSIS)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 276.5312 392.25 cm
0 0 m
58.688 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 367.5 Tm
(Applicant is a 42-year-old employee of a defense contractor working as a\
senior engineer.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant has held a security clearance for the past 16 years while he w\
as employed by other defense contractors and)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(the Navy. Applicant was discharged in)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.746 0 Td
(1991 by a former employer for use of the internet to view pornography on\
two)Tj
-15.746 -1.125 Td
(occasions in violation of company computer policy. Applicant has an)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
27.965 0 Td
(unblemished outstanding record of employment)Tj
-27.965 -1.125 Td
(both before and after the termination. He has received counseling after \
his discharge. Clearance is granted.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.558 -2.125 Td
(STATEMENT OF THE CASE)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 226.6914 275.25 cm
0 0 m
158.367 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 250.5 Tm
(On August 11, 2003, the Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals \(DOHA\) \
pursuant to Executive Order 10865,)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
T*
(Safeguarding Information Within Industry,)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
17.166 0 Td
( as)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(amended and modified, and Department of Defense Directive 5220.6,)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
-17.166 -1.125 Td
(Defense Industrial Personnel Security)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
15.247 0 Td
( )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
(Clearance Review Program )Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
11.664 0 Td
(\(Directive\), dated)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
7.302 0 Td
(January 2, 1992, as amended and)Tj
-34.212 -1.125 Td
(modified, issued a Statement of Reasons \(SOR\) to Applicant which detai\
led reasons why DOHA could not make the)Tj
T*
(preliminary affirmative finding under the Directive that it is clearly c\
onsistent with the national interest to grant or)Tj
T*
(continue a security clearance for Applicant.)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
17.686 0 Td
(DOHA recommended the case be referred to an administrative judge to)Tj
-17.686 -1.125 Td
(determine whether a clearance should be granted, continued, denied, or r\
evoked.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(In a sworn written statement, dated September 5, 2003, Applicant respond\
ed to the allegations set forth in the SOR, and)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(requested a hearing. The case was)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
13.854 0 Td
(assigned to me on December 3, 2003. A hearing was held on December 12, 2\
003.)Tj
-13.854 -1.125 Td
(The Government and the Applicant each introduced three exhibits at the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
29.128 0 Td
(hearing. All exhibits were accepted into)Tj
-29.128 -1.125 Td
(evidence. The transcript was received on December 31, 2003.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
19.406 -2.125 Td
(FINDINGS OF FACT)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 248.8721 77.25 cm
0 0 m
114.006 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 52.5 Tm
(Applicant has admitted the specific factual allegation in the SOR relati\
ng to the internet violation but denied the)Tj
ET
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
12 0 0 12 16 39 Tm
(implications of the admission. The admission)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
18.415 0 Td
(is incorporated herein as a finding of fact. After a complete review of \
the)Tj
ET
EMC
Q
endstream
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
26 0 obj
(\rtEQ*#h)
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
29 0 obj
<>
endobj
34 0 obj
<>
endobj
35 0 obj
<>stream
H\n0yCEK!n%4Vh0(o?;:iH/J|Xnѻln;x/xƺ|QE\-ӌ}Ae>hq+}髨V:n=Yot[JRu:
a벡n^sQa;48E_+lCO3=B[viwU͆B`> ]`9NfM86)OcYr3a 64{k\#>a,yLȳ3a7#w4|Gs>2agsWKE}`oSw9(~կ H<
endstream
endobj
36 0 obj
<>stream
H| Xǫz`<]