%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-06-24T15:17:01-04:00
2021-06-24T15:17-04:00
2021-06-24T15:17:01-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
03-09805.h1
uuid:0c4631cd-db1b-4122-8527-11909aa2b7d9
uuid:bc34848f-0870-4777-aaf9-b50c986b3d1d
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
19 0 obj
<>
endobj
21 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
23 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
20 0 obj
<><><><><><>]/P 18 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
25 0 obj
[32 0 R]
endobj
26 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(03-09805.h1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(Computer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archiv\
ed%20-%20HTML/03-09805.h1.html)Tj
49.796 0 Td
([6/24/2021 3:17:01 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 624.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 623.9997 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 623.25 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 623.9997 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.751 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: )Tj
(May 25, 2005)Tj
0 -2.75 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(--------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 03-09805)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
14.419 -2.125 Td
(DECISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE)Tj
2.793 -2.125 Td
(KATHRYN MOEN BRAEMAN)Tj
3.222 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 523.5 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 499.5 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-4.359 -2.2 Td
(Francisco J. Mendez, Jr., Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
5.137 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.2 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 276.5312 399.75 Tm
(SYNOPSIS)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 276.5312 399 cm
0 0 m
58.688 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 374.25 Tm
(Security concerns remain over Applicant's criminal conduct in 1998 and 2\
001 and over his personal conduct in failing to)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(disclose his 1998 arrest for Simple )Tj
14.109 0 Td
(Battery on his 2000 security clearance application. )Tj
20.493 0 Td
(While he completed anger)Tj
-34.602 -1.125 Td
(management in 2001, that alone is insufficient to establish clear eviden\
ce of )Tj
30.629 0 Td
(successful rehabilitation. )Tj
10.191 0 Td
(Clearance is)Tj
-40.82 -1.125 Td
(denied.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.558 -2.125 Td
(STATEMENT OF THE CASE)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-17.558 -2.125 Td
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals \(DOHA\) issued a Statement o\
f Reasons \(SOR\) to the Applicant on)Tj
T*
(October 21, 2004. )Tj
(The SOR detailed reasons )Tj
18.135 0 Td
(why the Government could not make the preliminary positive finding that)Tj
-18.135 -1.375 Td
(it is clearly consistent with the national interest to grant or continue\
a security )Tj
31.325 0 Td
(clearance for the Applicant.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 525.1562 257.25 Tm
( \(1\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
q 1 0 0 1 525.1562 256.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 538.9624 252.75 Tm
( )Tj
(The SOR)Tj
-43.58 -1.125 Td
(alleges specific concerns over criminal conduct \(Guideline J\) in parag\
raph 1 and over personal conduct \(Guideline E\) in)Tj
T*
(paragraph 2. Applicant responded to these SOR allegations in an Answer n\
otarized on December 5, 2004, and requested)Tj
T*
(a decision without a hearing.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(On March 14, 2004, Department Counsel prepared a File of Relevant Materi\
al \(FORM\) which was forwarded to)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Applicant on March 16, 2004, where he was )Tj
17.995 0 Td
(advised he had an opportunity to review the form, but needed to respond)Tj
-17.995 -1.125 Td
(within 30 days of receipt of the letter. )Tj
15.301 0 Td
(Department Counsel made a Motion to Amend )Tj
19.024 0 Td
(the SOR to conform to the)Tj
-34.325 -1.125 Td
(evidence by substituting "transmitted by you on July 15, 2000" for "exec\
uted by you on June 2, 2000" in allegation 2.a.)Tj
T*
(concerning )Tj
4.692 0 Td
(his security clearance application. )Tj
13.799 0 Td
(As Applicant submitted no objection, this motion to amend the SOR is)Tj
-18.492 -1.125 Td
(granted.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant received the FORM on March 21, 2005; so his response was due o\
n April 20, 2005. He submitted no)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(response. On May 18, 2005, the matter was )Tj
17.635 0 Td
(assigned to me.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
1.771 -2.125 Td
(FINDINGS OF FACT)Tj
ET
0 G
q 1 0 0 1 248.8721 54 cm
0 0 m
114.006 0 l
h
S
Q
EMC
endstream
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
28 0 obj
(mk{.l)
endobj
29 0 obj
<>
endobj
30 0 obj
<>
endobj
31 0 obj
<>
endobj
37 0 obj
<>
endobj
38 0 obj
<>stream
H\Mn0>,EdBBDb RKXYpmJz}n :0=+Ʋ} ڨ[1Nn&&j/yS[Fo6_n9# 4
hC/ҽ'ۮ7aّʴ0j8;K{E&
Z
[z&x(0qxHL*UԫWI?d>Y^WȗL<Đk
Y44txscw\a U
endstream
endobj
39 0 obj
<>stream
H|Tv*ƺ|%.
ŧ)VKlIĆ`[F{&Uby5{3wn;߹3P
cvg+n)Q1 щslP:f[ךe<9=>gB0R*`jг߈]B=m+.:y_M_^rt2r.!Wyo@L4N|)}6=<\G5 qI:ڊ&h?qP\⩆@J&Th|>jQ;r╲*Mjaq[a'Kt;l/ԾN[.?xڱ6hW^_#,I3E)&7Y&f)QTi_2eBJT6#0~jk|V:uoаQ&M5iV۴mݰ:߱_>ϺGFEGLl\|^@A|>t#Q|q'LL2yig̜9sǂ.J[d˖;W\ū]~79cm3ޑs={?p#GN9{.ܗr/C("!j P)ݔ5֞b֞P&CwTsp9qJ_݀%
?ߨhT5F#g1IdcXml4Fq8n\0n
n7x@ѵ*j;'::3m
(,,3i
8G8a*/~"JMV'SjoϚm-@zEݦ8Dc>~I?obKIGS_s(#9Tr-`9iI%f9jVEgÙ\| o9Drhmm_`+PxUDy;J2$
zc9.3IS))"