>-4m nHf1 E}\U,x&k
,'MNyٚG3 K4Qb7SN⪦ d7@{ڨf0F$L
Hh,$< Ad=C Bh֥?~N]-|~͗60 1\DyVJL.j.!b DQ3WXSeڛ4/%Aɼ3.zEdyUlaT]/I|V$6n7&9ۥ]C!t?-.xZz$\ _
w{½=X(:$YE^Dp-/ R(snzt<4&1L 0 OhvZqK *ã8Qj%(Wqu?9;Rn@u?[ZG ƙ+ց #PmB jz87/OI|8'#= D8cEq/ehkS
)iQO4
U5?lcZ8xq@} ~\
/*Z%dF,eUcC n!w%}h|X!]Rz0V-e8r;m*-+]c`pP,v ߔ;*WRբh
HZq p,=x
^~*SD l{,b-yOyY7OV.+?dWl wgߝ 8;wgs QFOc4FhRڮK:ЪD(X+VM6It&NLXѩ,f
S%wIWA=9Sy#pfdQ7_N M~hrR@(=ʌXGn0ǥ'9~^= ͩ o'?OnE"⪙K*JIdgM&ЋE[ be3dzd[S}5^WwD].DȠPg;a][^IS\0|hwz( YK%-˶҃YۍW-Ѓu [tS;Q xb0zpu
Dmۋ=6O9 Sb̓`4
q*ߥAqa)$,JBț)=2Q0*L uLZʘ`͙MMBXvƨ;K%u\9:wo Ȑ
A,ږse[݆
k6,!x b4{ƋfۿZCRs-ӹY8scf_YsNjS&F[LzG ڎ{v
]zoz7$?}vPVǘY-|go9[F:խ+L4 H.69t+ݯǽgx[xC_
9 1qYfc')b%QufQ aP:1N
H3榝?s:/}6F!: x<'\BzcA*A:Hܨ%k mXjupuaxF?ܴ/p%XN9!k;vܹk O0XD"4$=]0>'LeYƈ?VE}^21ܨI0,e7~Nyq|Π߾6|
g~ظrtz7ws#z~CU*@ҫρK%mkZ puEb=^_Tf8?:~YuU$
:ErU1 RtI@#^,ok U +%TTQP+D!+
CXbv
z̸G|$ nR;2~X eIOaW_;u-;: l"O'MDTd " 'g c_xPA9 DtT@_ynٿMD?>-3XV;Ըp+ߊHD!6
k\;
hW*>IZ|Z
U
7Oڦ)nْ'4E2*_?( ws8>4$&څvN_ɷH$j tv9
bx0\L ¨pÛ 3))5NR _M]K}ZI, chhH%5
+1-R7d,7 wX cmwѤJV*N 3$Ng7=O>Lg/FՒGr +
o}~|؏_G5V]`Xj
I"Z96WvP$ci7 KĈ1SfE7tbS^M1x*0 MQ-!ima8-Mr6) nx
0R?x0fY~NY ; ';:R9Z};I|wfszmn G?% rKd~8F$GTQH":8 Ć:؉r# pg82aC$wcL0=E5 N$%5#Lc$eQh[c q4u>E1o62nD?HFֿF8 Ӗf%2)a"IT$
aL.
& ::q#?8 8!\yC! .b=e
p`/9 `$O[C_^~{
*wmBOp)9BFզ jSČe鬉5[3 o1Z(Z)5
BEdB!#\Q%PŎD M[7)
B j`Ї? RQk?7k78 'Y.-ղ>Poa9=݇}F2S=']rq>w /|O/8Vg u
p|tqܢk4R ijA~7HU2,`xKREIb(ʘBlM*o*256>nmvX hߎ"
ڃ` %%xo
nR/4QEQEx
|6GwQs Y
KC;v[dRb&,:Cb{#n~iDZH:C$}Āl%I dg4tac* #H|ϒ HGQV7M0 :&fDGK/##[_W
)
>rra+1p&9:GQv7"Vx $
u^i`!ԦgYQ59hBOr:1UPݮ
a)' U,sgK-<{,2)tBP5ҁ5sU;U=S+ߧnK3Dk2 #N%l,x\tzad#Z#t}ѝ6D[HtʚPx89do,""pZ|V^zS}bw8IFmN%hFˈ{IEc; 9Il*2tĀӆLDs4uP,b$2v1 a tѨWDL$ K=F6 gjv;Uw c#9Nm~=E6 tH|C; vl H{n}qh'{שz/|w+'2Wɿ`dkI5wpi/y ]r `#nx9`4{5k/QX{IUk|cjcX"FK۴w'XnfwBUnco6A牋R84`U`?A Yb|XG커ǻBJx3+xיfYF(pl@-&=lMQI`dd;L֡4Y%vJ WA> Zg`K9fg!e
ȧ,$!--TuYKk@ v;-)`ʾjK>ȁĸFrzFV1Q~F
Bf6 gD/ wY 3O[EI`\ZlsBWas#Ǘ7@p`֓[Y;qZ\$Ŗt\CEkV$,B>h\| XĬ/=dIv ]dIKn0 iw|%KfwO돍n
v)$`iQ sBSO}r,\s/H;pHYQBdFbxqԀfX:, [ڻ
@;o!*g>ڻ*:UEǫ*7}uc'B![W(:bY]Sr]W̕|vmuǀ; # \ 4 IM9nZhE(`nŤLŤ& g`>-؊{ |j
.h?Q6+\9xyw
@ r}0R$`c9h]`ހe9'+Vj/YtR) "7 OHQ
_zG\wEѵbswPB|Q aa&3WWX\-\re<ɐW|̾uΕ=V_s}XϬ{-k[{\s }
ˈ@F $M2I(8A*5VH~"'(\5$qBk;2h(Yd&dY&{EcMɻJ5aE-Q/C&i44hstAL'Qjw M2Xd0ZrՎU+3nO 1R1iqX-e-˛Z_ ת NI6d5rN ; a-k9XkdZε2ujxjNeL{ޕp\c~$cjP+a)w($߽<ڧ >Olߴ> 9ta |ue3lf6- kPZ#ƺjWfXUjlu+E-cy5a,t6=*|l<510 s
P@RvUGQ~W :aVx0 xp">BS"3h51ϧ<_|6jw,\ZږKL:Iq& τ߄?xFXL&4!l q[؞ROڐ%SI%07 (RfrJҌ9+-N[i|| 6)s-
Xq_ b L-ߴx:~|ax#֧W"?(dL)[uJ 7 B<֠_0-}4ާ:P읾 :}} tB ,? :
endstream
endobj
17 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 4/Type/Page>>
endobj
42 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(05-05533.h1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/05-05533.h1.html)Tj
50.296 0 Td
([7/2/2021 3:47:54 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 417 591.75 348.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
BT
/Article <>BDC
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 751.5 Tm
(3. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
(Id)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(. at 2-4; Item 6 \(Applicant's undated answers to interrogatories\) at 5\
.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(4. )Tj
(Item 6, )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
4.083 0 Td
(supra)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( note 3, at 5.)Tj
-4.083 -2.125 Td
(5. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
(Id)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(. at 14-44; Item 7 \(Credit Report, dated August 31, 2005\) at 1-2; Item\
8 \(Credit report, dated April 28, 2006\) at 1-2.)Tj
T*
(6. )Tj
(Directive, Enclosure 2, \266 E2.2.1.1. through E2.2.1.9.)Tj
T*
(7. )Tj
(ISCR Case No. 96-0277 at 2 \(App. Bd., July 11, 1997\).)Tj
T*
(8. )Tj
(ISCR Case No. 97-0016 at 3 \(App. Bd., December 31, 1997\); Directive, E\
nclosure 3, \266 E3.1.14.)Tj
T*
(9. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
(Department of the Navy v. Egan)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
13.886 0 Td
(, 484 U.S. 518, 528 \(1988\).)Tj
-13.886 -2.125 Td
(10. )Tj
(ISCR Case No. 94-1075 at 3-4 \(App. Bd., August 10, 1995\); Directive, E\
nclosure 3, \266 E3.1.15.)Tj
T*
(11. )Tj
(ISCR Case No. 93-1390 at 7-8 \(App. Bd. Decision and Reversal Order, Jan\
uary 27, 1995\); Directive, Enclosure 3, \266)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(E3.1.15.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(12. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
(Egan)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(, 484 U.S. at 531.)Tj
T*
(13. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
(Id)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(.)Tj
T*
(14. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
(Id)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(.; Directive, Enclosure 2, \266 E2.2.2.)Tj
T*
(15. )Tj
(Executive Order No. 10865 \247 7.)Tj
EMC
ET
endstream
endobj
16 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 3/Type/Page>>
endobj
43 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(05-05533.h1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/05-05533.h1.html)Tj
50.296 0 Td
([7/2/2021 3:47:54 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 755.25 Tm
(The issue before me is whether Applicant has presented sufficient eviden\
ce of extenuation, mitigation or changed)Tj
ET
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 741.75 Tm
(circumstances to warrant a favorable security clearance decision. Her in\
ability to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
32.597 0 Td
(pay her delinquent debts and her)Tj
-32.597 -1.125 Td
(acknowledged monthly financial deficit raises security concerns. She has\
not demonstrated a willingness to accept)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(responsibility for her overdue debts, which raises)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
19.939 0 Td
(questions about her trustworthiness to hold a security clearance. Given)Tj
-19.939 -1.125 Td
(that my decision turns on more than applying disqualifying and mitigatin\
g factors, I find that Applicant's unwillingness)Tj
T*
(to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(resolve her delinquent debt weighs against granting her a security clear\
ance. She has not mitigated the government's)Tj
T*
(concerns under Guideline F. Accordingly, for the reasons stated, I find \
that it is)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
31.964 0 Td
(not clearly consistent with the national)Tj
-31.964 -1.125 Td
(interest to grant a security clearance to Applicant.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
19.364 -2.125 Td
(FORMAL FINDINGS)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 248.374 634.5 cm
0 0 m
115.002 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 609.75 Tm
(Formal findings For or Against Applicant on the allegations set forth in\
the SOR, as required by Section E3.1.25 of)Tj
T*
(Enclosure 3 of the Directive, are:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Paragraph 1, Guideline F : )Tj
10.831 0 Td
(AGAINST APPLICANT)Tj
-10.831 -2.125 Td
(Subparagraph 1.a: )Tj
7.525 0 Td
(For Applicant)Tj
-7.525 -2.125 Td
(Subparagraph 1.b: )Tj
7.582 0 Td
(Against Applicant)Tj
-7.582 -2.125 Td
(Subparagraph 1.c: )Tj
7.525 0 Td
(Against Applicant)Tj
-7.525 -2.125 Td
(Subparagraph 1.d: )Tj
7.582 0 Td
(Against Applicant)Tj
-7.582 -2.125 Td
(Subparagraph 1.e: )Tj
7.525 0 Td
(Against Applicant)Tj
-7.525 -2.125 Td
(Subparagraph 1.f: )Tj
(Against Applicant)Tj
T*
(Subparagraph 1.g: )Tj
7.582 0 Td
(Against Applicant)Tj
-7.582 -2.125 Td
(Subparagraph 1.h: )Tj
7.582 0 Td
(Against Applicant)Tj
-7.582 -2.125 Td
(Subparagraph 1.i: )Tj
7.359 0 Td
(Against Applicant)Tj
-7.359 -2.125 Td
(Subparagraph 1.j: )Tj
7.359 0 Td
(Against Applicant)Tj
-7.359 -2.125 Td
(Subparagraph 1.k: )Tj
7.582 0 Td
(Against Applicant)Tj
-7.582 -2.125 Td
(Subparagraph 1.l: )Tj
7.359 0 Td
(Against Applicant)Tj
-7.359 -2.125 Td
(Subparagraph 1.m: )Tj
7.859 0 Td
(For Applicant)Tj
-7.859 -2.125 Td
(Subparagraph 1.n: )Tj
7.582 0 Td
(Against Applicant)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
14.102 -2.125 Td
(DECISION)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 276.2002 187.5 cm
0 0 m
59.35 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 162.75 Tm
(In light of all of the circumstances presented by the record in this cas\
e, it is not clearly consistent with the national)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(interest to grant a security clearance for Applicant. Clearance is denie\
d.)Tj
21.143 -2.125 Td
(Mary E. Henry)Tj
-1.278 -2.125 Td
(Administrative Judge)Tj
-19.865 -2.125 Td
(1. )Tj
(Item 3 \(Applicant's response to the SOR, undated\) at 1-2.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(2. )Tj
(Item 4 \(Applicant's security clearance application, dated April 9, 2004\
\) at 1-2.)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
15 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 2/Type/Page>>
endobj
44 0 obj
[46 0 R 47 0 R 48 0 R]
endobj
45 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(05-05533.h1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/05-05533.h1.html)Tj
50.296 0 Td
([7/2/2021 3:47:54 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 752.25 Tm
(determinations should err, if they must, on the side of denials.")Tj
ET
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 317.8398 756.75 Tm
( \(13\))Tj
ET
Q
0 0 0.933 RG
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 317.8398 756 cm
0 0 m
18.681 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 336.521 752.25 Tm
( Any reasonable)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(doubt about whether an applicant)Tj
-26.71 -1.375 Td
(should be allowed access to sensitive information must be resolved in fa\
vor of protecting such sensitive information.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 576.2031 740.25 Tm
( \(14\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 576.2031 739.5 cm
0 0 m
18.681 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 722.25 Tm
(Section 7 of Executive Order 10865)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.663 0 Td
(specifically provides industrial security clearance decisions shall be "\
in terms of the)Tj
-14.663 -1.125 Td
(national interest and shall in no sense be a determination as to the loy\
alty of the applicant concerned." The)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
42.783 0 Td
(decision to)Tj
-42.783 -1.125 Td
(deny an individual a security clearance is not necessarily a determinati\
on as to the allegiance, loyalty, and patriotism of)Tj
0 -1.375 TD
(an applicant.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 77.3066 683.25 Tm
( \(15\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 77.3066 682.5 cm
0 0 m
18.681 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 95.9878 678.75 Tm
( It is merely an indication that the applicant has not)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
20.744 0 Td
(met the strict guidelines the President and the)Tj
-27.41 -1.125 Td
(Secretary of Defense have established for issuing a clearance.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Based upon a consideration of the evidence as a whole, I find the follow\
ing adjudicative guideline most pertinent to an)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(evaluation of the facts of this case:)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
0 -2.125 TD
(Financial Considerations - Guideline F: An individual who is financially\
overextended is at risk of having to)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(engage in illegal acts to generate funds. Unexplained affluence is often\
linked)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
32.916 0 Td
(to proceeds from financially)Tj
-32.916 -1.125 Td
(profitable criminal acts.)Tj
20.489 -2.125 Td
(CONCLUSIONS)Tj
ET
0 G
q 1 0 0 1 261.8652 547.5 cm
0 0 m
88.02 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 522.75 Tm
(Upon consideration of all the facts in evidence, and after application o\
f all appropriate adjudicative factors, I conclude)Tj
T*
(the following with respect to the allegations set forth in the SOR:)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
0 -2.125 TD
(Financial Considerations)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
T*
(The government has established its case under Guideline F as to allegati\
ons b through l and n. Applicant has a history of)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(excessive, unpaid debt. She had much of her excessive indebtedness)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
27.547 0 Td
(discharged by the bankruptcy court in 2001. Since)Tj
-27.547 -1.125 Td
(then, she has incurred over $3,000 in new delinquent debts, which are pr\
imarily medical bills. Applicant's financial)Tj
T*
(problems clearly fall within)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
11.33 0 Td
(the Financial Considerations Disqualifying Conditions E2.A6.1.2.1 \()Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
27.498 0 Td
(A history of not)Tj
-38.828 -1.125 Td
(meeting financial obligations)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
11.721 0 Td
(\) and E2.A6.1.2.3 \()Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
(Inability or unwillingness to satisfy debts)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
24.165 0 Td
(\). Allegation m is a)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
7.943 0 Td
(factor)Tj
-43.829 -1.125 Td
(which I must consider in making my decision, but is not a factor which i\
nvokes a disqualifying condition. Allegation a)Tj
T*
(is found in favor of applicant.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(A security concern based on financial problems can be mitigated in sever\
al ways. Applicant's debt problems have been)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(ongoing for a number of years, and are not recent. Thus, she has not)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
27.464 0 Td
(established a mitigating condition under Financial)Tj
-27.464 -1.125 Td
(Considerations Mitigating Conditions \(FC MC\) E2.A6.1.3.1 \()Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
24.723 0 Td
(The behavior was not recent)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
11.387 0 Td
(\).)Tj
-36.11 -2.125 Td
(Applicant acknowledges owing eleven different debts and her 2001 bankrup\
tcy, so her indebted is not an isolated)Tj
T*
(incident. Thus, FC MC E2.A6.1.3.2 \()Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
14.916 0 Td
(It was an isolated incident)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
10.555 0 Td
(\) does not apply.)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
6.916 0 Td
(Her statement that she could not pay)Tj
-32.387 -1.125 Td
(these bills because of unidentified expenses with her children does not \
identify factors which may have been beyond her)Tj
T*
(control, and thus, is not sufficient for)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.081 0 Td
(E2.A6.1.3.3 \()Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
(The conditions that resulted in the behavior were largely beyond the)Tj
-15.081 -1.125 Td
(person's control)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(\) to apply.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(She has not provided any evidence that she has received counseling for h\
er financial problems, hence, FC MC)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(E2.A6.1.3.4 \()Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
(The person has received or is receiving counseling for the problem and)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
34.244 0 Td
(there are clear indications that the)Tj
-34.244 -1.125 Td
(problem is being resolved or is under control)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
18.137 0 Td
(\) is not applicable. Likewise, she has not provided any documentation)Tj
-18.137 -1.125 Td
(showing a good faith effort to pay her bills, so)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
18.747 0 Td
(FC MC E2.A6.1.3.6 \()Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
(The individual initiated a good faith effort to repay)Tj
-18.747 -1.125 Td
(overdue creditors or otherwise resolve debts)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
17.858 0 Td
(\) does not apply.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
-17.858 -2.125 Td
(Whole Person Analysis)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
0 -2.125 TD
(Protection of our national security is of paramount concern. Security cl\
earance decisions are not intended to assign guilt)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(or to impose further punishment for past transgressions. Rather, the obj\
ective)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
31.132 0 Td
(of the adjudicative process is the fair-)Tj
-31.132 -1.125 Td
(minded, common sense assessment of a person's trustworthiness and fitnes\
s for access to classified information. Thus, in)Tj
T*
(reaching this decision, I have)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
11.94 0 Td
(considered the whole person concept in evaluating Appellant's risk and v\
ulnerability in)Tj
-11.94 -1.125 Td
(protecting our national interests.)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
46 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<