k2z
lѵ{|ZSo4ί@ #sQCϏ , >ɝ
L2) L{[T=xn ϟ<~7b5p\DE {g0~pi0;EKX{E \&0yP90`#%p}
p~N{ ̗{`o A?TB'{(PϺbAl >0З P(ЃD&,Nv,NJUUE}(é⌮?+9u
CcW_C '}㫣TTUBsgzN:c{PMË}HXX#}
G$G+u_ֻt܉BJh8/$o$4EnnIkj8bbg<"ҠFJ"5SNӛH|^Ri'b\xM( 6%UUeM#<ǯY^s̢lG)R$} /}և bS {_6QosHj\TT1VV z,VP`Lm˱eTN ђzC:8+'ݺe:`EwDv5wxŦ , 9:x.9H;_U֯MՅxvɒ
\x6w`/g,zxQxH$Nl=t5G&}*{ Q tZ+=0_# ~sX ]":Vq&3~{}َwss'NKH4BQ%M4_%a,@ "k-
1
B*T֪]5USA]J-6Һ=ف}ӽ~ OpOdw*V ne]=_lKJ,!C ۺND; OxTGW{
j0 r z+*/f3hfzjJs'h*(bKo 34rk=lP
QCc&ȣt*z *"Q!D Gwݮq|/I-{O Vȵu}15u+w^_G=Sk,o䟁 ^%@ k|#5ڱTug-,xN YY&KnEn4E"[SKQ K:ݙnTR1B!HP\ 뽔_i"()[Gj2 *
$)^LJD2JfbP kk(E5 CWIh TJ&2KRns,-W2*
A8h~ DjZ;x{+Wu[k{~d_|k5M;FZ@qpi_ 9~1Y?CeQf
;u/qGf/}o r3b!۟N[9pwv n?:8l+RHQҒ t*11YJ**b('DAb:P}uePl ˳},a?{exҙ
U F1ll2vx^@EYwE] +ʏp54FZHp$~9V9%̕旴`-[16/<ЬG`ɐ%]5h `3ltٻze5hm_mi+;k,tiS Z m/Y DZMUx芛MTy {MXع488 n9ݡ; ϱpg2,-sӖin:qn$YE Hpua]By
Cv [VR\Qm,cg ! PŻnnx*
^U%Utu Wj 9QZ CjC,h >{yzsLDj+i2V zpha 23gBfÕMTU q!e[WMl[U(yٽ#<`]&n@eцBqZs'E_^NԲW9 .#+;)f2>OjOz!'e}E?z%{qSdC)GC)4#TRug(`(X դ)vTn";&ouEch9`4K) c^즡^a8\ n"
r P~-f5j(wLDrKxIْ߁ܒGAcU==o a>0Bc> nX lT*;q5*>U?Ww_oA`y? HV;W/Opihܷ8Һ}P:-ؖ&s$@>e.Qv)@Rl*x !RgwseB'C4Q)ɤ K)Ei!?༖÷D[ηН\VXrX=HXr#ؓWHWHF瓴
*
TST%VEv@fSd(-TSĝ
|{tw'T7.twmyE{(_@me\6족5߄ћ˛φQ LM!o"* p<\(M2 \HUX\4/ zi^@WpNQ%/_ Qj_&F d +JX%HY(׃1H4#Q;r+p52 *1hZ
D,Phì1_[\+M
{F߃I 7oB(Xo)MаΝp Ŵ;Z}gbʋ0;@bb$YVoj\m0>hM+xDztﶷ-g-ax,7gŲ\
x¾m|lL?BݿvQ UU9?ǽ[ۡ v6$vK:$
dXڭ t.PZĢ@c Q Uhk+h`Ȳ}y]=4W8GQچq4^/q=5&[(YAyn1S½ܧ;JO9K%KL6xc% #Jw w[1h)55E8+Y3I_!&nyN\>S@,j#GqmV4/D"F8 (\"; h+tRL?M%uٞѫ)a<7 <U)3e7j LoMf7||[Tݜir uYCaϦf
ROTOtWw{n
VnrWO>#5Ň4O&:}@
J fe ·UYn
7N 8JUhF{ eL \n 7 c 5 r 6 *z^ \.YmX,97Kstu Ac 5l FYZ/ө;ϷmoѳdϷ_Ѿ
;V:Bc گ<_V]_ԺӉ3ٟZ {< }eJv
߲Mk[t<]ݮ-_sݞykZ s~GTgyG)n$y{ʿQ. NL[}߆$;\Is"RSi{ڐQ̽.i+uQ-m(۷CHxcALrV$ߣ92YJsdn ݺ0c:v|O ?wݑ_gջD=ɍ| y&V,wûֶ![ko"&HAR7G_x[1r QDz-<ؗ* 4jl)>Bx^[d6yoK-6SWnbB3| -^mVufx$ o x㱢Z+lOD9ߚl+% tZo" j9~>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[468.0 201.0 482.0 212.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 5/Type/Page>>
endobj
46 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(04-08788.h1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/04-08788.h1.html)Tj
50.296 0 Td
([7/2/2021 3:34:31 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 515.25 591.75 250.5 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 19.4424 755.25 Tm
(E2.A10.1.3. 4. )Tj
(The person did not voluntarily commit the act and/or the factors leading\
to the violation are not likely to)Tj
ET
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 68.7842 741.75 Tm
(recur; E2.A10.1.3. 5. Acquittal; E2.A10.1.3. 6. There is clear evidence \
of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
29.574 0 Td
(successful rehabilitation.)Tj
-29.762 -2.125 Td
(4. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
(E2.A6.1.2. )Tj
(Conditions that could raise a security concern and may be disqualifying \
include:)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-4.089 -2.125 Td
(E2.A6.1.2.1. )Tj
(A history of not meeting financial obligations; )Tj
24.135 0 Td
(E2.A6.1.2.2. )Tj
(Deceptive or illegal financial practices such as)Tj
-22.007 -1.125 Td
(embezzlement, employee theft, check fraud, income tax evasion, expense)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
29.626 0 Td
(account fraud, filing deceptive loan)Tj
-30.853 -1.125 Td
(statements, and other intentional financial breaches of trust; )Tj
24.131 0 Td
(E2.A6.1.2.3. )Tj
(Inability or unwillingness to satisfy debts;)Tj
-23.047 -1.125 Td
(E2.A6.1.2.4. )Tj
(Unexplained affluence; )Tj
14.939 0 Td
(E2.A6.1.2.5. )Tj
(Financial problems that are linked to gambling, drug abuse,)Tj
-2.303 -1.125 Td
(alcoholism, or other issues of security concern.)Tj
-14.167 -2.125 Td
(5. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
(E2.A6.1.3. Conditions that could mitigate security concerns include:)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( )Tj
(E2.A6.1.3.1. )Tj
(The behavior was not recent;)Tj
-0.136 -1.125 Td
(E2.A6.1.3.2. )Tj
(It was an isolated incident; )Tj
16.302 0 Td
(E2.A6.1.3.3. )Tj
(The conditions that)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
13.304 0 Td
(resulted in the behavior were largely beyond)Tj
-29.848 -1.125 Td
(the person's control \(e.g., loss of employment, a business downturn, un\
expected medical emergency, or a death, divorce)Tj
1.106 -1.125 Td
(or separation\); )Tj
6.053 0 Td
(E2.A6.1.3.4. )Tj
(The person has received or is receiving counseling for the problem and t\
here are clear)Tj
-6.305 -1.125 Td
(indications that the problem is being resolved or is under control; E2.A\
6.1.23.5. )Tj
32.188 0 Td
(The affluence resulted from a)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
12.077 0 Td
(legal)Tj
-44.515 -1.125 Td
(source; and )Tj
4.832 0 Td
(E2.A6.1.23.6. )Tj
(The individual initiated a good-faith effort to repay overdue creditors \
or otherwise resolve)Tj
17.342 -1.125 Td
(debts.)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
17 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 4/Type/Page>>
endobj
47 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(04-08788.h1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/04-08788.h1.html)Tj
50.296 0 Td
([7/2/2021 3:34:31 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 755.25 Tm
(rule for her on subparagraphs )Tj
12.023 0 Td
(2.c., 2.e., 2.g.)Tj
ET
Q
BT
0 g
/TT1 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 248.374 729.75 Tm
(FORMAL FINDINGS)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 248.374 729 cm
0 0 m
115.002 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 704.25 Tm
(After reviewing the allegations of the SOR in the context of the Adjudic\
ative Guidelines in Enclosure 2 and the factors)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(set forth under the Adjudicative Process section, I make the following f\
ormal)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
31.13 0 Td
(findings:)Tj
-31.13 -2.125 Td
(Paragraph 1. Guideline J: )Tj
10.414 0 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
-10.414 -2.125 Td
(Subparagraph 1.a.: )Tj
7.775 0 Td
(For Applicant)Tj
-7.775 -2.125 Td
(Subparagraph 1.b.: )Tj
7.832 0 Td
(For Applicant)Tj
-7.832 -2.125 Td
(Subparagraph 1.c.: )Tj
7.775 0 Td
(For Applicant)Tj
-7.775 -2.125 Td
(Paragraph 2. Guideline F: )Tj
10.581 0 Td
(AGAINST APPLICANT)Tj
-10.581 -2.125 Td
(Subparagraph 2.a.: )Tj
7.775 0 Td
(Against Applicant)Tj
-7.775 -2.125 Td
(Subparagraph 2.b.: )Tj
7.832 0 Td
(Against Applicant)Tj
-7.832 -2.125 Td
(Subparagraph 2.c.: )Tj
7.775 0 Td
(For Applicant)Tj
-7.775 -2.125 Td
(Subparagraph 2.d.: )Tj
7.832 0 Td
(Against Applicant)Tj
-7.832 -2.125 Td
(Subparagraph 2.e.: )Tj
7.775 0 Td
(For Applicant)Tj
-7.775 -2.125 Td
(Subparagraph 2.f.: )Tj
(Against Applicant)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Subparagraph 2.g.: )Tj
7.832 0 Td
(For Applicant)Tj
-7.832 -2.125 Td
(Subparagraph 2.h.: )Tj
7.832 0 Td
(Against Applicant)Tj
-7.832 -2.125 Td
(Subparagraph 2.i.: )Tj
7.609 0 Td
(Against Applicant)Tj
-7.609 -2.125 Td
(Subparagraph 2.j.: )Tj
7.609 0 Td
(Against Applicant)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
14.074 -2.125 Td
(DECISION)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 276.2002 282 cm
0 0 m
59.35 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 257.25 Tm
(In light of all the circumstances presented by the record in this case, \
it is not clearly consistent with the national interest)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(to grant or continue a security clearance for the Applicant. )Tj
23.573 0 Td
(Clearance is)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
5.164 0 Td
(denied.)Tj
-9.441 -2.125 Td
(Kathryn Moen Braeman)Tj
0.569 -2.125 Td
(Administrative Judge)Tj
-18.854 -2.125 Td
(1. )Tj
(This procedure is required by Executive Order 10865, as amended, and Dep\
artment of Defense Directive 5220.6,)Tj
7.885 -1.125 Td
(dated January 2, 1992 \(Directive\), as amended by Change 4, April 20, 1\
999.)Tj
-8.667 -2.125 Td
(2. )Tj
(While she provided no diagnosis nor prognosis from him, I note she has h\
ad no additional arrests for shoplifting. )Tj
46.354 0 Td
(She)Tj
-37.174 -1.125 Td
(was hospitalized in June 2006, but she did not explain for what conditio\
n.)Tj
-9 -2.125 Td
(3. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
(E2.A10.1.3. Conditions that could mitigate security concerns include: )Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(E2.A10.1.3. 1. )Tj
(The criminal behavior was)Tj
0.018 -1.125 Td
(not recent; E2.A10.1.3. 2. )Tj
10.581 0 Td
(The crime was an isolated incident;)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.439 0 Td
(E2.A10.1.3.3. )Tj
(The person was pressured or coerced into)Tj
-17.446 -1.125 Td
(committing the act and those pressures are no longer present in that per\
son's life;)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
16 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 3/Type/Page>>
endobj
48 0 obj
[50 0 R 51 0 R 52 0 R]
endobj
49 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(04-08788.h1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/04-08788.h1.html)Tj
50.296 0 Td
([7/2/2021 3:34:31 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 755.25 Tm
(applicant's security clearance may be made only after an affirmative fin\
ding that to do so is clearly consistent with the)Tj
ET
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 741.75 Tm
(national interest. In reaching the fair and impartial overall common)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
27.129 0 Td
(sense determination, the Administrative Judge may)Tj
-27.129 -1.125 Td
(draw only those inferences and conclusions that have a reasonable and lo\
gical basis in the evidence of record.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
20.489 -2.125 Td
(CONCLUSIONS)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.8652 702 cm
0 0 m
88.02 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 259.0381 677.25 Tm
(Criminal Conduct)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.253 -2.125 Td
(Applicant's criminal misconduct raised security concerns over a 1995 Ass\
ault and Battery on police officers where she)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(was found guilty and sentenced to one year probation, later dismissed in\
)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
29.132 0 Td
(1996. )Tj
(After her 2001 arrest for shoplifting,)Tj
-29.132 -1.125 Td
(Applicant had another 2003 misdemeanor arrest for shoplifting at the sam\
e mall where she paid a large fine and was)Tj
T*
(barred from that mall for two years.)Tj
0 -2.375 TD
(Subsequently, she sought medical help for her bipolar disorder and has n\
ot been arrested since 2003)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 495.8711 587.25 Tm
( \(3\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
q 1 0 0 1 495.8711 586.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 509.6772 582.75 Tm
(. )Tj
(Under)Tj
-41.14 -1.125 Td
(mitigation condition 4, I conclude that given her self-reported efforts \
to reform her)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
33.322 0 Td
(conduct and seek medical treatment)Tj
-33.322 -1.125 Td
(for her bipolar disorder that the pressures that led to this misconduct \
are unlikely to recur. )Tj
36.128 0 Td
(Also, under mitigation)Tj
-36.128 -1.125 Td
(condition 6, there is clear evidence of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.271 0 Td
(successful rehabilitation as she has taken significant steps to reform h\
er conduct.)Tj
-15.271 -1.125 Td
(After looking at the whole person and considering the Adjudicative Proce\
ss factors and the Adjudicative)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
42.071 0 Td
(Guidelines, I)Tj
-42.071 -1.125 Td
(rule for Applicant on subparagraph 1.a. through 1.c. under SOR Paragraph\
1.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
18.808 -2.125 Td
(Financial Considerations)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-18.808 -2.375 Td
(The Government established disqualifying conditions)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 273.2852 465.75 Tm
( \(4\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 273.2852 465 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 287.0913 461.25 Tm
( that could raise a security concern because of Applicant's \(1\))Tj
-22.591 -1.125 Td
(history of financial problems and her, \(2\) )Tj
16.717 0 Td
(Deceptive or illegal financial)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
11.883 0 Td
(practices such as embezzlement, employee theft,)Tj
-28.601 -1.125 Td
(check fraud, income tax evasion, expense account fraud, filing deceptive\
loan statements, and other intentional financial)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(breaches of trust; )Tj
7.136 0 Td
(\(3\))Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(inability or unwillingness to satisfy all of her debts. )Tj
22.247 0 Td
(Applicant had nine unresolved debts totaling)Tj
-29.383 -1.125 Td
(approximately$17,000 and two shoplifting arrests in 2001 and 2003, which\
led to a 2003)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
35.772 0 Td
(conviction and fine that also)Tj
-35.772 -1.125 Td
(led to her being barred from a shopping center.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(While admittedly her bipolar disorder was a condition that led her to ov\
erspend, I cannot discount that concern without)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(a favorable medical prognosis that she can now control these impulses th\
at led to her current financial difficulties. The)Tj
T*
(potential for financial issues recurring remains as she provided insuffi\
cient evidence under mitigation condition 3, to)Tj
T*
(show her financial problems )Tj
11.608 0 Td
(were)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(largely beyond her control and that her psychological condition is now c\
ontrolled)Tj
-11.608 -1.125 Td
(through medication.)Tj
0 -2.375 TD
(To her credit Applicant provided proof of payment for several of the lar\
ge debts, but failed to mitigate)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 506.5 290.25 Tm
( \(5\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 506.5 289.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 520.3062 285.75 Tm
( these financial)Tj
-42.026 -1.125 Td
(concerns overall as she provided insufficient evidence of any plan to re\
solve)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
30.822 0 Td
(the remainder of the long-standing debts.)Tj
-30.822 -1.125 Td
(While she re-financed her home and paid off several of the debts, notabl\
y the IRS debt and tax lien and debts to a major)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(creditor, as documented by the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
12.551 0 Td
(HUD settlement sheet, several large debts remain unresolved. Applicant p\
rovided no)Tj
-12.551 -1.125 Td
(explanation as to why these other debts remain outstanding. )Tj
24.161 0 Td
(Nor did she provide a timetable or a plan as to how)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
20.717 0 Td
(to)Tj
-44.878 -1.125 Td
(resolve the remaining debts. )Tj
11.524 0 Td
(In fact, she provided evidence that she has paid only a few of these deb\
ts. Thus, the security)Tj
-11.524 -1.125 Td
(concern remains that an individual who is financially overextended is at\
)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
29.019 0 Td
(risk of having to engage in illegal acts to)Tj
-29.019 -1.125 Td
(generate funds.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Neither has she met mitigation condition 4 as she failed to document tha\
t she has received or is receiving counseling to)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(develop a plan to address all her financial problems. )Tj
21.104 0 Td
(Notably, she said her)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
8.692 0 Td
(husband would provide financial help, but she)Tj
-29.796 -1.125 Td
(provided no timetable or plan. )Tj
12.33 0 Td
(Looking at her as a whole person, Applicant stated she had long-term emp\
loyment with)Tj
-12.33 -1.125 Td
(the defense contractor; but she )Tj
12.467 0 Td
(failed to provide any evidence, such as work references or evaluations, \
to establish how)Tj
-12.467 -1.125 Td
(she is viewed on the job in order to establish her job stability and fut\
ure ability to pay her debts. )Tj
38.575 0 Td
(While she)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
4.276 0 Td
(provided)Tj
-42.852 -1.125 Td
(evidence of an investment account she did not explain how she would use \
that asset or other assets in the future )Tj
44.849 0 Td
(to)Tj
-44.849 -1.125 Td
(resolve these remaining debts.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(After considering the Adjudicative Process factors and the Adjudicative \
Guidelines, I rule against Applicant under SOR)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Paragraph 2 as she failed to mitigate the allegations in SOR subparagrap\
hs)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
30.104 0 Td
(2.a., 2.b., 2.d., 2.f., 2.h., 2.i. and 2.j. ; )Tj
15.054 0 Td
(but I)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
50 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[495.0 585.0 509.0 596.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
51 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[273.0 463.0 287.0 474.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
52 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[507.0 288.0 521.0 299.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
15 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 2/Type/Page>>
endobj
53 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(04-08788.h1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/04-08788.h1.html)Tj
50.296 0 Td
([7/2/2021 3:34:31 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 755.25 Tm
(statement shows a payment of $5,262.99 for the Federal Tax Lien. \(Answe\
r; Item 11; Exhibit A\))Tj
ET
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 729.75 Tm
(SOR 2.d. )Tj
(Applicant admitted a debt to Creditor #4 for $2,576 for a debt placed fo\
r collection in June 2003. )Tj
42.99 0 Td
(\(Answer,)Tj
-42.99 -1.125 Td
(Item 11\))Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(SOR 2.e. )Tj
(Applicant admitted a debt to Creditor #5 for $1,223 for an account charg\
ed off as a bad debt prior to June)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(2004. She resolved this debt by payment of $1,554 in February 2005. )Tj
27.968 0 Td
(\(Answer;)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Item 11, Exhibit A\))Tj
-27.968 -2.125 Td
(SOR 2.f. )Tj
(Applicant admitted a debt to Creditor #6, for $50 for an account charged\
off as a bad debt prior to June 2004..)Tj
T*
(\(Answer, Item 11\))Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(SOR 2.g. Applicant admitted a debt to Creditor #5, for $1,463 for an acc\
ount charged off as a bad debt prior to 2004.)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(She resolved this debit by payment of $1,011 in February 2005. )Tj
25.746 0 Td
(\(Answer; Item)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(11; Exhibit A\))Tj
-25.746 -2.125 Td
(SOR 2.h. Applicant admitted a debt to Creditor #7 for $2,805 for an acco\
unt charged off as a bad debt prior to June)Tj
T*
(2004. )Tj
(\(Answer; Item 11\))Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(SOR 2.i. Applicant admitted a debt to Creditor #5 for $500 for a debt ch\
arged off as a bad debt prior to June 2004.)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(\(Answer; Item 11\))Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(SOR 2.j. Applicant neither admitted nor denied the information incorpora\
ted from subparagraphs 1.b. and 1.c. \(Answer\))Tj
T*
(Other than her HUD-1 settlement statement, noted above, Applicant failed\
to provide sufficient information on what)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(progress or plan she has made to settle her outstanding accounts with he\
r other)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
31.714 0 Td
(creditors. )Tj
3.999 0 Td
(For example, she failed to say)Tj
-35.712 -1.125 Td
(either what her future plans were for making payment arrangements or for\
seeking discharge of her dated debts in)Tj
T*
(bankruptcy. )Tj
4.999 0 Td
(She did document financial)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
11.219 0 Td
(resources in a $2,318 investment account statement from 2005, but did no\
t)Tj
-16.218 -1.125 Td
(indicate how she planned to use this resource. )Tj
18.578 0 Td
(\(Exhibit A\) While she sought medical help for her bipolar condition, s\
he)Tj
-18.578 -1.125 Td
(provided no evidence that she sought any other assistance or financial c\
ounseling to help her manage her finances more)Tj
T*
(effectively.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
21.767 -2.125 Td
(POLICIES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 277.1992 363 cm
0 0 m
57.352 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 338.25 Tm
(Enclosure 2 of the Directive sets forth adjudicative guidelines to consi\
der in evaluating an individual's security)Tj
T*
(eligibility. )Tj
4.389 0 Td
(They are divided into conditions that could raise a security concern and\
)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
28.824 0 Td
(may be disqualifying and conditions)Tj
-33.212 -1.125 Td
(that could mitigate security concerns in deciding whether to grant or co\
ntinue an individual's access to classified)Tj
T*
(information. )Tj
5.221 0 Td
(But the mere presence or absence)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
13.66 0 Td
(of any given adjudication policy condition is not decisive.)Tj
-18.881 -2.125 Td
(Based on a consideration of the evidence as a whole in evaluating this c\
ase, I weighed relevant Adjudication Guidelines)Tj
T*
(as set forth below:)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.378 -2.125 Td
(Guideline J - Criminal Conduct)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
-17.378 -2.125 Td
(The Concern)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
(: )Tj
(A history or pattern of criminal activity creates doubt about a person's\
judgment, reliability and)Tj
T*
(trustworthiness.)Tj
15.878 -2.125 Td
(Guideline F - Financial Considerations)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
-15.878 -2.125 Td
(The Concern)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
(: )Tj
(An individual who is financially overextended is at risk of having to en\
gage in illegal acts to)Tj
T*
(generate funds. )Tj
(Unexplained affluence is often linked to proceeds from)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
30.304 0 Td
(financially profitable criminal acts.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-30.304 -2.125 Td
(The responsibility for producing evidence initially falls on the Governm\
ent to demonstrate that it is not clearly)Tj
T*
(consistent with the national interest to grant or continue Applicant's a\
ccess to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
31.117 0 Td
(classified information. )Tj
9.248 0 Td
(Then the Applicant)Tj
-40.364 -1.125 Td
(presents evidence to refute, explain, extenuate, or mitigate in order )Tj
26.961 0 Td
(to overcome the doubts raised by the Government,)Tj
-26.961 -1.125 Td
(and to demonstrate persuasively)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
13.107 0 Td
(that it is clearly consistent with the national interest to grant or con\
tinue the clearance.)Tj
-13.107 -1.125 Td
(Under the provisions of Executive Order 10865, as amended, and the Direc\
tive, a decision to grant or)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
40.821 0 Td
(continue an)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
14 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 1/Type/Page>>
endobj
54 0 obj
[56 0 R]
endobj
55 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(04-08788.h1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/04-08788.h1.html)Tj
50.296 0 Td
([7/2/2021 3:34:31 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 755.25 Tm
(make the following findings of fact:)Tj
ET
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 729.75 Tm
(Applicant, 57 years old, has been employed by a defense contractor in St\
ate #1 as an assembler since October 1974. )Tj
46.624 0 Td
(She)Tj
-46.624 -1.125 Td
(completed a Security Clearance Application \(SF 86\) on August 13, 2003.\
)Tj
29.577 0 Td
(\(Item 4; Exhibit A\))Tj
-29.577 -2.125 Td
(Applicant married in 1965 and divorced in 1978; she remarried in 1983 an\
d divorced in 1993. )Tj
37.796 0 Td
(\(Item 4\) )Tj
3.499 0 Td
(Applicant stated)Tj
-41.294 -1.125 Td
(that she is married, but provided no date of the re-marriage. )Tj
24.075 0 Td
(\(Exhibit A\))Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
-6.767 -2.125 Td
(Criminal Conduct and Finances)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-17.308 -2.125 Td
(Applicant revealed in her SF 86 a 1995 arrest for Assault & Battery in S\
tate #1 where she was awarded two years)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(probation; she reported also a pending charge for Shoplifting in January\
2003 in)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
32.298 0 Td
(State #2 where she was awarded)Tj
-32.298 -1.125 Td
(probation. )Tj
4.333 0 Td
(She also admitted a garnishment by the Internal Revenue Service \(IRS\) \
of $7,441.38 that began in April 2002)Tj
-4.333 -1.125 Td
(as well as an IRS tax lien in the same)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.163 0 Td
(amount. )Tj
3.5 0 Td
(She also admitted a 1996 credit card debt that was in collection and a)Tj
-18.663 -1.125 Td
(1996 credit card debt that was 90 days delinquent. )Tj
20.328 0 Td
(Her mortgage was also 90 days delinquent in June 2003. )Tj
22.856 0 Td
(\(Exhibit)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
3.527 0 Td
(4\))Tj
-46.711 -2.125 Td
(Applicant provided an Statement to the Defense Security Service \(DSS\) \
in October 2003 where she stated she paid a)Tj
T*
($300 fine for the 1995 Assault and Battery on three police officers, but\
was)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
30.408 0 Td
(awarded no probation as Appellant had not)Tj
-30.408 -1.125 Td
(been arrested before. )Tj
8.606 0 Td
(She also reported that the outcome on an earlier shoplifting charge was \
not guilty. )Tj
33.019 0 Td
(For the charge)Tj
-41.625 -1.125 Td
(for shoplifting in January 2003)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
12.637 0 Td
(which she had reported on her SF 86 was pending, Applicant was fined $50\
0 for the)Tj
-12.637 -1.125 Td
(misdemeanor. She stated she was given no probation. \(Item 5\) )Tj
25.161 0 Td
(In May 2004 she provided a DSS Statement that)Tj
-25.161 -1.125 Td
(explained that in March 1995 she was arrested for assault and battery on\
three police officers; she was found guilty and)Tj
T*
(sentenced to one year probation. )Tj
13.217 0 Td
(In May 1996 all of the cases were)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
13.773 0 Td
(dismissed. )Tj
(Also, she was arrested in 2001 for)Tj
-26.99 -1.125 Td
(shoplifting and in December 2001, the case was continued without )Tj
26.91 0 Td
(a finding. )Tj
4.083 0 Td
(In March 2003 she was again re-arrested)Tj
-30.993 -1.125 Td
(for shoplifting in the same)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
10.804 0 Td
(mall; and was fined $1,000 with $600 suspended, but she was not allowed \
to enter the mall)Tj
-10.804 -1.125 Td
(for two years. )Tj
(\(Item 10\) )Tj
9.774 0 Td
(Court records confirmed she was awarded one year probation in April 1995\
and)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
32.185 0 Td
(the matter was)Tj
-41.959 -1.125 Td
(dismissed in May 1996. )Tj
(\(Item 7\) )Tj
13.304 0 Td
(Court records showed that the October 2001 charge was resolved without a\
finding)Tj
-13.304 -1.125 Td
(provided she continued medical treatment. )Tj
17.272 0 Td
(Her March 2003)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Class A Misdemeanor was resolved by a plea of guilty)Tj
-17.272 -1.125 Td
(where she was fined $1,000, with $600 suspended; she paid a $480 fine an\
d was barred from the shopping center for)Tj
T*
(two years. )Tj
(\(Items 8, 9,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(13\))Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant stated that she has had no arrests in the past few years. She \
explained that she has bipolar illness and is taking)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(medication for it. )Tj
7.165 0 Td
(While she has had an addiction to shopping in the past,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
22.273 0 Td
(she is getting help and is making progress. She)Tj
-29.438 -1.375 Td
(has been seeing her doctor)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 143.2832 320.25 Tm
( \(2\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 143.2832 319.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 157.0894 315.75 Tm
( for more than five years and continues to see him monthly or twice a mo\
nth as needed.)Tj
-11.757 -1.125 Td
(\(Exhibit A\))Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant in October 2003 had a net monthly remainder of $755 to resolve\
her debts: she had a monthly take-home pay)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(of $4,384, monthly household expenses of $2,924, and household debt)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
28.497 0 Td
(payments of $705. )Tj
7.666 0 Td
(She has assets of)Tj
-36.162 -1.125 Td
(approximately $95,750 include the value of her home and two cars. )Tj
27.242 0 Td
(\(Item 5\))Tj
-27.242 -2.125 Td
(Applicant stated that her husband planned to help her pay her overdue de\
bts when he received )Tj
37.875 0 Td
(money from the death of)Tj
-37.875 -1.125 Td
(his son who was killed in a car crash in May 2005. )Tj
20.524 0 Td
(She planned to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
6.193 0 Td
(straighten out some of her bills and stated that it)Tj
-26.717 -1.125 Td
(would "happen soon," but she provided no timetable or plan. )Tj
24.534 0 Td
(\(Exhibit A\))Tj
-24.534 -2.125 Td
(Applicant and her husband re-financed property in February 2005 and as p\
art of the HUD settlement, her tax lien and)Tj
T*
(other bills were paid as indicated below:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(SOR 2.a. Applicant admitted a debt to Creditor #1 for $542 for an accoun\
t charged off as a bad debt and placed for)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(collection in 2000. )Tj
7.721 0 Td
(\(Answer; Item 11\))Tj
-7.721 -2.125 Td
(SOR 2.b. Applicant admitted a debt to Creditor #2 for $523 for a judgmen\
t entered against her in December 2002.)Tj
T*
(\(Answer; Item 11\))Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(SOR 2.c. Applicant admitted a debt to Creditor #3, the IRS, )Tj
24.135 0 Td
(for $7,441 in taxes, penalties and interest as well as a)Tj
-24.135 -1.125 Td
(Federal Tax Lien filed against her in January 2003; however she stated s\
he had)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
31.878 0 Td
(paid this debt; her HUD-1 Settlement)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
56 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[143.0 318.0 157.0 329.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
12 0 obj
<>
endobj
57 0 obj
<>
endobj
9 0 obj
<>
endobj
10 0 obj
<>
endobj
11 0 obj
<>
endobj
64 0 obj
(file:///usr.osd.mil/Home/OSD/OGC/JosephLM/_MyComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archived%20-%20HTML/04-08788.h1.html)
endobj
63 0 obj
<>
endobj
65 0 obj
<>
endobj
58 0 obj
[17 0 R/XYZ 0 177.0 null]
endobj
59 0 obj
[17 0 R/XYZ 0 138.0 null]
endobj
60 0 obj
[17 0 R/XYZ 0 99.0 null]
endobj
61 0 obj
[18 0 R/XYZ 0 726.0 null]
endobj
62 0 obj
[18 0 R/XYZ 0 621.0 null]
endobj
4 0 obj
<>
endobj
xref
0 66
0000000000 65535 f
0000000016 00000 n
0000000141 00000 n
0000003658 00000 n
0000156897 00000 n
0000003536 00000 n
0000003591 00000 n
0000003745 00000 n
0000003772 00000 n
0000156061 00000 n
0000156229 00000 n
0000156271 00000 n
0000155871 00000 n
0000004610 00000 n
0000148047 00000 n
0000142015 00000 n
0000132998 00000 n
0000129019 00000 n
0000125792 00000 n
0000003875 00000 n
0000003921 00000 n
0000003970 00000 n
0000004243 00000 n
0000004051 00000 n
0000004083 00000 n
0000004115 00000 n
0000004147 00000 n
0000004179 00000 n
0000004211 00000 n
0000004835 00000 n
0000004860 00000 n
0000010239 00000 n
0000010288 00000 n
0000010323 00000 n
0000010833 00000 n
0000011314 00000 n
0000125468 00000 n
0000071915 00000 n
0000072182 00000 n
0000032054 00000 n
0000032327 00000 n
0000011693 00000 n
0000011974 00000 n
0000012326 00000 n
0000032887 00000 n
0000072799 00000 n
0000125992 00000 n
0000129219 00000 n
0000133212 00000 n
0000133251 00000 n
0000141043 00000 n
0000141367 00000 n
0000141691 00000 n
0000142226 00000 n
0000148261 00000 n
0000148286 00000 n
0000155547 00000 n
0000155956 00000 n
0000156688 00000 n
0000156730 00000 n
0000156772 00000 n
0000156813 00000 n
0000156855 00000 n
0000156479 00000 n
0000156313 00000 n
0000156635 00000 n
trailer
<<0938013F38A67E4EBDBC61261411D551>]>>
startxref
157070
%%EOF
C?O+g^ʧ]G+ڼ ouxmWΕ
%]d~WR+(se_QhBRpB0*\Y S-YqdY U9U-K\K dҞ专SuPM)!B9B9ͺ8LiTn Ԑf[9`v+s,1;&CL#~*[ha5RV zRJm5 k#jAͨ*,6ISʶUGpbMUy%bNCsE=BRB]K'&%'V3UsUUwӨи;v0LҎ)I2\,7vg?;DV' N2$}C O"v$ H [74K$YQgw~5"{Y5՟[Y) 2vK' ;"ۤ8M
d"`8ɨs 8ɬ:$zhԉB uL,- TcD\8[::jC vdGW0tfda; GD8NeP>G͵up^1
b[tmCj8ZɭOxB^AQ]g{vE.l*tS[?u|HLXNS:-:ũ$IuD]dөo*iiSII'-}Ut9}ssB<1G(`Kp7>;8{.)$[̓%.ia&F؈ ZA kaFF
ZT"0- k{EpXҹmÙӍPM
d eGR1ɲfŰw-5? ~J8)|+ɼ u֙yF:O 0L 6sh6ƱQwN`ag/ `v'^ ;E@_a'
]} 7:韅
L&:2* aq= a
_
Z:;%0ebdIh z0خ~ˣkԟ|bi`[ڏc
V߃tNCN r'Y7uoY (.&x) FD}
XU crl_r^c/`
BriI`QoQyuv$hGrYIZR(o
) "[e*{ t#(l6e[ M[ͪ S<Ӛ k_` l8y }I`Q#N=p9hzN9DԉQNte1"^8*y,ԣ" VM 9 [[l˜!*UԬ#D5`(`xAn{paaF-0jR IrM@'tYڨL`e 0p` ؔ 0ۭ@K'-+S/= O58tkBM7fGd arxw0@
]b~0 vgۥ\E"%wB.%U%&2#^_^N
T*=%c,CjcH !Dr`J cGQy/xĸx,T@bz+\%Wwq!NWH.L?8ɢkCL+xJ!R肥 -[9ȿ,$N?o%& eZGơ}1S mK?*gx "M$
:#3G
UZU_w=iA~`@,X~K_Ct )SDn;)b%
_[҃_)Zkik!*S4rIMNhr'5:U갴%.~M8uZvGZgM
oke)ƌ?+|l"WS|¿_Ҥ;ť ֫Ym7݇ŏe8㝰MA })
Qh_^uq,%sOըRR.u=WsUYG{mUR{}v y\Gv 8
R sF%sXmlm"$^
u(xzϱ ;Fb;fMe,e_f/7OR8z%;q`m&V /7x< 1sJq&9[wYZ ݛ7l