%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T15:36:11-04:00
2021-07-02T15:36:11-04:00
2021-07-02T15:36:11-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
04-09197.h1
uuid:66653bcf-685c-4ec0-aca0-3a78c357f3d8
uuid:1855a0cc-c81f-4185-9595-10c95cf3c776
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
19 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
20 0 obj
<>
endobj
21 0 obj
<>
endobj
23 0 obj
[22 0 R 22 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
[22 0 R 22 0 R]
endobj
25 0 obj
[22 0 R 22 0 R]
endobj
26 0 obj
[22 0 R 22 0 R]
endobj
27 0 obj
[22 0 R 22 0 R]
endobj
28 0 obj
[22 0 R 22 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
<><><><><><><><><><>]/P 20 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
29 0 obj
[35 0 R 36 0 R]
endobj
30 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(04-09197.h1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/04-09197.h1.html)Tj
50.296 0 Td
([7/2/2021 3:36:11 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 624.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 623.9997 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 623.25 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 623.9997 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.751 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: December 29, 2006)Tj
0 -2.75 TD
(In re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(-----------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(CR Case No. 04-09197)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
14.419 -2.125 Td
(DECISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE)Tj
3.223 -2.125 Td
(CAROL G. RICCIARDELLO)Tj
11.25 0 0 11.25 263.9979 525 Tm
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 263.9979 524.25 cm
0 0 m
83.754 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 500.25 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-3.721 -2.2 Td
(Eric Borgstrom, Esq., Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
4.499 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
1.501 -2.2 Td
(Sandra Perry)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 276.5312 400.5 Tm
(SYNOPSIS)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 276.5312 399.75 cm
0 0 m
58.688 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 375 Tm
(Applicant is a 36-year-old draftsman who has worked for a federal contra\
ctor for two years. He has five alcohol related)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(arrests and convictions beginning in 1988 through 2002. He continues to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
29.329 0 Td
(consume alcohol and has made behavior)Tj
-29.329 -1.125 Td
(changes in his life. He only listed one of his convictions on his securi\
ty clearance application. He deliberately falsified)Tj
T*
(his security clearance application.)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
13.799 0 Td
(Applicant failed to mitigate the security concerns raised under Guidelin\
es G, alcohol)Tj
-13.799 -1.125 Td
(consumption, and Guideline E, personal conduct. Clearance is denied.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.558 -2.125 Td
(STATEMENT OF THE CASE)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 226.6914 294.75 cm
0 0 m
158.367 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 270 Tm
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals \(DOHA\) declined to grant or\
continue a security clearance for Applicant.)Tj
0 -1.375 TD
(On August 29, 2006, )Tj
(under the applicable Executive Order)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 298.5859 258 Tm
( \(1\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
q 1 0 0 1 298.5859 257.25 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 312.3921 253.5 Tm
( and Department)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
6.914 0 Td
(of Defense Directive,)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 498.3101 258 Tm
( \(2\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 498.3101 257.25 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 512.1162 253.5 Tm
( DOHA issued a)Tj
-41.343 -1.125 Td
(Statement of Reasons \(SOR\), detailing the basis for its decision-secur\
ity concerns raised under )Tj
38.157 0 Td
(Guideline G, \(alcohol)Tj
-38.157 -1.125 Td
(consumption\) and Guideline E)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
12.498 0 Td
(\(personal conduct\) of the Directive. Applicant answered the SOR in wri\
ting on)Tj
-12.498 -1.125 Td
(September 25, 2006)Tj
8.026 0 Td
(, and elected to have a hearing before an administrative judge. In his a\
nswer, Applicant admitted)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
38.847 0 Td
(all)Tj
-46.874 -1.125 Td
(of the allegations under Guideline G except \266 1.a. He denied the alle\
gations under Guideline E. )Tj
38.302 0 Td
(The SOR was amended)Tj
-38.302 -1.125 Td
(on October 12, 2006 adding an allegation. Applicant was provided proper)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
29.742 0 Td
(notice of the amendment and did not object.)Tj
-29.742 -1.125 Td
(The case was assigned to me on November 22, 2006. )Tj
21.495 0 Td
(A notice of hearing was issued on November 24, 2006, scheduling)Tj
-21.495 -1.125 Td
(the hearing for )Tj
6.136 0 Td
(December 12,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
5.858 0 Td
(2006. )Tj
(I conducted the hearing as scheduled to consider whether it is clearly c\
onsistent)Tj
-11.995 -1.125 Td
(with the national interest to grant or continue a security clearance. Th\
e Government offered nine exhibits for)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
43.65 0 Td
(admission)Tj
-43.65 -1.125 Td
(in the record and were marked as Government Exhibits \(GE\) 1-9. The exh\
ibits were admitted into evidence without)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(objection. Applicant testified on his own behalf and offered one)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
25.798 0 Td
(exhibit for admission in the record. It was marked as)Tj
-25.798 -1.125 Td
(Applicant's Exhibit A and was admitted into evidence without objection. \
)Tj
29.313 0 Td
(DOHA received the hearing transcript \(Tr.\) on)Tj
-29.313 -1.125 Td
(December 20, 2006.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
19.406 -2.125 Td
(FINDINGS OF FACT)Tj
ET
0 G
q 1 0 0 1 248.8721 65.25 cm
0 0 m
114.006 0 l
h
S
Q
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 40.5 Tm
(Applicant's admissions to the allegations in the SOR, are incorporated h\
erein. In addition, after a thorough and careful)Tj
ET
EMC
Q
endstream
endobj
31 0 obj
<>
endobj
32 0 obj
( DC /ID.)
endobj
33 0 obj
<>
endobj
34 0 obj
<>
endobj
39 0 obj
<>
endobj
40 0 obj
<>stream
H\ϊ0>Eت-PlX%ڃo3J6̄oY~m;)UAjZ[;H]ZonW]9x>8QۦD|8NnVc_io&ڛZ}eZ}~#;JSUSkّM^y;RAk"WyɖW#[;C]t^Hvˁ>3G90P8G
Xx#(3$hDY0