%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T15:50:31-04:00
2021-07-02T15:50:30-04:00
2021-07-02T15:50:31-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
05-12967.h1
uuid:1b779eb7-ddb3-4924-91bd-cb18449de5de
uuid:c5d7c439-f703-4a89-995e-599078baccbd
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
23 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
19 0 obj
<><><><><><>]/P 17 0 R/Pg 12 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
12 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
24 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(05-12967.h1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/05-12967.h1.html)Tj
50.296 0 Td
([7/2/2021 3:50:31 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: January 31, 2007)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(--------------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: ------------------------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 05-12967)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
14.419 -2.125 Td
(DECISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE)Tj
4.473 -2.125 Td
(CHARLES D. ABLARD)Tj
1.542 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 517.5 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 493.5 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-3.054 -2.2 Td
(Nicole Noel, Esq., Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
3.832 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-0.291 -2.2 Td
(Peggy L. Moore, Esq.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 276.5312 393.75 Tm
(SYNOPSIS)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 276.5312 393 cm
0 0 m
58.688 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 368.25 Tm
(Applicant mitigated financial security concerns arising from delinquent \
debts incurred during periods of family illnesses)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(and marital problems with her former husband. She has disputed)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
26.078 0 Td
(successfully three of the debts, resolved all but one of)Tj
-26.078 -1.125 Td
(the remaining debts, and begun a payment plans on the last one. Clearanc\
e is granted.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
18.739 -2.125 Td
(STATEMENT OF CASE)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 240.8623 315 cm
0 0 m
130.025 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 290.25 Tm
(On June 8, 2006, the Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals \(DOHA\), pu\
rsuant to Executive Order 10865,)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
T*
(Safeguarding Classified Information Within Industry,)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
21.416 0 Td
( as amended and modified, and)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
12.69 0 Td
(Department of Defense Directive)Tj
-34.107 -1.125 Td
(5220.6, )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
(Defense Industrial Personnel Security)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
18.497 0 Td
( )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
(Clearance Review Program )Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
11.664 0 Td
(\(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992, as)Tj
-30.161 -1.125 Td
(amended and modified, issued a Statement of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
18.439 0 Td
(Reasons \(SOR\) to Applicant which detailed reasons why DOHA could)Tj
-18.439 -1.125 Td
(not make the preliminary affirmative finding under the Directive that it\
is clearly consistent with the national interest to)Tj
T*
(grant)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(or continue a security clearance for Applicant. DOHA recommended the cas\
e be referred to an administrative)Tj
T*
(judge to determine whether a clearance should be granted, continued, den\
ied, or)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
32.237 0 Td
(revoked.)Tj
-32.237 -2.125 Td
(On July 21, 2006, Applicant responded to the SOR allegations, and reques\
ted a hearing. The matter was assigned to)Tj
T*
(another judge on September 25, 2006, who scheduled a hearing for October\
17,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
32.046 0 Td
(2006, but at the request of Applicant)Tj
-32.046 -1.125 Td
(and without objection from the government granted a continuance. The mat\
ter was assigned to me on November 1,)Tj
T*
(2006. A notice of hearing was issued on)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.302 0 Td
(November 17, 2006, for a hearing on December 5, 2006, and held that day.\
The)Tj
-16.302 -1.125 Td
(government offered four exhibits and Applicant offered eleven. All were \
accepted into evidence. Applicant and two)Tj
T*
(witnesses testified on her behalf. The transcript was received on Decemb\
er 28, 2006.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
19.406 -2.125 Td
(FINDINGS OF FACT)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 248.8721 90 cm
0 0 m
114.006 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 65.25 Tm
(Applicant admitted in full or in part all of the SOR allegations except \
three which she denied. All allegations related to)Tj
T*
(delinquent debts. After a complete review of the record, I make the foll\
owing)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
31.239 0 Td
(additional findings of fact:)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
26 0 obj
(Cv&)
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
29 0 obj
<>
endobj
34 0 obj
<>
endobj
35 0 obj
<>stream
H\n0yCEK!n%4Vh0(o?;:iH/J|Xnѻln;x/xƺ|QE\-ӌ}Ae>hq+}髨V:n=Yot[JRu:
a벡n^sQa;48E_+lCO3=B[viwU͆B`> ]`9NfM86)OcYr3a 64{k\#>a,yLȳ3a7#w4|Gs>2agsWKE}`oSw9(~կ H<
endstream
endobj
36 0 obj
<>stream
H| Xǫz`<]W@
1rc" DDň7uQD@A](O@zѧ}Kjfu @<|նCUx>cQ B'j9 +#bG6IMQ"!C ]`ʒ |"}{`'r32:6.megxsԘu >q^\ ߤbs)1c:<Pnj| /B6("'A$*b7,V>V)5V˫ h86Sx.aSn6oX 5_$&J*z7tptrviխIfFTh٪uڶkc']v#z|ـ~W_An?
aa#G=zLqc01n~2uZ_f$̜5;qNRy)S,\xeiWUפ]~FC[(kk;vڽ'wᄐ?|hᱢ'JN:}l);WuFY9$ڂ
LZA#DFI4Yz $bH|>.QOs_Ln$@y