ޠԑ:ы 2u?QWzQwA=UE)RR_Gi
4Di0eJh8u̐CP9L4ޣ4M4& (t+͠i&͢4h.ͣrǴ'65p GxAG`GG: QG >9~9ֿM
=$Q
#Ao6Oi-lZٴrhjZCZʣ ZGqmb)mʹhm ])n
6wP}xS! t:J8Q1 :I4r:KTIUtj[T7 t.xr !'h@7\vZAIXJṋͯ(- K0jncԶ!S -x0d>q3Vłqq܅lAh
T
ORԏt3UͶow] Pcݝ]#?:AOʲ{vXhY}M':l5o bsda<86~EBd^RHKE&Vj#Pޱ
S[EJkeAAV(6 )JVn\:+I>+i%O2FO:ˡ5~0,5qa\ WC"]BS~n?_= TwGǝ oo
x39t^> :g*|l~^㭇. ]S s\ȞK9nCai$6=70* xA||O8u,d:.F[=`Rۚ3kh #Y,4 TRNT HeaQaPHDdxd0P#)T$iNQ//q(,
m4l7wbl;@m. Ja 9Ɓ]tK!ڸɜ]sa79ۜIg^r;79ٸ &BqeWU>RX:5 }gtwtHMpq淚Z9 ~ ԉ|6 BOԑ,ˎ'5|l7V$-CWpݑ}asK$8_Uoݕ#H,IX$4#Ēej`I>'VTdgS,>"(wB9/@7.%
.v!qРJ> 14Ұ.ܿ8զ#"3kÎ'֢M_%M~J /Y EJ%<)! IĨ .Y
& !/& Ҹ1=3yNyi `9LC CLlhQ%X&IJP,ݿ4j@0OH a@|i[|=ξˬ`aO>ahD.vCDY[,*nseM[
A2oR.m'"Yc eB`7%xDL]T\ ^]]
7B)
wXG:]"Bc!/'H|F: f?Po\wlIw >QW"͌ks/eYf*sR>YZU9)<̡Ȁ[=%z}סa:y]ixgwG##rXA nI+}\*P( W
(SդٯpJE/f&}Gga 뇢*"[ {&W\ ~m侅 MZLEQE~K*t3E_V:equ5 Y*d]ŃaUFuӍ#)
5Ut_@ |Y /uw.}sN!,I JȘVtR)6]QV"cVBi
EbԱiєISQCa|ql05D`WAɁǹS˅r'ۓD`Y(RJ o[x_Gg{'#HZ䌉<>qml=Q#mⶴU W©KIS)V]Rc#ؤ `
EvLx8g"xv
\Vis*aVnN+Yr&hʙj8tq«'Z'- >ó Us1EiЛ0p͌\C B&z&l N-Ц>_5WMӈPW9yb_^Ӿa
xI%⩩=^:ݪ څ |g=5Fok߷F ][j^nl0 ~~y5I3w;V,W;v' P
xNAv
!Bw%X8Fkg% @$[H\t].F
a.q
%,9dnq A, 'C{(R %қ_}>/Rect[357.0 43.0 371.0 54.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 4/Type/Page>>
endobj
44 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(06-05005.h1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/06-05005.h1.html)Tj
50.296 0 Td
([7/2/2021 3:53:28 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 393 591.75 372.749 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
BT
/Article <>BDC
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 747 Tm
(12. )Tj
(ISCR Case No. 94-1075 at 3-4 \(App. Bd., Aug. 10, 1995\); Directive, Enc\
losure 3, \266 E3.1.15.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(13. )Tj
(ISCR Case No. 93-1390 at 7-8 \(App. Bd. Decision and Reversal Order, Jan\
. 27, 1995\); Directive, Enclosure 3, \266)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(E3.1.15.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(14. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
(Egan)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(, 484 U.S. at 531.)Tj
T*
(15. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
(Id)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(.)Tj
T*
(16. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
(Id)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(.; Directive, Enclosure 2, \266 E2.2.2.)Tj
T*
(17. )Tj
(Executive Order No. 10865 \247 7.)Tj
T*
(18. )Tj
(Drug abuse is defined in E2.A8.1.1.2.1 to include drugs materials, and o\
ther chemical compounds identified and)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(listed in the Controlled Substances Act of 1970\))Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(19. )Tj
(The Directive does not define "recent," and there is no "bright-line" de\
finition of what constitutes "recent" conduct.)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(ISCR Case No. 03- 02374 at 4 \(App. Bd. Jan. 26, 2006\) \(Judge did not \
err by)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(concluding drug use not recent with)Tj
T*
(passage of slightly less than two and a half years between last use and \
hearing\) \(citing ISCR Case No. 02-10454 at 4)Tj
T*
(\(App. Bd. Nov. 23, 2004\)\). )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( ISCR Case)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(No. 98-0611 at 2 \(App. Bd. Nov. 1, 1999\) \(not error for Judge to find\
that)Tj
T*
(last marijuana use nine months before close of record was not recent\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(20. )Tj
(DI MC E2.A8.1.3.2. \()Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
(The drug involvement was an isolated or aberrational event)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
34.274 0 Td
(\) and DI MC E2.A8.1.3.4.)Tj
-34.274 -1.125 Td
(\()Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
(Satisfactory completion of a prescribed drug treatment program including\
)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
30.358 0 Td
(rehabilitation and aftercare requirements,)Tj
-30.358 -1.125 Td
(without recurrence of abuse, and a favorable prognosis by a credential m\
edical professional)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
37.134 0 Td
(\) do not apply because no)Tj
-37.134 -1.125 Td
(information was provided indicating that Applicant had attended a drug t\
reatment program and he used marijuana on a)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(number of occasions between 1998 and 2005.)Tj
EMC
ET
endstream
endobj
16 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 3/Type/Page>>
endobj
45 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(06-05005.h1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/06-05005.h1.html)Tj
50.296 0 Td
([7/2/2021 3:53:28 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 755.25 Tm
(protecting our national interests.)Tj
ET
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 729.75 Tm
(Subsequent to losing a job he thought he would have indefinitely and a s\
econd job a few months later, Applicant started)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(smoking marijuana, a decision he now realizes was wrong. While he active\
ly)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
31.101 0 Td
(decided to engage in conduct he knew was)Tj
-31.101 -1.125 Td
(wrong, he initially did so during a period of his life when he job prosp\
ects seemed bleak. He viewed his career, as he)Tj
T*
(had known it, as over, leading him to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.108 0 Td
(make poor decisions about drug use. He struggled for several years to fi\
nd secure)Tj
-15.108 -1.125 Td
(employment. He thought his employment at Company D was permanent; thus, \
he was shocked when his job was)Tj
T*
(eliminated. He again smoked marijuana occasionally. He finally evaluated\
his conduct and decided it should cease. His)Tj
T*
(credibility is excellent. His voluntary disclosure of his past drug use \
during the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
31.771 0 Td
(processing of his security clearance is)Tj
-31.771 -1.125 Td
(the sole basis for the government's knowledge of his marijuana use. He h\
as kept his promise to his wife. Given the)Tj
T*
(importance of this promise to him, there is)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
17.247 0 Td
(little likelihood that he will smoke marijuana in the future. His family\
life is)Tj
-17.247 -1.125 Td
(stable and his finances are good. His goal is to live a healthy life, an\
d he does not see drugs as a healthy way of living.)Tj
T*
(Given his attitude, there is little potential for coercion, pressure, ex\
ploitation or duress. In voluntarily revealing his drug)Tj
T*
(use, he demonstrated honesty. He has mitigated the government's concerns\
)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
30.172 0 Td
(about his past marijuana use. Accordingly,)Tj
-30.172 -1.125 Td
(for the reasons stated, I find that it is clearly consistent with the na\
tional interest to grant a security clearance to)Tj
T*
(Applicant.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
19.364 -2.125 Td
(FORMAL FINDINGS)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 248.374 528 cm
0 0 m
115.002 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 503.25 Tm
(Formal findings For or Against Applicant on the allegations set forth in\
the SOR, as required by Section E3.1.25 of)Tj
T*
(Enclosure 3 of the Directive, are:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(SOR \266 1-Guideline H : )Tj
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
T*
(Subparagraph a: )Tj
6.775 0 Td
(For Applicant)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
14.908 -2.125 Td
(DECISION)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 276.2002 412.5 cm
0 0 m
59.35 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 387.75 Tm
(In light of all of the circumstances presented by the record in this cas\
e, it is clearly consistent with the national interest)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(to grant a security clearance for Applicant. Clearance is granted.)Tj
21.143 -2.125 Td
(Mary E. Henry)Tj
-1.278 -2.125 Td
(Administrative Judge)Tj
-19.865 -2.125 Td
(1. )Tj
(Applicant's response to the SOR, dated May 15, 2006, at 1.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(2. )Tj
(Government Exhibit 1 \(Applicant's security clearance application, dated\
July 22, 2005\) at 1, 2, 6-7.)Tj
T*
(3. )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
(Id)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(. at 9-10, 17, 20; Tr. at 16, 18, 21.)Tj
T*
(4. )Tj
(Government Exhibit 1, )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
10.443 0 Td
(supra)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( 2, at 10-16; Tr. at 16-17, 19.)Tj
-10.443 -2.125 Td
(5. )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
(Id)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(. at 17, 20; Tr. at 12, 22, 24, 26.)Tj
T*
(6. )Tj
(Government Exhibit 2 \(Applicant's signed statement, dated November 8, 2\
005\) at 2; Tr. at 20, 22-23.)Tj
T*
(7. )Tj
(Government Exhibit 2, )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
10.443 0 Td
(supra)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( note 6, at 3; Tr. at 13, 14, 20, 27, 33-34.)Tj
-10.443 -2.125 Td
(8. )Tj
(Directive, Enclosure 2, \266 E2.2.1.1. through E2.2.1.9.)Tj
T*
(9. )Tj
(ISCR Case No. 96-0277 at 2 \(App. Bd., Jul. 11, 1997\).)Tj
T*
(10. )Tj
(ISCR Case No. 97-0016 at 3 \(App. Bd., Dec. 31, 1997\); Directive, Enclo\
sure 3, \266 E3.1.14.)Tj
T*
(11. )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
(Department of the Navy v. Egan)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
14.386 0 Td
(, 484 U.S. 518, 528 \(1988\).)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
15 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 2/Type/Page>>
endobj
46 0 obj
[48 0 R 49 0 R 50 0 R 51 0 R 52 0 R 53 0 R 54 0 R 55 0 R 56 0 R 57 0 R 58 0 R 59 0 R 60 0 R]
endobj
47 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(06-05005.h1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/06-05005.h1.html)Tj
50.296 0 Td
([7/2/2021 3:53:28 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 755.25 Tm
(extent, and)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
4.637 0 Td
(seriousness of the conduct; \(2\) the circumstances surrounding the cond\
uct; \(3\) the frequency and recency of)Tj
ET
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 741.75 Tm
(the conduct; \(4\) the individual's age and maturity at the time of the \
conduct; \(5\) the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
33.503 0 Td
(voluntariness of participation; \(6\))Tj
-33.503 -1.125 Td
(the presence or absence of rehabilitation and other behavioral changes; \
\(7\) the motivation for the conduct; \(8\) the)Tj
0 -1.375 TD
(potential for pressure, coercion, exploitation, or)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
19.299 0 Td
(duress; and \(9\) the likelihood of continuation or recurrence.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 533.8281 716.25 Tm
( \(8\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 533.8281 715.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 686.25 Tm
(The sole purpose of a security clearance determination is to decide if i\
t is clearly consistent with the national interest to)Tj
T*
(grant or continue a security clearance for an applicant.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 276.8711 674.25 Tm
( \(9\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 276.8711 673.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 290.6772 669.75 Tm
( The government has)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
8.664 0 Td
(the burden of proving controverted facts.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 16 657.75 Tm
(\(10\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 16 657 cm
0 0 m
16.244 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 32.2437 653.25 Tm
( The burden of proof is something less than a preponderance of the evide\
nce.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 402.1167 657.75 Tm
( \(11\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 402.1167 657 cm
0 0 m
18.681 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 420.7979 653.25 Tm
( Once the government has met its)Tj
-33.733 -1.125 Td
(burden, the burden shifts to the applicant)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.607 0 Td
(to present evidence of refutation, extenuation, or mitigation to overcom\
e the)Tj
-16.607 -1.375 Td
(case against him.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 98.3066 627.75 Tm
( \(12\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 98.3066 627 cm
0 0 m
18.681 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 116.9878 623.25 Tm
( Additionally, an applicant has the ultimate burden of persuasion to obt\
ain a favorable clearance)Tj
-8.416 -1.375 Td
(decision.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 58.9902 611.25 Tm
( \(13\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 58.9902 610.5 cm
0 0 m
18.681 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 578.25 Tm
(No one has a right to a security clearance,)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 216.9121 582.75 Tm
( \(14\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 216.9121 582 cm
0 0 m
18.681 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 235.5933 578.25 Tm
( and "the clearly consistent standard indicates that security clearance)Tj
-18.299 -1.375 Td
(determinations should err, if they must, on the side of denials.")Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 317.8398 566.25 Tm
( \(15\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 317.8398 565.5 cm
0 0 m
18.681 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 336.521 561.75 Tm
( Any reasonable)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(doubt about whether an applicant)Tj
-26.71 -1.375 Td
(should be allowed access to sensitive information must be resolved in fa\
vor of protecting such sensitive information.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 576.2031 549.75 Tm
( \(16\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 576.2031 549 cm
0 0 m
18.681 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 531.75 Tm
(Section 7 of Executive Order 10865)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.663 0 Td
(specifically provides industrial security clearance decisions shall be "\
in terms of the)Tj
-14.663 -1.125 Td
(national interest and shall in no sense be a determination as to the loy\
alty of the applicant concerned." The decision)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
46.366 0 Td
(to)Tj
-46.366 -1.125 Td
(deny an individual a security clearance is not necessarily a determinati\
on as to the allegiance, loyalty, and patriotism of)Tj
T*
(an applicant.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 77.3066 492.75 Tm
( \(17\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 77.3066 492 cm
0 0 m
18.681 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 95.9878 488.25 Tm
( It is merely an indication that the applicant has not met the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
23.965 0 Td
(strict guidelines the President and the)Tj
-30.631 -1.125 Td
(Secretary of Defense have established for issuing a clearance.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Based upon a consideration of the evidence as a whole, I find the follow\
ing adjudicative guideline most pertinent to an)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(evaluation of the facts of this case:)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
0 -2.125 TD
(Drug Involvement - Guideline H: Improper or illegal involvement with dru\
gs, raises questions regarding an)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(individual's willingness or ability to protect classified information. D\
rug)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
30.946 0 Td
(abuse or dependence may impair social)Tj
-30.946 -1.125 Td
(or occupational functioning, increasing the risk of an unauthorized disc\
losure of classified information.)Tj
20.489 -2.125 Td
(CONCLUSIONS)Tj
ET
0 G
q 1 0 0 1 261.8652 357 cm
0 0 m
88.02 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 332.25 Tm
(Upon consideration of all the facts in evidence, and after application o\
f all appropriate adjudicative factors, I conclude)Tj
T*
(the following with respect to the allegations set forth in the SOR:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(The government has established its case under Guideline H. Drug Involvem\
ent Disqualifying Condition \(DI DC\))Tj
0 -1.375 TD
(E2.A8.1.2.1. \()Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
(Any drug abuse...)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(\),)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 175.3105 281.25 Tm
( \(18\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
q 1 0 0 1 175.3105 280.5 cm
0 0 m
18.681 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 193.9917 276.75 Tm
( and DI DC E2.A8.1.2.2. \()Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
(Illegal drug)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.554 0 Td
(possession, including cultivation,)Tj
-30.386 -1.125 Td
(processing, manufacture, purchase sale, or distribution)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
22.221 0 Td
(\), apply. At the age of 40, Applicant decided to smoke)Tj
-22.221 -1.125 Td
(marijuana, an illegal drug under the Controlled)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
19.05 0 Td
(Substances Act of 1970. To use this drug, he had to possess it. He)Tj
-19.05 -1.125 Td
(occasionally smoked marijuana for recreational purposes for almost seven\
years.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(I considered all the Drug Involvement Mitigating Conditions \(DI MC\). I\
conclude that DI MC E2.A8.1.3.1.\()Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
43.354 0 Td
(The drug)Tj
-43.354 -1.375 Td
(involvement was not recent)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
10.914 0 Td
(\))Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 150.959 198.75 Tm
( \(19\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 150.959 198 cm
0 0 m
18.681 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 169.6401 194.25 Tm
( and DI MC E2.A8.1.3.3. \()Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
(A demonstrated intent)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
19.803 0 Td
(not to abuse any drugs in the future)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
14.249 0 Td
(\))Tj
-46.856 -1.375 Td
(apply.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 45.6602 182.25 Tm
( \(20\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 45.6602 181.5 cm
0 0 m
18.681 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 64.3413 177.75 Tm
( Applicant stopped smoking marijuana 22 months ago, after promising his \
wife that it would no longer be a)Tj
-4.028 -1.125 Td
(part of his life. His wife had decided to join)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
17.69 0 Td
(his church, something that had long been important to him. Her decision)Tj
-17.69 -1.125 Td
(prompted his decision to change his attitude towards smoking marijuana. \
His decision occurred several months before)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(he)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(started his current position and applied for a security clearance. He co\
ntinues to strongly assert that he does not)Tj
T*
(intend to use marijuana or any other drug. He no longer sees this conduc\
t as)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
30.603 0 Td
(appropriate, and does not desire to harm his)Tj
-30.603 -1.125 Td
(new career.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Protection of our national security is of paramount concern. Security cl\
earance decisions are not intended to assign guilt)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(or to impose further punishment for past transgressions. Rather, the obj\
ective)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
31.132 0 Td
(of the adjudicative process is the fair-)Tj
-31.132 -1.125 Td
(minded, commonsense assessment of a person's trustworthiness and fitness\
for access to classified information. Thus, in)Tj
T*
(reaching this decision, I have considered)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.522 0 Td
(the whole person concept in evaluating Appellant's risk and vulnerabilit\
y in)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
48 0 obj
<>/BS<yIӂ7MJ" o"ocyj&ےDfTjҋH xP"w
; d$
S "@ѠĠPa "7'L O{{9ݻm 1T\ZUZU}E$F(8 wlxIE @ @ A;J*1Ĭ#9
Wh|6L;PF{SIxUD/hY!Ԁ]GgyӅr~-, OaGa5nț`KiJ]vmdU ;ggx>x$d8M$ӸIKa۴TmvX
-H[P#!VnmSR* R$T@bQBF䡭j]νco _sgs~T (EҁW9H6,geI5;%pQH*0E3+ӕB%zҬ*ber̍J &^~ @
ﰗ6 ӄ5cq/ ӻ 7 (>,.1RKY Q^+G %: ۠@Cc#my9vy ᅼ3]1v|`kw)UML㗾炟~yҺm P 9~3m[ƏGvYC*-0Жa]Ik
ũ?H5F|PTH/ܦ6 ]!G'RZ
Ajۜ;+P狯 8Q*']U\/ ނB1+?` uȎoRuL{V{ LNAq3ncɏ2UA793K)KL!; ݣ4A+WC٥m\Yړ7m4g/M{c=mlRćG<++C\sI9؛(dD>iSXJ3L/敌LO`eoLبEqJOZY3Fw4549mAkjږVJ+?!I 8"7 lMj[n h q;pd%6L7M6/CmR>R?Q`};^>recVu런t^`'oG^mm#YVhۧ)_%Im8t@Sړ=)bS j\ \=nnTIvހnʏ
%ϣ1VK+RwmoYv9 ޜu#t#FXN<-q3 sk( $>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<