%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T15:55:06-04:00
2021-07-02T15:55:01-04:00
2021-07-02T15:55:06-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
06-11811.h1
uuid:668f336b-e9f9-45d0-beb7-36274533534e
uuid:4018dc29-a0b8-420c-a91f-ca2d57cadf7e
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
19 0 obj
<>
endobj
21 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
23 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
25 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
20 0 obj
<><><><><><><><>]/P 18 0 R/Pg 12 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
12 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
26 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(06-11811.h1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/06-11811.h1.html)Tj
50.296 0 Td
([7/2/2021 3:55:01 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 624.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 623.9997 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 623.25 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 623.9997 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.751 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: )Tj
(March 15, 2007)Tj
0 -2.75 TD
(In re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(------------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -------------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(CR Case No. 06-11811)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
14.419 -2.125 Td
(DECISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE)Tj
6.835 -2.125 Td
(SHARI DAM)Tj
-0.82 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 523.5 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 499.5 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-4.331 -2.2 Td
(Robert E. Coacher, Esq., Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
5.109 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.75 -2.2 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 276.5312 399.75 Tm
(SYNOPSIS)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 276.5312 399 cm
0 0 m
58.688 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 374.25 Tm
(Applicant is a 35-year-old welder who works for a federal contractor. Fr\
om approximately 1996 to the present,)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Applicant accumulated about $14,000 in)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.496 0 Td
(delinquent debt, including unpaid judgments. To-date, the debts remain)Tj
-16.496 -1.125 Td
(unresolved. In 2002, he was denied a security clearance based on securit\
y concerns)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
33.515 0 Td
(raised under financial considerations)Tj
-33.515 -1.125 Td
(and other guidelines. When he completed his recent security clearance ap\
plication, he did not disclose the denial and the)Tj
T*
(delinquent debts. He failed to mitigate the security concerns raised by \
financial considerations and personal conduct.)Tj
T*
(Clearance is denied.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.558 -2.125 Td
(STATEMENT OF THE CASE)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-17.558 -2.125 Td
(On December 12, 2005, Applicant electronically submitted a National Secu\
rity Position application \(e-QIP\). The)Tj
T*
(Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.493 0 Td
(\(DOHA\) declined to grant or continue a security clearance for Applican\
t. As)Tj
-16.493 -1.125 Td
(required by Department of Defense Directive 5220.6 )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
21.381 0 Td
(\266)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( E3.1.2. \(Jan. 2, 1992\), as)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(amended, DOHA issued a Statement of)Tj
-21.381 -1.125 Td
(Reasons \(SOR\) on October 25, 2006, detailing the basis for its decisio\
n-security concerns raised under Guidelines F)Tj
T*
(\(Financial Considerations\) and E \(Personal Conduct\) of the Adjudicat\
ive Guidelines \(AG\) issued on December 29,)Tj
T*
(2005, and implemented by the Department)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
17.356 0 Td
(of Defense effective September 1, 2006. The revised guidelines were)Tj
-17.356 -1.125 Td
(provided to Applicant when the SOR was issued. Applicant answered the SO\
R in writing)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
35.967 0 Td
(on November 27, 2006, and)Tj
-35.967 -1.125 Td
(elected to have a hearing before an administrative judge. The case was i\
nitially assigned to another administrative judge)Tj
T*
(and)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(reassigned to me on January 3, 2007. DOHA issued a Notice of Hearing on \
January 11, 2007, setting the case for)Tj
T*
(January 31, 2007.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(At the hearing Department Counsel introduced Government Exhibits \(GX\) \
1-12 into evidence without objections.)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Applicant testified in his case and)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
13.774 0 Td
(introduced Applicant Exhibit \(AX\) A into evidence without an objection\
. DOHA)Tj
-13.774 -1.125 Td
(received the hearing transcript \(Tr.\) on February 12, 2007.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
19.406 -2.125 Td
(FINDINGS OF FACT)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
28 0 obj
(qТr<%gp)
endobj
29 0 obj
<>
endobj
30 0 obj
<>
endobj
31 0 obj
<>
endobj
36 0 obj
<>
endobj
37 0 obj
<>stream
H\ˊ0E
-:`ytC`2d("?u}CcR*J?nt78so=7ѝK|ڮ?ަZEimC:EU}6mE-1w~Ϯ<އO4[]vЗzZ_+Ckb1v|-9enb%̞Y1}+:g3[yޓ7lbb[,W+xCĶ/K'{p 08ӯ+0}<|<}<|
+--0W@\8S&p
bXa V)z
<SAdŞz"[/쿠z
ԫWQ_W+J_W+J_~[0lS>gl<]i1]lgQ c^
endstream
endobj
38 0 obj
<>stream
H| Xǫz`<]W@BgLyIE#*"h<\DQAQuvx<1Y¾^{ꮮ}:!ZlgL"3 @ -49+\- ˣ6A2Cۡ?-
|8it/ O8v
~>}c3]QLZW'q<^32<.kY=QclN `_~cj52ZR,VR $0A"vmA8gV%WFG-,(B_@OxrsxĞLoGQrUs]W7wz=4lX-k:_EQ͚دem۶hߡc]~ԭ{zϿ?ہ
a0$"2*zh̰#bF=fl'Nϓ&OI˴3fJM='}nƼ.Z$s2Xb媬k֮[qfڲu;w7w>RxX'KN>s\)p+W
馹XvW&MQ
Tm%
4Ri6saBKk!T)
sczzDm\OV˽~7@y