>-4m nHf1 E}\U,x&k
,'MNyٚG3 K4Qb7SN⪦ d7@{ڨf0F$L
Hh,$< Ad=C Bh֥?~N]-|~͗60 1\DyVJL.j.!b DQ3WXSeڛ4/%Aɼ3.zEdyUlaT]/I|V$6n7&9ۥ]C!t?-.xZz$\ _
w{½=X(:$YE^Dp-/ R(snzt<4&1L 0 OhvZqK *ã8Qj%(Wqu?9;Rn@u?[ZG ƙ+ց #PmB jz87/OI|8'#= D8cEq/ehkS
)iQO4
U5?lcZ8xq@} ~\
/*Z%dF,eUcC n!w%}h|X!]Rz0V-e8r;m*-+]c`pP,v ߔ;*WRբh
HZq p,=x
^~*SD l{,b-yOyY7OV.+Cv6q컳 g>sα\ ʈ)~&H4"Z@u S Zek*SY 1Nڄ`II 2:>TyyӇi@ =h{r3F .;(FIY-,Ȣo/nZN$beKƛ?zqbK?<ٸ{CgPo_nJp3?l\Zo|:S=;m=!*Up`J %mkZ puEb=^_Tf8?:~YuU$
:ErU1 RtI@#^ ok U<VK*^S5. D4Kl7cKᙰHNc=#x(HXv͗ݑ!(CHj
=m~
+w*l٩ԹO8<4%yR!1DI=&O A,^4F=P2Q}ڻg69tu6tw,>Δ'cYP|+#(h
|4 fW_Tdo'_kkE~(Ta+$?ibi~fK*R4Ɉ| |Rla(iZa%."H4R!EM-#G t{ 5oEHxq Mq1\-k(yrTwUb+2EJ P U@-$$:IIuX f5hux~a"=<+@ Ի؋0m@
#Х;3Xְٌp8j 7䗹2BQٲF07訏Gev v_s?Rp=q,MӣҠs zLsR?b9\jۓb5~m/1Uo
FL ',~wov껭M5FTj{ZWبiPee]kā+
p #)^ב\ZYlyq!sٸeeooUv3eb=
7lYGZϧ<0 п9TK %5BǻLҲy*dx,d
ed,,;;EgYw68'.n 8w v!аjOrmiNOdv*3d* a23LFZ\';<
:{wُa{&iMnomc>ƖmF. gA 62<}>FT cq6BA=?&|5Lk6ETK˃>k EI$GvFmq->Kl_w%#gB
ITJJVlyaA)BۭS4ZF7u4ۺ*&։1mR?ZBFs '
DT %_QXOS Fj_[Y9'f'\^=Zm{hmZ> 7~t
`
#7*deP3`ezyڬ%N&BYGE
Wdml(aw R u0| ߧ/G0
'"qH$K|YVu5HJ j %`k4 @?:Gcᚃ>qmE k^
mi^bLL]^]v ggX> Y'['ͥ"ʾ3}g ~֭ޯo ;Oiwq-0YLx##T v]AJI:Qt&ש(耑W'(.
TJ aNQϠO9 !hq 7 - <~@}OgG) oL qs\Hvvtu9.0PhʑO\|sړO?r>/Rect[408.0 301.0 419.0 312.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 5/Type/Page>>
endobj
42 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(96-0376.h1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/96-0376.h1.html)Tj
49.796 0 Td
([7/2/2021 3:57:23 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 446.25 591.75 319.5 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 755.25 Tm
(confirms that the SSR briefed him on company security requirements \(Tr.\
114\). Applicant's credibility)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(is bolstered)Tj
ET
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 741.75 Tm
(somewhat by the fact that he did report his falsification in December 19\
94; however, I find that disclosure)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(motivated)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(more by the rumor that someone at Applicant's company lost their clearan\
ce \(Tr. 80\) for falsifying their drug)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(history to)Tj
T*
(the DIS, than by any real remorse over the earlier falsifications. Furth\
er, I found Applicant evasive in his)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(testimony)Tj
T*
(about his drug history and the circumstances of his interviews with the \
DIS agents. On balance, I find the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(testimony of)Tj
T*
(the Government's witnesses and documents more credible than the Applican\
t's.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(5. )Tj
(In assessing what Applicant said to the DIS agents during the two interv\
iews, I have given greater weight to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(the)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(agents' statements of what Applicant said. I had the opportunity to obse\
rve both agents testify and found them to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(be)Tj
T*
(credible witnesses. Neither had any motive to do anything other than acc\
urately record what Applicant said during)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(the)Tj
T*
(course of the two interviews. Both noted the difficulty in getting Appli\
cant to execute a sworn statement. While)Tj
T*
(Applicant was not required to sign a statement, I conclude from my obser\
vation of Applicant at the hearing that the)Tj
T*
(agents' failure to obtain statements--resulting in Certified Results of \
Interviews rather than Applicant's sworn)Tj
T*
(statements--was due more to Applicant's semantic quibbles than the agent\
s' failure to accurately record what Applicant)Tj
T*
(said during the interviews. Coupled with Applicant's evasiveness at the \
hearing and his greater motive to understate)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(his)Tj
T*
(drug involvement, I conclude that the Certified Results of Interview mor\
e accurately portray the full extent of)Tj
T*
(Applicant's drug abuse.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(6. )Tj
(Although I conclude that Applicant understated his cocaine abuse in 1995\
when he placed it it the 1982-1983)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(timeframe, I believe he was trying to be forthright during the 1996 subj\
ect interview when he placed the use in 1983-)Tj
T*
(1984. These latter dates are consistent with Applicant's answer to the M\
arch 1990 questionnaire. I attribute the)Tj
T*
(discrepancy between the 1983-1984 dates given during the 1996 subject in\
terview and Applicant's testimony \(Tr. 189;)Tj
T*
(Answer\) that he used cocaine in 1986 to faulty memory.)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
17 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 4/Type/Page>>
endobj
43 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(96-0376.h1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/96-0376.h1.html)Tj
49.796 0 Td
([7/2/2021 3:57:23 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 752.25 Tm
(Subparagraph d:)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(For the Applicant)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Subparagraph e:)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(For the Applicant)Tj
T*
(Subparagraph f:)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(For the Applicant)Tj
T*
(Subparagraph g:)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(For the Applicant)Tj
T*
(Subparagraph h:)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(For the Applicant)Tj
T*
(Paragraph 2. Criterion E: )Tj
10.303 0 Td
(AGAINST THE APPLICANT)Tj
-10.303 -2.125 Td
(Subparagraph a:)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Against the Applicant)Tj
T*
(Subparagraph b:)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Against the applicant)Tj
T*
(Subparagraph c:)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(For the Applicant)Tj
T*
(Subparagraph d:)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Against the Applicant)Tj
T*
(Subparagraph e:)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Against the applicant)Tj
T*
(Subparagraph f:)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Against the Applicant)Tj
T*
(Paragraph 3. Criterion J: )Tj
10.081 0 Td
(AGAINST THE APPLICANT)Tj
-10.081 -2.125 Td
(Subparagraph a:)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Against the Applicant)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
21.683 -2.125 Td
(DECISION)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 276.2002 394.5 cm
0 0 m
59.35 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 369.75 Tm
(In light of all the circumstances presented by the record in this case, \
it is not clearly)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(consistent with the national interest)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(to grant or continue a security clearance for Applicant.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
20.407 -2.125 Td
(John G. Metz, Jr.)Tj
-0.876 -2.125 Td
(Administrative Judge)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-19.531 -2.125 Td
(1. )Tj
(Required by Executive Order 10865, as amended and Department of Defense \
Directive 5220.6, dated January)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(2,)Tj
T*
(1992--and amended by Change 3 dated 16 February 1996 )Tj
23.299 0 Td
(\(Directive\).)Tj
-23.299 -2.125 Td
(2. )Tj
(Applicant admitted that the PSQ understated his marijuana use and omitte\
d mention of other drugs he had used)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(\(Tr.)Tj
T*
(191-192\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(3. )Tj
(Applicant alleges that he was told by company security personnel to chan\
ge the "yes" answers he had given)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(on)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(worksheets to "no" on the computer-generated NAQ which was submitted to \
DIS. Although I reject this explanation)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(for)Tj
T*
(reasons stated elsewhere in this decision, I would still conclude that A\
pplicant falsified his NAQ even if I accepted)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(his)Tj
T*
(explanation. Applicant knew the answers given on the NAQ he signed and s\
wore to were false, yet he made no)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(apparent)Tj
T*
(effort to resist providing a false answer. He knew that the alleged advi\
ce to change his answers to "no" was)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(wrong, yet)Tj
T*
(he acquiesced. He made no prompt effort to disclose the truth; not until\
two years later did he notify DIS)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(that he had)Tj
T*
(submitted a false NAQ. The fact that Applicant needed the job does not e\
xcuse or mitigate his conduct in)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(answering the)Tj
T*
(drug questions falsely.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(4. )Tj
(The SSR's testimony is confirmed by the time cards \(G.E. 9, 10\) and th\
e NAQ \(G.E. 3\), which shows the SSR)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(as the)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(individual who signed the NAQ for the company, and a temporary employee \
as the person who prepared the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(NAQ from)Tj
T*
(information provided by the Applicant. The AA also testified that neithe\
r she nor the FSO were at work that)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(week; she)Tj
T*
(specifically denied being involved with changing Applicant's answers to \
the drug questions. )Tj
37.033 0 Td
(Applicant's)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(testimony also)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
16 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 3/Type/Page>>
endobj
44 0 obj
[47 0 R]
endobj
45 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(96-0376.h1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/96-0376.h1.html)Tj
49.796 0 Td
([7/2/2021 3:57:23 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
/TT1 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 264.2119 750 Tm
(Burden of Proof)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 264.2119 749.25 cm
0 0 m
83.326 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 724.5 Tm
(Initially, the Government must prove controverted facts alleged in the S\
tatement of Reasons.)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(If the Government meets)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(that burden, the burden of persuasion then shifts to the applicant to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(establish his security suitability through evidence of)Tj
T*
(refutation, extenuation or mitigation sufficient)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(to demonstrate that, despite the existence of disqualifying conduct, it \
is)Tj
T*
(nevertheless clearly)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(consistent with the national interest to grant or continue the security \
clearance.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(A person who seeks access to classified information enters into a fiduci\
ary relationship with)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(the Government predicated)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(upon trust and confidence. Where facts proven by the Government raise)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(doubts about an applicant's judgment, reliability)Tj
T*
(or trustworthiness, the applicant has a heavy burden)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(of persuasion to demonstrate that he or she is nonetheless security)Tj
T*
(worthy. As noted by the United)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(States Supreme Court in )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
22.858 0 Td
(Department of the Navy v. Egan)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
12.886 0 Td
(, 484 U.S. 518, 531 \(1988\),)Tj
-35.744 -1.125 Td
("the clearly)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(consistent standard indicates that security-clearance determinations sho\
uld err, if they must, on the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(side of)Tj
T*
(denials.")Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
20.489 -2.125 Td
(CONCLUSIONS)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 261.8652 564.75 cm
0 0 m
88.02 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 540 Tm
(The Government has established its case under criterion H; however, I fi\
nd the conduct)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(mitigated. Applicant's drug)Tj
T*
(abuse was never extensive, and except for his marijuana abuse had)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(ceased by 1986--the last time he used cocaine.)Tj
T*
(Although Applicant used marijuana twice since)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(1985--and once since receiving his clearance in 1993--I am persuaded)Tj
T*
(that he will not use drugs)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(in the future. Accordingly, I find criterion H. for Applicant.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(The Government has established its case under Criteria E, except for the\
allegations under)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(paragraph 2.c. The)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(questionnaire at issue requested drug abuse within the last five years; \
although)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Applicant used cocaine in 1986, at the)Tj
T*
(time all his other drug use had ceased by 1985.)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Notwithstanding the cocaine use in 1986, I find the Government's)Tj
0 -1.375 TD
(evidence insufficient to establish)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(the fact of falsification on this allegation.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 374.2187 435 Tm
(\(6\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
q 1 0 0 1 374.2187 434.25 cm
0 0 m
11.369 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 385.5874 430.5 Tm
( )Tj
(However, the information sought by the)Tj
-30.799 -1.125 Td
(Government on)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(the PSQ, NAQ and during the subject interview was relevant and material \
to the Government's)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(investigation of the Applicant's fitness for access to classified inform\
ation, and the Applicant)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(knowingly and wilfully)Tj
T*
(falsified that information. In 1989, Applicant disclosed some drug abuse\
but)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(under reported his marijuana use and)Tj
T*
(omitted other drug use that might have triggered a more)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(extensive background investigation; he was given a security)Tj
T*
(clearance in part based on the false)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(information provided. In 1992, he provided knowingly false answers to pr\
otect his)Tj
T*
(job and his)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(clearance, coming forward only when rumors surfaced at his company that \
falsifying a drug)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(statement had)Tj
T*
(cost a co-worker a job. In 1995, Applicant again under reported his drug\
abuse during)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(a subject interview. These)Tj
T*
(falsifications suggest that Applicant is unwilling to speak the truth if\
the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(truth presents possible adverse consequences)Tj
T*
(for his own interests. Although Applicant claims that)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(he falsified the NAQ on the advice of others, I find that Applicant)Tj
T*
(did not rely on such advice in)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(good faith. He knew the answers he provided were false; and indeed he kn\
ew the answers)Tj
T*
(had to be)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(false for him to get what he wanted--a security clearance. Furthermore, \
at no time did Applicant)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(make a)Tj
T*
(prompt, good faith effort to fully disclose his drug abuse history; his \
disclosure of the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(falsification two years after the)Tj
T*
(fact provides some mitigation, but not enough to overcome the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(adverse inferences of the earlier falsifications. I find)Tj
T*
(criterion E. against the Applicant.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(The Government has established its case under Criteria J. The Applicant'\
s knowing, multiple)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(falsifications to an agency)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(of the federal government on matters within that agency's jurisdiction)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(clearly violate 18 U.S.C. \2471001. The falsifications)Tj
T*
(had the potential to influence the course of the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(background investigation--in areas of legitimate concern to the)Tj
T*
(Government. I find criterion J.)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(against the Applicant.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
19.364 -2.125 Td
(FORMAL FINDINGS)Tj
ET
0 G
q 1 0 0 1 248.374 149.25 cm
0 0 m
115.002 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 124.5 Tm
(Paragraph 1. Criterion H: FOR THE APPLICANT)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Subparagraph a:)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(For the Applicant)Tj
T*
(Subparagraph b:)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(For the Applicant)Tj
T*
(Subparagraph c:)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(For the Applicant)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
46 0 obj
<>
endobj
48 0 obj
<>
endobj
49 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0 \/J[bR[c"o?* ̐3%˿Cu\7A SmlqpkTtſJq¾r: 0ӳ .P[:wCy= VP`B/mz$-+K4/)O9{,Si G *VJ(δJ;OviwTx@|>o6)oٰ̢&O#S ^ E>υsf-w;YY RhSs:ΘO}jK]z/&_vᵹ@6Fc~@Y_ B
endstream
endobj
50 0 obj
<>stream
H|TU} 8QPlpp1DMDDX0X`.VXQa/]bx
}z+3{ B A֩_5=NؤGE'/-P 6|pI}(cGFcOb<Gߡ7 0~Ĭ@`MϿpW&Tݤ3*&6yIً 4 F(*,6} :xS2? PGD S(=h=z`D*;4`'P2S<j^wDʒb0(\ Ef):6ɑ2 5p6Ӯ@PuyP:U~
!U>IQ2(\d89F%Kv+Sݣ\y
+U孙 _ժרYv7hȿq͚|Zi_|U_o?ةs~n#"{ջOߨ~ !C:|Qq?v 'M25i3g͞O5DPvئq -.FONs*I߁,|g 5G g7y QN}
(x %:ߓ@ 9l7I; R[ĕ->,cًrzw
ՕW |ZvPǺz h\G |tҶ6&liyY wm> ͥKR=Ny:p Gy 89Kgޠ>
|=bo 3jk4Fh4Fh4Fh4Fh4Fh4Fh4Fh4Fh4FgP_؈!zX3m>\ُZ"[z9Y]كJ_+鋹C+(_peǟQبF%R0mE 1A$TI#sIdyD`&Doe{?9L ߰j&zX`%ەǝ R BCKNcO;5NV\!H
9n㈎m1R SSk;D:wO{X#Ae_cVO]F`mHWr=ȾIU2Vae99u"_LٶVwT S, V;ɶ*OD엘4gaE_殥m%'T3VsUSoӨ]]Ysx,>px2Oӑx =}ᤜ~'\a79=Igޞpb]ҧ%x0>= '&-+k쥒.;D},MᔌI[ƓvC' ;"9$C`0Ӳ.%rb)N98R;BHB;`$hlilRwRm`G?klfdA; `r ｳ!W}hhmUuϹgaW xؽ.Ԡ`W KQf|HHXNSfZ:uRSIw]&3m'N;VIN$t]?2̴ 9~piA(zy_[4$wc{|k南N d rvrwge>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<<_|/j3>/Rect[374.0 432.0 385.0 443.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
15 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 2/Type/Page>>
endobj
51 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(96-0376.h1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/96-0376.h1.html)Tj
49.796 0 Td
([7/2/2021 3:57:23 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 755.25 Tm
(eligibility. The Administrative Judge must take into account)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(the conditions raising or mitigating security concerns in)Tj
ET
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 741.75 Tm
(each area applicable to the facts and)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(circumstances presented. )Tj
24.932 0 Td
(Each adjudicative decision must also assess the factors)Tj
-24.932 -1.125 Td
(listed in)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Section F.3. and in Enclosure \(2\) of the Directive. Although the prese\
nce or absence of a)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(particular condition)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(for or against clearance is not determinative, the specific adjudicative\
)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(guidelines should be followed whenever a case)Tj
T*
(can be measured against this policy guidance, as)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(the guidelines reflect consideration of those factors of seriousness,)Tj
T*
(recency, motivation, )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
8.441 0 Td
(etc)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
1.166 0 Td
(.)Tj
-9.607 -2.125 Td
(Considering the evidence as a whole, the following adjudication policy f\
actors are most)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(pertinent to this case:)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
14.864 -2.125 Td
(DRUG INVOLVEMENT \(CRITERION H\))Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 194.3682 636 cm
0 0 m
223.014 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 611.25 Tm
(Improper or illegal involvement with drugs raises questions regarding an\
individual's)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(willingness or ability to protect)Tj
T*
(classified information. Drug abuse or dependence may impair)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(social or occupational functioning, increasing the risk of)Tj
T*
(an unauthorized disclosure of classified)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(information.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Conditions that could raise a security concern and may be disqualifying \
include:)Tj
T*
(\(1\) any drug abuse;)Tj
T*
(\(2\) illegal drug possession, including . . . purchase . . .)Tj
T*
(Conditions that could mitigate security concerns include:)Tj
T*
(\(1\) the drug involvement was not recent.)Tj
T*
(\(3\) a demonstrated intent not to abuse any drugs in the future.)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
14.975 -2.125 Td
(PERSONAL CONDUCT \(CRITERION E\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 195.6982 405 cm
0 0 m
220.354 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 380.25 Tm
(Conduct involving questionable judgment, untrustworthiness, unreliabilit\
y, or)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(unwillingness to comply with rules and)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(regulations could indicate that the person may not)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(properly safeguard classified information.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Conditions that could raise a security concern and may be disqualifying \
include:)Tj
T*
(\(2\) deliberate omission, concealment, or falsification of relevant and\
material facts)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
33.292 0 Td
(from any personnel security)Tj
-33.292 -1.125 Td
(questionnaire, personal history statement, or similar)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(form )Tj
23.189 0 Td
(used to conduct investigations, . . . [or] determine security)Tj
-23.189 -1.125 Td
(clearance eligibility or )Tj
9.246 0 Td
(trustworthiness. . .;)Tj
-9.246 -2.125 Td
(\(3\) deliberately providing false or misleading information concerning \
relevant and)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
33.211 0 Td
(material matters to an investigator, . .)Tj
-33.211 -1.125 Td
(. in connection with a personnel security or )Tj
17.523 0 Td
(trustworthiness determination;)Tj
-17.523 -2.125 Td
(Conditions that could mitigate security concerns include:)Tj
T*
(None.)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
15.142 -2.125 Td
(CRIMINAL CONDUCT \(CRITERION J\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 197.7051 172.5 cm
0 0 m
216.34 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 147.75 Tm
(A history or pattern of criminal activity creates doubt about a person's\
judgment,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(reliability )Tj
36.643 0 Td
(and trustworthiness.)Tj
-36.643 -2.125 Td
(Conditions that could raise a security concern and may be disqualifying \
include:)Tj
T*
(\(1\) any criminal conduct, regardless of whether the person was formall\
y charged;)Tj
T*
(Conditions that could mitigate security concerns include:)Tj
T*
(None.)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
14 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 1/Type/Page>>
endobj
52 0 obj
[54 0 R 55 0 R 56 0 R 57 0 R]
endobj
53 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(96-0376.h1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/96-0376.h1.html)Tj
49.796 0 Td
([7/2/2021 3:57:23 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 755.25 Tm
(either a legible copy of the SF 86 actually)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(signed by the Applicant or a legible copy of a blank SF 86. Neither coun\
sel)Tj
ET
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 741.75 Tm
(objected to my)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(taking notice of the SF 86. On 10 October 1996, Department Counsel provi\
ded me with a legible)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(copy of)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(a blank SF 86.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
19.406 -2.125 Td
(FINDINGS OF FACT)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 248.8721 702 cm
0 0 m
114.006 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 677.25 Tm
(Applicant denied with explanation the allegations of paragraph 1., and d\
enied the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(remaining allegations of the SOR. I)Tj
T*
(found the explanations of little evidentiary value in)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(reviewing the case; accordingly, I have not incorporated any of the)Tj
T*
(answer as findings of fact.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant is a 34-year old employee of a defense contractor seeking a se\
cret clearance.)Tj
T*
(On 6 September 1989, Applicant falsified a Personnel Security Questionna\
ire \(PSQ\)\(DD)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Form 48\)\(G.E. 1\) when he)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(answered "no" to a question designed to elicit his drug purchase)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(history; further, while he admitted using drugs, he)Tj
0 -1.375 TD
(falsely asserted that he had used only)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(marijuana, and at most five times in 1978-1979.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 427.8965 573.75 Tm
(\(2\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
q 1 0 0 1 427.8965 573 cm
0 0 m
11.369 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 439.2651 569.25 Tm
( Based on this PSQ, Applicant)Tj
-35.272 -1.125 Td
(was granted a)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(secret clearance at his prior employer on 4 December 1989.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(In approximately March 1990, Applicant completed a Questionnaire for Sen\
sitive)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Positions \(SF 86\); the form in use at)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(the time required disclosure of drug use within the past five)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(years. At the time he completed the form, he had not used)Tj
T*
(drugs within the last five years.)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Consequently, he correctly answered the pertinent drug questions "no.")Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(On 30 December 1992, Applicant falsified a National Agency Questionnaire\
\(NAQ\)\(DD)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Form 398-2\)\(G.E.3\) when he)Tj
0 -1.375 TD
(answered "no" to questions designed to elicit his drug history.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 313.0879 465.75 Tm
(\(3\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 313.0879 465 cm
0 0 m
11.369 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 324.4565 461.25 Tm
( On)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(27 December 1994, Applicant wrote to the Defense)Tj
-25.705 -1.125 Td
(Investigative Service \(DIS\) and disclosed the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(falsification of his earlier NAQ \(G.E. 8\); he wrote a similar letter t\
o his)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(employer on 23)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(December 1994 \(A.E. B\). In both letters, Applicant alleged that the fa\
cility security officer \(FSO\))Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(asked)Tj
T*
(him in 1992 to change his "yes" answers to the drug questions to "no," o\
stensibly because)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(the company could not afford)Tj
T*
(to have Applicant unavailable for classified contract work while)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(DIS investigated the "yes" answers; Applicant later)Tj
T*
(alleged that the security office's)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(administrative assistant \(AA\) was also involved in changing the answer\
s \(Tr. 117\).)Tj
T*
(However, I)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(conclude that no such incident occurred. The senior security representat\
ive \(SSR\) on duty at the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(time)Tj
T*
(Applicant started work at the company briefed Applicant on security requ\
irements at the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(time Applicant first reported to)Tj
T*
(work, and gave him the necessary paperwork to apply for a)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(security clearance \(Tr. 207\). The FSO and AA were not at)Tj
0 -1.375 TD
(work that day, nor indeed anytime the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(week Applicant executed the NAQ.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 372.2148 341.25 Tm
(\(4\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 372.2148 340.5 cm
0 0 m
11.369 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 311.25 Tm
(In September 1995, Applicant was interviewed by a DIS Special Agent abou\
t his drug)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(abuse history. Applicant)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(acknowledged that his 1989 PSQ failed to disclose the full extent of his\
)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(marijuana use and omitted his abuse of other)Tj
T*
(drugs \(G.E. 4\). Applicant disclosed that he had first)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(used marijuana in 1977, and between 1977 and 1978 used marijuana)Tj
T*
(between 10 and 20 times.)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Between 1978 and 1985, he used marijuana about 10 more times. In approxi\
mately 1977 or)Tj
T*
(1978, Applicant chipped in to buy small amounts \($5.00\) of marijuana; \
in 1977, he tried to grow)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(a marijuana plant.)Tj
T*
(Applicant used marijuana laced with PCP \(Killer Weed\) once in 1977 or \
1978;)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(used speed once in 1978; used cocaine)Tj
T*
(once or twice in 1982 or 1983. Applicant's disclosures)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(were false in this respect: he failed to disclose additional use of)Tj
T*
(marijuana in November 1992 and)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(summer 1994, and he failed to disclose his use of LSD in approximately 1\
978.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(On 15 February 1996, Applicant was interviewed by a DIS Special Agent as\
part of a pre-test polygraph interview.)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Applicant acknowledged that he had not been entirely truthful in)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(disclosing his drug abuse history: he disclosed for the)Tj
T*
(first time that he had used marijuana in)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(November 1992 and Summer 1994, had used cocaine more frequently and late\
r)Tj
T*
(than previously)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(disclosed, and had used LSD in approximately 1978. He admitted falsifyin\
g his drug abuse)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(history for)Tj
0 -1.375 TD
(fear he would lose his security clearance \(G.E. 7\).)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 255.5664 138.75 Tm
(\(5\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 255.5664 138 cm
0 0 m
11.369 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 108.75 Tm
(The record contains no evidence of Applicant's work record or character,\
or other)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(evidence of extenuation, mitigation,)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(or rehabilitation.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
21.767 -2.125 Td
(POLICIES)Tj
ET
0 G
q 1 0 0 1 277.1992 69 cm
0 0 m
57.352 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 44.25 Tm
(Enclosure 2 of the Directive sets forth adjudicative guidelines to be co\
nsidered in)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(evaluating an individual's security)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
54 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[428.0 571.0 439.0 582.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
55 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[313.0 463.0 324.0 474.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
56 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[372.0 339.0 383.0 350.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
57 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[255.0 136.0 266.0 147.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
12 0 obj
<>
endobj
58 0 obj
<>
endobj
9 0 obj
<>
endobj
10 0 obj
<>
endobj
11 0 obj
<>
endobj
66 0 obj
(file:///usr.osd.mil/Home/OSD/OGC/JosephLM/_MyComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archived%20-%20HTML/96-0376.h1.html)
endobj
65 0 obj
<>
endobj
67 0 obj
<>
endobj
59 0 obj
[17 0 R/XYZ 0 290.0 null]
endobj
60 0 obj
[17 0 R/XYZ 0 251.0 null]
endobj
61 0 obj
[17 0 R/XYZ 0 212.0 null]
endobj
62 0 obj
[17 0 R/XYZ 0 92.0 null]
endobj
63 0 obj
[18 0 R/XYZ 0 672.0 null]
endobj
64 0 obj
[18 0 R/XYZ 0 525.0 null]
endobj
4 0 obj
<>
endobj
xref
0 68
0000000000 65535 f
0000000016 00000 n
0000000141 00000 n
0000003657 00000 n
0000156452 00000 n
0000003535 00000 n
0000003590 00000 n
0000003744 00000 n
0000003771 00000 n
0000155543 00000 n
0000155745 00000 n
0000155787 00000 n
0000155355 00000 n
0000004609 00000 n
0000145448 00000 n
0000140188 00000 n
0000107720 00000 n
0000102552 00000 n
0000098732 00000 n
0000003874 00000 n
0000003920 00000 n
0000003969 00000 n
0000004242 00000 n
0000004050 00000 n
0000004082 00000 n
0000004114 00000 n
0000004146 00000 n
0000004178 00000 n
0000004210 00000 n
0000004823 00000 n
0000004848 00000 n
0000009157 00000 n
0000009206 00000 n
0000009242 00000 n
0000009844 00000 n
0000098408 00000 n
0000044787 00000 n
0000045054 00000 n
0000010295 00000 n
0000010568 00000 n
0000011055 00000 n
0000045673 00000 n
0000098921 00000 n
0000102752 00000 n
0000107945 00000 n
0000107970 00000 n
0000115774 00000 n
0000139864 00000 n
0000116179 00000 n
0000116455 00000 n
0000116842 00000 n
0000140399 00000 n
0000145662 00000 n
0000145708 00000 n
0000154059 00000 n
0000154383 00000 n
0000154707 00000 n
0000155031 00000 n
0000155440 00000 n
0000156201 00000 n
0000156243 00000 n
0000156285 00000 n
0000156327 00000 n
0000156368 00000 n
0000156410 00000 n
0000155994 00000 n
0000155829 00000 n
0000156148 00000 n
trailer
<<69D5AD9C323DAC469D9780C95F2EBE9E>]>>
startxref
156624
%%EOF
c4\2z]C࿉T:0Az>ZK'5 CD\UxZ5+" Չy+2]uYOgQ,b Tأ(P P,QMq( WV/rQ @29vnu_z_nT>%̋EWq$ {\c/x Ыa̦ G@\H'N5ge{i]9lCc/mh? ,G7{ xC` Ig0~w߱hN4:>| W ;,@O8k%;}g0
8&C} [юr[*`0\ׯn>S JSF[
H }D_s+?`ne~c^enc>e> Kp5' T 3212YK_(h.UHU#g[Oiv%:ũ9Fr
k1tzt< lox#ﻉn^tx9,z 6q>o٘30zݧks/Ls097K
* 8ujЊ jF r5&s4m2o=6C ^R^[\4vvwێIƚ =w` zD<*U@qŘks}/ty\~@C=1H cf4)|Ɲlq¹ltbdxNn b~/owO8go E:s u@z(T=agӨx /lYHٰ#SzƟd ƨ"P
t SP (1us|p_]k 9RX4Nԋ H>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<