%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T16:03:05-04:00
2021-07-02T16:03:05-04:00
2021-07-02T16:03:05-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
97-0526.h1
uuid:e3128037-6e36-43a5-b826-448c54b6b064
uuid:ef1b13f1-9b5a-43aa-b95e-ebe52c5cc4a3
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
19 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
<>
endobj
22 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
23 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
25 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
26 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
27 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
<><><><><><><><><><>]/P 19 0 R/Pg 12 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
12 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
28 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(97-0526.h1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/97-0526.h1.html)Tj
49.796 0 Td
([7/2/2021 4:03:05 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 644.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 643.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 642.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 643.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: January 4, 1998)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(SSN:)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 97-0526)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
14.419 -2.125 Td
(DECISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE)Tj
6.113 -2.125 Td
(BARRY M. SAX)Tj
-0.097 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 247.375 518.25 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-2.929 -2.125 Td
(Martin H. Mogul, Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
3.707 -2.125 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.125 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
-5.224 -2.125 Td
(STATEMENT OF THE CASE)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 226.6914 415.5 cm
0 0 m
158.367 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 390.75 Tm
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals \(DOHA\), pursuant to Executi\
ve Order 10865 and Department of Defense)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Directive 5220.6 \(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992, as amended by Cha\
nge 3,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(issued a Statement of Reasons \(SOR\),)Tj
T*
(dated July 31, 1997, to the Applicant that detailed reasons why DOHA cou\
ld not make the preliminary affirmative)Tj
T*
(finding under the Directive that it is clearly)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(consistent with the interests of national security to grant or continue \
a)Tj
T*
(security clearance for the Applicant and recommended referral to an Admi\
nistrative Judge to conduct proceedings and)Tj
T*
(determine)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(whether clearance should be granted, denied or revoked.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(A copy of the SOR is attached to this decision and is included herein by\
reference.)Tj
T*
(On August 20, 1997, Applicant responded to the allegations set forth in \
the SOR and requested a hearing before a)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(DOHA Administrative Judge. )Tj
(This case was originally assigned to another)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Administrative Judge but was reassigned to)Tj
T*
(me on October 20, 1997. )Tj
10.192 0 Td
(A Notice of Hearing was issued on November 4, 1997, scheduling the heari\
ng for November)Tj
-10.192 -1.125 Td
(14, 1997, on which date the hearing)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(was conducted. )Tj
20.994 0 Td
(I received the transcript on November 25, 1997.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
-1.588 -2.125 Td
(FINDINGS OF FACT)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 248.8721 205.5 cm
0 0 m
114.006 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 180.75 Tm
(After a thorough review of all of the evidence in this case, including A\
pplicant's responses to the SOR, and upon due)Tj
T*
(consideration of all of the evidence in the case record, this Administra\
tive Judge)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(makes the following findings of fact as)Tj
T*
(to the Criterion H \(Drug Involvement\), Criterion E \(Personal Conduct\)\
, and Criterion J \(Criminal Conduct\) allegations)Tj
T*
(in the SOR:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(* )Tj
(Applicant is 34 years old and has been employed by a defense contractor \
since 1991.)Tj
T*
(* )Tj
(Applicant used cocaine, with varying frequency, at times weekly, from ab\
out January 1989 to at least 1993, and then)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(at least once more in March 1997. )Tj
13.884 0 Td
(Applicant purchased cocaine from about 1989)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(to at least 1993.)Tj
-13.884 -2.125 Td
(* )Tj
(Applicant used heroin in 1985 and 1986.)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
29 0 obj
<>
endobj
30 0 obj
(zlSRz)
endobj
31 0 obj
<>
endobj
32 0 obj
<>
endobj
33 0 obj
<>
endobj
38 0 obj
<>
endobj
39 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
Cqb>Xpl%3,qC~]:OHvϝ5{p:֠eQ[3N~["Ν%6]p[`uFmAH^3ϲC)ov _gӸx0H;!YF2_\Tèe`NUEpTD|n2#L.s^c@ǂ@tد fz
endstream
endobj
40 0 obj
<>stream
H|XTgEE,pwZņk@^)bAQ1b[,*6EEETeWQ,ϒ%}9s朹sgf D:|N Ehꭻ@>&l_`f V]LONOyFhp@Ѓ5 ZM